Preview

George and Lennie Relationship

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1269 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
George and Lennie Relationship
How does Steinbeck introduce the relationship of the principal characters in section one of the novella?

In section one of the novella, Steinbeck portrays the relationship of George and Lennie to be like Father and Son. The author uses a variety of techniques, such as metaphors, symbolism, and irony to represent the ups and down of their relationship. There are three main themes which are prominent to section one than any part of the book; loneliness, the ‘American Dream’ and the importance of George’s and Lennie’s friendship.

Firstly, as George and Lennie are introduced in the novella, the two are dressed nearly identically, but the similarities end there. There is an immediate contrast between the two characters. However, it is section one where the reader starts to see the close bond that they share. George is introduced first in the novella, a sign that he is going to be the one in charge of them both; ‘small and quick, dark of face, with restless eyes and sharp strong features’ this suggests intelligence and a strong personality but also with some unhappiness. However, in dissimilarity to this Lennie is then described as ‘a huge man, shapeless of face, pale eyes with wide sloping shoulders’ this suggests Lennie’s size and strength but also how simplistic he is. These images of the men makes the reader wonder why two very different labourers would be working and travelling together.

Secondly, Lennie is likened to an animal on more than one occasion, not only in section one but throughout the whole novella. Steinbeck does this by using a metaphor; ‘dragging his feet a little, the way a bear drags his paws. His arms did not swing at his sides but hung loosely’ he then does this by using a simile; ‘snorting into the water like a horse’ this triggers images into the readers head and portrays Lennie to be tame but could be potentially very vicious. Steinbeck’s portrayal is more complex than it seems. Lennie is described more of an animal than a child

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In chapter one, Steinbeck introduces us to George and Lennie. They are migrant workers who travel to work on a ranch in Soledad, California. The odd duo are trying to survive and save up some money during the 1930’s Great Depression.…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Steinbeck uses many techniques to present the characters of Lennie and George in ‘Of Mice and Men’. This in turn then reveals many insights into what may happen to the two characters as the novel progresses. The reader can tell lots about Lennie through the description of his character’s physical looks and actions ‘opposite, a huge man, shapeless of face.’…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    George and Lennie are two very different characters. George is described as a "slim, small, quick, dark-featured, and restless man with sharp, strong features" (Steinbeck 2). Lennie is the exact opposite, described as a huge man with a shapeless face, with large, pale eyes, and with wide, sloping…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    By looking at the main characters, George and Lennie individually, one can see the contrast between them in both physical appearances and their nature. For George, “every part of him was defined”, while Lennie is the exact opposite as he was “a huge man, shapeless of face, with large pale eyes and sloping shoulders” (Steinbeck,2). Their differences help create an idea that together they can achieve anything put across their path, especially the American dream. With George being the leader of the pair, his desire to keep Lennie…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Paria1

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Through figurative language and characterization used in chapter one, Steinbeck reveals the characteristics of both George and Lennie. Lennie has a mental disability and is a regular burden on George; he has lost jobs because of his inability to…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A small, wiry, quick-witted man who travels with, and cares for, Lennie. Although he frequently speaks of how much better his life would be without his caretaking responsibilities, George is obviously devoted to Lennie. George’s behavior is motivated by the desire to protect Lennie and, eventually, deliver them both to the farm of their dreams. Though George is the source of the often-told story of life on their future farm, it is Lennie’s childlike faith that enables George to actually believe his account of their future. George is small, intelligent, dark of face, has restless eyes and sharp, strong features with every part of him defined. (2, Steinbeck)…

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The necessity of companionship is integral in both texts. Companionship can have both positive and negative ramifications. In Steinbeck’s novel Lennie is shown to exhibit child-like behaviour which makes him completely dependant on George. As a result…

    • 825 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Lennie and George's partnership is more like a bond since they get along well, and they both have different mind sets so they make a great team when it comes to solving sitiations that need to be solved. They both have very good chemistry and they like to talk about the same things most of the time, but since Lennie isn't all the way there, he might ask the same thing over even though he knows them by heart. I mean, if George wants to repeat himself he can, but it's nice to know that George can care for other people when he wants to care for them. Their partnership is also about how they have each other's back no matter what they both do, it's like if they are a shield for each other when needed the most. Even though George is the one with the street smarts, and he know what he's…

