Preview

Garcia V. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority Summary

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
347 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Garcia V. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority Summary
The U.S. Supreme Court case 469 U.S. 528 (1985), Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority, was first argued on Monday, March 19, 1984 and reargued on Monday, October 1, 1984. It was finally decided on Tuesday, February 19, 1985.
The panel consisted of Chief Justice, Warren E. Burger and Associate Justices, William J. Brennan, Jr., Byron White, Thurgood Marshall, Harry Blackmun, Lewis F. Powell, Jr., William Rehnquist, John Paul Stevens, Sandra Day O'Connor. The majority vote of 5 to 4 came from Justices Brennan, White, Marshal, Blackmun, and Stevens. Chief Justice Burger along with Justices, Powell, Rehnquist, and O’Connor made up the minority vote in the case. Justice Blackmun wrote the majority opinion, and was joined by Justices

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Estrada v. Fedex Ground Package System, Inc., 154 Cal. App. 4th 1 (2d Dist, 2007)…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nix V. Williams Summary

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Reasoning: Justice Burger wrote the decision of the Court, joined by Justice White, Justice Blackmun, Justice Powell, Justice Rehnquist and Justice O’Connor, and reversed the decision of the appellant court.…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    a. Arizona v. R. Joseph Gant, Supreme Court of the United States, 2009 (April 21, 2009)…

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    4.) Assess the leadership of John Marshall as Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court.…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    List the names of the Justices who voted with the majority and 3 important reasons from their “opinion”Taney, Wayne, Carton, Daniel, Nelson, Grier, CampbellBecause Scott was black, he was not a citizen and therefore had no right to sue. No one but a citizen of the United States could be a citizen of a state, and that only Congress could confer national citizenship|…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Us V. Fior D'Italia, Inc.

    • 11729 Words
    • 47 Pages

    BREYER, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which REHNQUIST, C. J., and STEVENS, O 'CONNOR, KENNEDY, and GINSBURG, JJ., joined. SOUTER, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which SCALIA and THOMAS, JJ., joined, post, p. 2127.…

    • 11729 Words
    • 47 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Worcester vs Georgia

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages

    5. All but one of justices agreed that the national (NOT state) could make laws affecting Cherokee Nation…

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The court case, United States v. Lopez, was the first Unites States Supreme Court case in a long time, since the early 1930’s, that confines the power of congress. Which functions the importance of the relationship between the federal government and the states. The National and State government both share similarities in which they create and enforce laws. The United States has been dependent on sharing powers with the Federal government and individual State government. However, many cases have been able to represent the arbitrary to the allocation of powers. This case in particular showed that Congress was way over their power for controlling a public school district.…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Brethren Summary

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages

    While Marshal brought the court into its power, and the Warren court fought for civil liberties, Burger established modern technology and brought to light the political nature of the highest court in the land. Warren Burger was selected by a scheming President Nixon who had hoped to appoint a Chief Justice to reverse the liberal change done by Warren; already Burger is in office for political reasons rather than merit and in the interest of the people. Once in office, instead of adjusting to court and the way of being a justice, Burger is deterred to make the court, the law, and the justices adjust to him. He remains stuck in his conniving political games, for example, changing the status quo and voting last to ensure he would be in the majority and assign who writes the opinions. Besides his obvious power complex, that exemplifies how Burger is willing to abandon his morals and beliefs for dominate and a favorable view in the…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Monumental Court Cases

    • 1731 Words
    • 7 Pages

    3. The Court decided 7-2 in favor of the slave owner. Every justice submitted an individual opinion justifying his position, with Chief Justice Taney's being the most influential.…

    • 1731 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Justice Antonin Scalia voted in the minority in the case of Obergefell v. Hodges. Scalia follows the attitudinal model and is a very strict originalist when it comes to the constitution. An example of this decision making process is Scalia’s position on abortion. Scalia has been against abortion in multiple cases such as Webster v Reproductive Health Services and Sternberg v Carhart. Scalia is very much against abortion and believes that people will look back on these cases the same way they look at the Dred Scott Decision. This shows how his values have affected his decisions in the past and in this…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Brennan states that one of the proposed majority decisions is changed into a dissent before the final ruling is announced, then the Justices will figure out the final form of the opinion. In “Separate but Equal”, a dissent never existed, the Supreme Court just skips it and goes right to writing the final form. This article shows how the Supreme Courts decisions can cause major issues and controversies among the country. “Separate but Equal” proved to be a great example of all the controversies and problems that can result from decisions made by the Supreme Court by dealing with the issue of Segregation in public…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Gustavo Garcia said, “I am glad I was able to tell the Supreme Court justices that they were a little confused in thinking that we are all wetbacks”. I remember the first time I heard the term, wetback. I was young, twelve years old in the sixth grade. I had gone to this elementary since kindergarten, and had the same classmates too. We were all friends, but as we got older we began to break into cliques. It did not seem like a big deal, we still talked to each other every now in then. One day while on recess I heard there was a fight. Soon I found out my brother and his friends were involved. The fight began over something innocent, but quickly became ugly when the other group of boys called my brother and his friends, dirty wetbacks. All…

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Johnson Kennedy’s successor appointed Marshall to serve as the first black U.S. solicitor general, with two years of being solicitor he won 14 out of the 19 cases he had. In 1967 President Johnson nominated Thurgood to serve on the bench by October he was moved up to be a Supreme Court justice, him becoming the first African American to serve on the nation's highest court. He later joined liberal Supreme Court by Chief Justice Earl Warren, who aligned with Thurgood’s viewing on politics and and Constitution. He consistently supported rulings keeping a strong protection on individual rights and the liberal interpretations of controversial social issues. Part of the majority that ruled in favor of the right to abortion in the 1973 case Roe V. Wade, 1972 case Furman V. Georgia that led to De Facto Moratorium on death penalty, Marshall gave his opinion on it by saying that it was unconstitutional in circumstances. Throughout his 24 years on the court republican presidents appointed eight consecutive justices, he gradually became an isolated liberal member of an increasingly conservative court. For the part time on the bench he largely relegated to issuing strongly worded dissents as the court had reinstated the death penalty, limited affirmative, and abortion…

    • 1454 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Miranda Law

    • 1709 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Bibliography: * Kermit Hall, John J. Patrick, Annenberg Foundation Trust at Sunnylands, Annenberg Public Policy Center. The Pursuit of Justice: Supreme Court Decisions That Shaped America. Oxford University Press US, 2006.…

    • 1709 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays