Germ line therapy is essentially alterations made to the germ cells. Any manipulation to the the eggs, sperm and early embryos would be transferred to future generations. Any corrections made at this stage would not need to be made again in that person’s descendants. This type of treatment would be primarily used as a means to alleviating or curing a disease. Completely eradicating hereditary diseases, allowing families to prevent the inheritance of lethal genes in their future children.
This therapy is currently (early 2005) banned in the UK. It is not possible to predict where in the genome a newly inserted gene might end up, and this poses unknown risks of causing new mutations, or otherwise disrupting normal gene functioning. Even if these hazards could be removed, there are new ethical problems that could appear with serious development of germ line therapy. These include how to decide which genetic alterations to permit. Some would clearly be aimed at correcting harmful mutations, but others might be considered enhancements, rather than treatments. Sometimes, it may be hard to tell the difference.
Though we do not currently have the technology, with progress in gene targeting it may eventually be possible simply to replace an existing gene with a correct copy. The longer we delay research into human GE and its problems, the longer will the barrier to everyday use of the technology remain in place. This therapy can potentially be used to treat desperately ill patients or to prevent the onset of horrible illnesses. In the future germ-line therapy is seen to offer a true cure and not just a symptomatic treatment. Such scientific breakthroughs were never taken without potential risks.
Although germ-line therapy is not yet safe enough to use on humans, we must consider technology before it is ready to be used especially when such high stakes are involved. Germ line therapy will likely become available for human applications in the next 10 to 20 years according to scientists. Firstly we must reduce all potential risks, to enlighten our understanding of the human genome further before leaping off into the unknown. So the question is really not if this technology will be used but when and in what ways.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
In his essay "The Myth of Immortality," Clarence Darrow explains his belief that life after death is a hoax and backs up his logic with logical reasoning. Darrow finds it hard to believe that life exists after death simply because there are no facts to prove that it exists. He states that "if people really believed in a beautiful, happy, glorious land waiting after death why don't they hasten themselves to it." Darrow also shows his discern in his views for the soul questioning that if we do have a soul, when is it created in the natural process of reproduction? He also questions "If a man has a soul that persists after death, that goes to a heaven of the blessed or to a hell of the damned, where are those places?" Moreover, he goes into detail and explains his reasoning against the resurrection of the body. He states the mere thought of such ideas beggars reason, ignores facts, and enthrones blind faith, wild dreams, hopeless hopes, and cowardly fears as sovereign of the human mind, despite the fact the bible clearly states that Jesus has risen from the dead and ascended into heaven. Darrow moves on into the scientific reasoning stating that people take comfort in the law that matter and force cannot be destroyed, meaning their soul lives on forever. Darrow continues and says that there is no proof that memory and consciousness exists after death. Even more, Darrow continues with his statement "We are assured that without faith, life is only desolation and despair." Or in other words, Darrow says that people "create" a place that exists after death in order to ease the natural fears. In conclusion Darrow states "we should be more kind to each other and make our lives easier for we live a common life and die a common…
- 310 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
When the topic of designer babies is presented, there is a multitude of ethical reasons that arise; one important concept is the questioning of how safe it is. The side effects of such a process are still unknown. Although the transfer of the DNA could be successful, there is a great possibility of a reshuffling of the entire genome. Assuming that the transfer and selectivity is completely safe, can it truly be considered…
- 1131 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
The significance of genetic engineering is expressed in the words of Suzanne Wuerthele, an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) toxicologist, who stated, “This is probably one of the most technologically powerful developments the world has ever seen. It’s the biological equivalent of splitting…
- 733 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Altering genes in humans has always been a controversial topic, and for good reason. The idea of messing with one baby’s genes could lead to many unexpected consequences, especially considering many human genes are pleiotropic. This means that one gene has multiple effects on the human genome, so by changing one gene, many traits…
- 189 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
These techniques allow doctors and parents to reduce the chance that a child will be born with a genetic disorder. At the moment it is only legally…
- 5533 Words
- 23 Pages
Good Essays -
If gene therapy has been approved in the US, what is it being used to treat?…
- 369 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
Human genetic engineering is the process by which the human genome is being modified and manipulated in order to remove or select certain genes. Moreover, traits that are desirable can be selected, and preventing the genetic causes of diseases is possible. Human genetic engineering, as a new field, has raised a lot of questions and ethical issues. I argue about where we should put the limits for our genetic editing. Should we just use it to prevent harmful diseases or can we carry on with the modification and choosing the desirable traits of our future generations? Who decides? Who has the right to object? I will try my best to provide reasonable answers to those questions throughout my series of blogs, based on scientific articles that talk about its controversial and ethical aspects.…
- 255 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Your child wouldn’t have to suffer from hereditary diseases, they would be accepted by society, they’d have a long life, etc. Women who were not fertile could have the procedure done if they could not conceive a child, but the process of genetic engineering has many cons as well. For example, if the technology were available, knowing the exact lifespan of a child would weigh heavily on a parent. How could the child grow up knowing when they would die because of a flaw in their parent’s DNA, something they had no control of? How could the parent live with the guilt of knowing how much time they had with their son or daughter? Sexual procreation combines the best and worst of the male and female by taking the risk of not knowing what their baby may…