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The past problem lead to him killing a puppy when he was in the barn, before he killed Curley’s wife. “And Lennie said to the puppy, “Why do you got to get killed? You ain’t so little as mice. I didn’t bounce you hard.”’ (Steinbeck 85).…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To begin with, Steinbeck describes Lennie as an animal. This is because whilst he is drinking from a river and this shows that he has a wild personality as he is drinking from a dirty river. He drank using his ‘big paws’. ‘Paws’ implies that he hasn’t got hands like a human but paws like a bear or a dog. This would link back to the time period as people used dogs to heard sheep. ‘Big’ suggests that he is quite large which contradicts his partner as George of small. George respond to this by saying ‘you’d drink out of a gutter’. ‘Gutter’ suggests that he is quite animalistic as animals don’t have much sense to drink clean water. This also puts a lot of emphasis to his wild personality and simplicity. Therefore, through the use of the theme of animalistic and his disability, Steinbeck shows the importance of animals.…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    12. How does Steinbeck emphasise the unusual nature of the friendship between George and Lennie?…

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lennie Character Analysis

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Also describing his eyes as ‘pale’ could be indicative of the knowledge behind them, or more accurately the lack thereof. Suggesting that in reality he has a tendency to be absent-minded. Within this description of Lennie, we come across the first piece of animal imagery, where Steinbeck presents Lennie as a bear who ‘drags his paws’. Using the verb ‘drags’ gives connotations to slowness, and could be suggestive of Lennie’s slowness, both physically and mentally. Lennie also has other similarities with bears, they are conceived as dangerous, yet they only become so when they feel threatened, in self-defence. As is true when Lennie attacks Curley, here Steinbeck is subtly foreshadowing this event. After being described as a bear, he is later described as a horse ‘snorting into the water’. This can again tell us a few things about Lennie. It could be suggestive of his relationship with George, and how Lennie, as the horse is able to be controlled by his owner. It also reinforces his strength and power, and how it is only utilized when he feels vulnerable. The use of the verb ‘snorting’ shows hurriedness in his actions, but also could be referring to the way he acts from instincts rather than acting from intelligence. Later in the chapter Steinbeck uses a simile to describe Lennie as a ‘terrier who doesn’t want to bring a ball to his master’ that again talks of George’s control over Lennie, speaking of him as a ‘master’. The phrase also alludes to Lennie’s subservience to George, and indicates the lack of control he has over his own…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    OF MICE AND MEN

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages

    As he introduces the two characters, George and Lennie, Steinbeck instantly notes the difference in both the appearance and attitude of the characters. Within the novel, even when the characters reach an opening that allows the pair to walk together, Steinbeck portrays one to stay ahead of the other. This is George, who is the obvious leader. George “was small and quick, dark of face with restless eyes and sharp, strong features. Every part of him was defined”. Steinbeck presenting him in this way hints that George is intelligent with a strong personality. However, him having “restless eyes”, could suggest not only that he is aware of possibly danger around him, but unhappiness. Also, “strong” suggests that George is a character who may not have physical strength, but, mental strength which he may have used to get him and Lennie out of trouble in Weed. George described in this way shows that George is more dominant through his description. In comparison, Lennie, the follower, was a “huge man, shapeless of face, with large pale eyes, with wide, sloping shoulders and he walked heavily, dragging his feet a little, the way a bear drags his paws”. Lennie’s “shapeless face” suggests that he has no meaning…

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Of Mice and Men

    • 2277 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Can a book with impure values be considered a classic? Of Mice and Men speaks about the anger within the American society. Steinbeck’s straightforward way of expressing his opinion appeals to many readers who like to see life as it really is. This well-known novel has influenced many people, and continues to influence people today. Despite some impurity in Of Mice and Men by John Steinbeck, the book should be considered a classic due to it is honesty, truth, loveliness, justice and good report.…

    • 2277 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Steinbeck starts the book with verbal person vs person conflict between George and Lennie during the orientation of the characters. "When I think of all the swell times I could have without you, I go nuts." As this is said, the audience realises George feels that Lennie needs constant attention.…

    • 262 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays