Nevertheless, Trueland’s main idea is about how to increase the human organ donors. The author uses some data to show that people need human organs, egg and sperm donation while the fact …show more content…
However, it is also useful for scientists, doctors, professionals and the people interested in health and medicine. Moreover, the author’s structure is clear as the article is divided into two sections which are the phenomenon of corruption and puts forward the approach to solve the problem. In addition, the author has successful examples to support his argument for instance, because he provides graphs to the readers for clear understanding. Another persuasive writing method is to provide a large number of references which can improve the credibility of this article. However, there also has a weakness that the author does not specify who is to ensure the implementation of these measures. It would be better if the author carries out the supervision …show more content…
The government and professional should interest in this article. However, this article also has some insufficient in contrast with Gagnon’s article. There have less examples and references which not enough to support the author’s viewpoints. While, the author also has some bias because he does not illustrate the negative aspects of organ and other donations to donor itself and the family. It would be better if he can pay attention on the balance point and give more examples rather than just give standpoint.
In conclusion, readers who want to get some information about reform of pharmaceutical enterprise corruption can read Gagnon’s article which has more salutations to problems. While, Trueland’s article focus on how to encourage organ donations, but he has some bias because he does not support the disadvantages of organ and other