- 451 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Genetic engineering often gets a bad rap with changing the natural evolutionary cycle, but it could, with proper guidance, improve almost every aspect of daily life. Advances in the Biotech Revolution have made many things that we had merely considered to be science fiction or a thing of dreams are now possible.The fact of the matter is that genetic engineering is applicable to everyday life while still being ethical and inline with people’s morals.…
- 1069 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
In the 80s, advances in molecular biology have allowed the human genes were cloned and sequenced. Scientists looked for a method to facilitate the production of proteins - such as insulin - viewed introducing human genes into the DNA of bacteria. Bacteria, genetically modified, then began to produce the corresponding protein, which could be collected and injected into people who could not produce naturally. After, on September 14 of 1990, researchers at the National Institutes of Health in the United States, conducted the first gene therapy approved in Ashanti DeSilva, 4 years old, who was born with a rare genetic disease called Severe Combined Immunodeficiency (SCID), she did not have a healthy…
- 2113 Words
- 9 Pages
Powerful Essays -
In the past thirty years, humans are witnessing a huge revolution in the genetic engineering industry. Having identified most of the Human Genome, gene sequencing has become programmed and extremely fast, and laboratory techniques in molecular biology allow for in-vitro fertilization and transfer of genetic material. Gene therapy and repair based on stem cells research allows for replacement of a defected allele in the DNA, and even a whole damaged tissue in the patient. In general, it is accurate to say that genetic engineering is a controversial topic about which people tend to have strong opinions. The genetic engineering issues that mainly catch the attention of the moral community involve the pre-birth improvement of human fetuses. The ability to screen for detectable diseases is already available in the laboratories. Fertility clinics are also currently able to satisfy the need of a couple for conceiving a male or female child, following the parents’ request, but this is routine compared to the potential of genetic engineering, whose avant-garde aim is the selection of specific traits such as hair color, height and even intelligence. It is this selection that is the most fascinating upshot of advances in genetic engineering, but also the most difficult genetic issue facing the moral society.…
- 1595 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Science has now reached a point where upcoming parents can choose what type of genes their children can be born with and not realizing that it can go terribly wrong.While trying to modify our babies the ending result can create a new illness that might not have a cure for it. According to Sheldon Krimsky “with respect to the farmer, there are safer and more dependable methods for preventing the birth of a child with a severe genetic abnormality than by genetic modification of the germ cell”. Modifying our babies can create an illness that will inquire a cure that won’t be existing but these babies will also create a gap in our society.…
- 616 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
If the modification is performed improperly the damage inflicted could prove to be irreversible. At one point when testing on animals it has been shown that “germline introduction of an improperly regulated normal gene resulted in pogency of the modified animal with no obvious effects on development, but enhanced tumor incidence during adult life” (Hall 162). Along with the fact that “although such methods may be undertaken to fabricate improved humans, in some cases, by accident or intent, the outcomes will be quasi-human or less than human” (Hall 164) people are hesitant to make this method of medicine wide spread. Another reason why people are worried about the mass populace utilizing this technology is due to the fact that some may consider it “a satanic act of disbelief and corruption that would change the nature with which God created human beings” (Sachedina 190). Other ethical concerns may include the “deep-seated fear of the further deterioration of social and familial values” (Sachedina 192) that could possibly occur through the overuse of cloning and genetic engineering technology. As a result of these factors concerned individuals have spoken out against the use of such technologies in favor of safer and more commonly accepted methods of curing the ill and providing crops for…
- 1423 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
A powerful tool that lets scientists modify DNA coding with extreme nearly precision could be used to genetically engineer the human species. There's great potential that comes with these enhancements, such as curing genetic diseases, but more importantly being able to understand the genetic makeup of humans as a whole. This could be a great leap for mankind as a whole since landing in the moon. This is why I support the advancement of human enhancement through genetic alterations of the embryo. Along with me supporting this enhancement I believe stipulations should be placed on the use of these gene modification such as sex not being able to be chosen and age not being able to be lengthened.…
- 748 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
However the most controversy involving gene therapy sprouts not from this, but from germline gene therapy. Currently, gene therapy is used on people with genetic disorders and the cells involved are usably bone marrow or blood cells, these kind of genetic changes cannot be passed on to the patient’s offspring. People worry that doctors might soon use gene therapy on sex (germ) cells, ovum and sperm cells, which would allow the new, modified, genes to be passed on to one’s offspring. This concept is quite controversial, although it can prevent the genetic disorder from being passed down, it could cause unknown faults in the fetus or have long term side effects. The U.S. Government banned federal funds to be utilised for funding the investigation of germline gene therapy on humans (“What are”). Returning to the topic of religion, in 2008, the Catholic Church published a document named ‘“Dignitas Personae”’ in which the Church clearly stated its disagreement with the use of embryos and embryonic stem cells in experiments. The Church agreed with the use of somatic gene therapy, gene therapy performed on body cells, it disapproved germline gene therapy seeing that it could pose a threat to future…
- 537 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays