Genetic Engineering Morally Acceptable Analysis
Bernard, Gert. “Genetic Engineering: Is It Morally Acceptable?” USA Today, vol. 127, no. 2644, Jan. 1999, pp. 28–30. ProQuest, search.proquest.com/docview/214609658/abstract/embedded/OR8PLZKZGX6BATI5?source=fedsrch.
This article gives you the run down on the different types of genetic engineering and how they can affect you and your future generations. The author mainly focuses on the moral aspect and how it could be seen as morally outrageous or acceptable. It explains that if genetic engineering and gene therapy become a normal thing, it will be extremely expensive, then causing the economic gap to grow wider apart. The author also emphasizes that if we limit genetic work to only be done to repair genes rather than reconstruct them completely, the risk factor will decrease extremely. I plan to use this to support two of my points, how genetic engineering could pose greater risks and how it widens the economic gap.
“Breakthrough Is Needed.” Milwaukee Journal, 20 Aug. 1991, ProQuest, search.proquest.com/docview/333497792/abstract/embedded/IEV1910J2LDDPPMN?source=fedsrch.
This author is 100% pro genetic engineering in humans. He believes in it because he feels that it will cure diseases and decrease death from genetic specific diseases. …show more content…
He also describes genetic engineering as being unclear. He too also states that parents are supposed to love their children no matter what, however, now they have the opportunity to decide the sex of the baby along with other superficial things. By doing this, it “betrays that relationship.” He also talks about violating social norms. He uses many analogies to try to explain how genetic engineering is going against the norm. I could use this to support how I think genetic engineering decreases individuality and alters the social
This article gives you the run down on the different types of genetic engineering and how they can affect you and your future generations. The author mainly focuses on the moral aspect and how it could be seen as morally outrageous or acceptable. It explains that if genetic engineering and gene therapy become a normal thing, it will be extremely expensive, then causing the economic gap to grow wider apart. The author also emphasizes that if we limit genetic work to only be done to repair genes rather than reconstruct them completely, the risk factor will decrease extremely. I plan to use this to support two of my points, how genetic engineering could pose greater risks and how it widens the economic gap.
“Breakthrough Is Needed.” Milwaukee Journal, 20 Aug. 1991, ProQuest, search.proquest.com/docview/333497792/abstract/embedded/IEV1910J2LDDPPMN?source=fedsrch.
This author is 100% pro genetic engineering in humans. He believes in it because he feels that it will cure diseases and decrease death from genetic specific diseases. …show more content…
He also describes genetic engineering as being unclear. He too also states that parents are supposed to love their children no matter what, however, now they have the opportunity to decide the sex of the baby along with other superficial things. By doing this, it “betrays that relationship.” He also talks about violating social norms. He uses many analogies to try to explain how genetic engineering is going against the norm. I could use this to support how I think genetic engineering decreases individuality and alters the social