Preview

Gamsci's Theory

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
624 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Gamsci's Theory
On this paper, Leonardo Salamini revises the basic elements of Antonio Gramsci’s Marxist theory, as opposing to those of a number of Marxist theorists (including Marx himself), as a means to delineate a Gramscian sociology of knowledge. Salamini departs from a historical analysis of the possible reasons why Marxism has failed at attaining its ultimate goal: guiding men toward the configuration of a classless society. The author attributes the failure to the emergence of diverse ideological interpretations of Marxism which, by progressively departing from the traditional mainstream, have inevitably deformed the fundamental premises of the theory. Salamini traces the origin of such deformations to the time when a series of deterministic and positivistic notions of Marxism emerged to shape the doctrine of historical materialism. As a consequence, the collective will of the masses, the human element, was deliberately removed from the study of socio-historical processes.

Quite the opposite, Gramsci warned that Socialist revolutions fail as a result of the blatant disregard of the subjective components in Marxist theory. Additionally, Gramsci labeled Bukharin’s positivist notion of Marxism as highly deterministic and Croce’s idealist liberalism as too abstract and speculative. For Gramsci, ideas are concretized in objective social conditions, and historical processes are based on practical activity. Gramsci also criticized Lenin’s concept of hegemony by stressing the primacy of cultural and ideological direction of the masses over political (seizure of state power) hegemony.

In an attempt to refine Gramsci’s ideas, Salamini describes Gramsci’s notion of Marxism as the most comprehensive and universal world conception (Weltanschauung). Furthermore, Gramsci signals a plurality of world views (Weltanschauungen), in societies structurally and socially fragmented. According to Gramsci’s concept of historical bloc, a given social class maintains itself in power not by

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The author Terrell Carver assesses the Marx’s social theory in his book (Marx’s Social Theory). This is a fascinating account of Terrell Carver about Marx’s social theory. Writer discusses the influence of Marx on almost every discipline of knowledge from aesthetics to theology, including anthropology, geography, jurisprudence, and history, almost all branches of philosophy, political science and psychology.…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Karl Marx's Theory of History and the Recovery of the Marxian Tradition: Science & Society…

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The thesis advanced by Hebdige on the dynamics and significance of sub-cultural style has been influenced by a number of paradigms and theorists including but not limited to; The Birmingham School of Cultural Studies, Gramsci’s theory of Hegemony, Barthes’ semiotics and Levi-Strauss’s notion of Bricolage (Nilan, 2007, p. 116; Hebdige, 1981, pp. 101-103). The Birmingham School of Cultural Studies was itself heavily influenced by Antonito Gramsci’s theory of cultural hegemony. That is, that within a class society the ruling class cannot maintain power over subordinated classes by the violence of the state alone. Concurrently, the ruling classes must mobilise intellectual dominance in the form of normalised ideologies (Gramsci, 1988, pp 193-4). Birmingham school scholars utilised the concept of hegemony in explaining the nature of working-class youth sub-cultures in terms of a resistance to hegemony. They saw this class as reacting…

    • 1856 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Marx and Nietzsche

    • 4031 Words
    • 17 Pages

    Before expounding upon these ideas, it is necessary to establish a baseline from which to view these topics. It is important to realize that we as humans view everything from our own cultural perspective. Marx speaks of this saying, "Your very ideas are but the outgrowth of the conditions of your bourgeois production and bourgeois property, just as your jurisprudence is but the will of your class made into a law for all, a will, whose essential character and direction are determined by the economical conditions of existence of your class."…

    • 4031 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The German philosopher, Karl Marx, has made many contributions to the ideas of capitalism and is credited for his critiques of political economy. Marx was interested in the issue of the class struggle between the proletarian, the majority of the population who own nothing but their labor power which they sell to the bourgeoisie, and the bourgeoisie, the minority of the population who own the means of production in society. One of Marx’s critiques on political economy is the invention of private property in society, as well as the estrangement that labor within the capitalistic mode of production produces.…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this essay we will try to compare the Marxists and the Elitists views of political power and what makes these views different. Before we start analyzing it should be remarked that the Elitists approach is closely connected to the works and ideas of Gaetano Mosca, Roberts Michels and C. Wright Mills and the founder of such an approach to studying political power (W. Pareto), who opposed his ideas to those of Marx and Gramsci. Therefore, there is a conflict of ideas, which is to be unveiled in this essay.…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    4. This relates to the previous reading by going into deeper detail about the outcomes of Marxism by also comparing to social constructivism, clarifying that a nation’s environment in which it acts, is social, ideational, and…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx developed the idea of Marxism (a conflict theory between Upper and Lower social classes) in the 18th Century, when social classes were very clearly defined- the ‘Bourgeois’ and the ‘Proletariat’. For this very reason, what is known as ‘Traditional Marxism’ is now quite evidently outdated, mainly due to the emergence of the ‘Middle Class’ throughout the 20th Century and the ‘Digital Revolution’ also in the late 20th and 21st Century, which has blurred the lines between the different social classes, particularly the ‘Digital Revolution’ which has seen the birth of the Post-Modernist theory of Pick ’n’ Mix Identity, in effect allowing people to ‘choose’ their ‘Class’. Due to these reasons, Marxism has developed and produced more relevant theories.…

    • 1254 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Marx's Theory of Alienation

    • 2653 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Alienation, a concept that became widely known during the 19th and 20th century has been looked at extensively by a number of leading theorists. Theorists such as Georg Hegel first used the idea of alienation as a philosophic idea, but his work was later grasped upon by theorists known as Ludwig Feuerbach and more importantly Karl Marx. The world till now has been witness to a change in different social structures and forms in which society operates. We as human beings must ask, what purpose do we serve within society? What means do we have to sustain an effective or prosperous way of living? Marx believed we have been through different economic stages and ownership of the things we need to live, beginning with the times of the ancient to feudalism (land granted from the crown) to now where we have arrived at capitalism (private ownership). He saw this as historical stages of development where each stage has the characteristics of a system of production and division of labour, forms of property ownership and a system of class relations (Morrison,K.1995:40). This brought forward Marx’s idea of historical materialism which centred on how to interpret the history of mankind and the development of one stage of society to the next. In turn it looks for reasons for changes in human society and how humans together produced the necessary requirements to live. In relation to historical materialism there was another idea of dialectal materialism. This was a term used by Marx to study natural phenomena, the evolution of society and human thought itself as a process of development which rests upon motion and contradiction (Clapp,R: Acc 10/11/2012). Marx further explains historical and dialectical materialism which will be looked at further in the essay. By understanding how humans produce the necessities to live (historical materialism) and how a way of reasoning helps us to see the growth…

    • 2653 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Antonio Gramsci was born in Italy in 1891. After university, in deference to the fascist Mussolini ruling government he became involved in left wing activity. As a result of this he was arrested in 1928. While in the Regina Cali prison he studied the whole idea of hegemony. He wanted to find out why the weaker forces do not fight back, why do they bow down to their oppressors. He adapted the meaning of hegemony. He realized that it is not just concerned with how the ruling classes operate (as Marx had proposed). Gramsci felt that “what was missing was an understanding of the subtle but pervasive forms of ideological control and manipulation that seemed to perpetrate all repressive structures”1. He also found that the weaker group had their part in it by accepting the ruling class’s authority.…

    • 1453 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Marxism is an ideology based on the economic and political theories of Karl Marx and Freidrich Engels. Karl Marx who was born in Germany in 1818 was a revolutionary whose ideas on society were the foundation of communism. Under modern capitalism the means of production, such as factories, land, and technology are controlled by a small minority who Marx called the bourgeoisie. Production is carried out by the working class, known as the proletarians who have to sell their labour or face poverty or starvation. Taken together these two classes form the economic base of society, what Marx called the substructure. Marx saw that there was conflict between these two divisions and that this could only be resolved by a revolution, which would lead to a classless society, where the means of production would be held collectively. All Marx’s theories use social class as a starting point for analysis. In this essay we will explore two areas where Marx’s theories have had influence, crime and deviance and education. Marx saw the bourgeoisie as controlling these institutions. Marxists believe that these institutions form part of the superstructure of society with the economy as its base.…

    • 1931 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Antonio Gramschi understands hegemony through capitalism. He used the term hegemony to denote the predominance of one social class over others (the bourgeois hegemony). This not only represents the political and economic control, but also the ability of the dominant class to project its own way of seeing the world. Those who are subordinated by it accept it as ‘common sense’ and ‘natural’. However, it is also said that this condition would not be possible without willing and active consent. Common sense, suggests Geoffrey Nowell-Smith, is 'the way a subordinate class lives its subordination' (cited in Alvarado & Boyd-Barrett 1992: 51).…

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Through the course of time, members of society have experienced racial and gender inequalities to extend that members in society also face class difference. Class difference will dictate individual’s position of power in society. In society there are two groups of people, those who owns the means of production and those who don’t. In the article, “From the Communist Manifesto (1848)”, Marx examines the class division in society. The capitalist system divides into two different classes, the bourgeoisie in modern day known as the 1% and the proletariat which are considered the working members of society. This system is established to benefit the bourgeoisie (1%), thus leading to the alienation and exploration of working…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Evaluate Marxism

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Critically analyse one theoretical tradition Marxist theory is a tradition which was established in the mid 19th century. Marxism is a sociology of exploitation, it is a theory that believes that exploitation is at the heart of social system. Exploitation does not only happen 'economically' as the entire social system, culture, belief systems, politics and states are organised around the principle of exploitation. This essay will critically analyse Marxist and the political economy which has become a theatrical tradition on exploitation as well as explore different theories on Marxist. Theorist such as Marx and Engle's believe the transition from feudalism to capitalism rise to economic and political dominance of the Bourgeoises.…

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ans: Marxist thinker Antonio Gramsci in his essay "The Formation of the Intellectuals" focuses on the way how intellectuals are formed in a society and the activites they perform in it. Every society is composed of various social groups, which has specific role in the mose of production because of the training the social group takes. This process is considered as the intellectual elaboration of human activity. Intellectual is therefore, according to Gramsci, those people who make the mode of production workable. They intellectually assisit in new productive-organisational activity as also to explain annd elaborate attitude. Not all social gropus produce intellectuals. For eg. Capitalist class produce its own intellectauls in the form of banker,administrators, managers, etc. While peasantry doesn 't produce its own intellectuals but provides intellectuals for other social groups.…

    • 1291 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays