Accepting that the Bible is the original constructor of gender and that the word “man” has been since the beginning of time a word to describe one with male genitalia, leads no one to question the story of our very creation. However, Christine Delphy noted that” the concept of sex roles was critically developed from the 1940s to the 1960s” (59) and that “the concept of gender derived directly from it” (60). So, if the Bible predates the development of gender roles, is it necessary to say that society’s self-interpretation constructed it to be gendered? If you continue reading in that excerpt, the use of the pronoun “them,” which is plural compared to the word “man.” Who is the “them” God had spoken of? Genesis 1:27 continues, “And God went on to create the man in his image, in God’s image he created him; male and female he created them.” With this excerpt, we see the use of the word “mankind” which is a generalization, rather than a direct translation to sex or gender of individuals; one can suggest this is elaborated with the addition of the line “male and female he created them.” God created humanity in his …show more content…
Moreover, God built the rib that he had taken from the man into a woman, and he brought her to the man. Then the man said: “This is at last bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh. This one will be called Woman, because from man she was taken.” In Genesis 1:27, humanity is produced as “male and female,” the difference in the story of Genesis 2: 21-23 is that the focus of creation in represented by the sex of man and woman being in relationship to each other. As Monique Wittig says in her essay, One is Not Born