Preview

Gerrymandering: Is It's Fair Or Is It Fair?

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
346 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Gerrymandering: Is It's Fair Or Is It Fair?
I understand why you are torn when comes to gerrymandering, but for me I don’t think it’s fair. As the the definition of gerrymandering it is “redistricting to benefit a particular group”. What I really don’t like about it, is states get divided the way the congress wants and it changes at every . Even if the states gets redistricting in a weird way and it doesn’t make sense by looking at the map, as long as the district ends up with equal population. I don’t think the way it’s proportioned to make sure that one party has a greater chance of getting elected is right. It’s like if you live there and you end up in a population that you don’t belong in, you may have to move. I don’t think I should have to move, just to belong in the same party
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Theory Assignment 2: Identify the key aspects of current legislative requirements and codes of practice relevant to your role and responsibilities and your specialist subject. (Rec. 150-250 words)
    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Theory Assignment 2: Identify the key aspects of current legislative requirements and codes of practice relevant to your role and responsibilities and your specialist subject. (Rec. 150-250 words)

    Legislation relevant to my role and responsibilities as a trainer in First Aid. The Health and Safety at Work Act (1974) covers the employer and employees responsibilities to ensure the health and safety of people at work and those who are under the care of someone at work,(i.e. students training), the act covers work place risk assessment and and the level of First Aid training that need to be place to deal with injuries and illness that can occur in the workplace. The Health and Safety (First Aid) Regulations 1981, outlines criteria for those wishing to become First Aiders. The regulations cover standards of training and syllabus for First Aid qualifications which dictates the training I deliver and the necessary skills, qualifications and competence I must have as a trainer, including maintaining own qualifications (HSE 2013 a). Health and Safety Executive (2013 b) states I have a legal responsibility to report any injuries that occur during training if a student requires hospitalisation. Equality Act (2010), which governs that I treat anyone with respect and dignity, irrelevant of gender,race,sexual orientation, religion, belief, age or disability and the training must be accessible to all. Relevant codes of practice to my role, i.e. Department of Education (2011) covers adapting teaching to respond to the strength and needs of students, planning well structured lessons, providing a safe learning environment. Qualsafe Awards (2012) that I deliver effective training that meets the standards of Qualsafe Awards, follow complaints procedure and have the attributes of a trainer. Resuscitation Council UK (2014) Code of conduct, achieve consistent standards of knowledge and skills, behave in a responsible manner, cooperate with others and avoid any abuse of position.…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gerrymandering Case Study
    • 204 Words
    • 1 Page

    Gerrymandering Case Study

    Before the 2010 census, Missouri had 9 representatives in the United States House of Representatives. After the census, Missouri lost a representative and now only has 8 representatives in the United States House of Representatives. This process of altering the number of representatives in a state after a census is known as reapportionment. As a result of this change in representation, Missouri also redrew its districts. The process of redrawing districts due to a census is known as redistricting. Unfortunately, this can lead to gerrymandering. Gerrymandering is the process of using redistricting for the purpose of obtaining a partisan or factional advantage.…

    • 204 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Gerrymandering: Gill Vs. Whitford Case
    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Gerrymandering: Gill Vs. Whitford Case

    Gerrymandering is currently legal as there aren’t any laws that prohibit its use. However, some courts have ruled some gerrymandering cases as unconstitutional. It is believed that Gill v. Whitford case could bring about new regulations to the Gerrymandering.…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Study: Political Gerrymandering
    • 51 Words
    • 1 Page

    Case Study: Political Gerrymandering

    Political gerrymandering is the drawing of electoral district lines in a manner that discriminates against a political party. When used to insure party success, political gerrymandering is usually legal but can be contested. At this time it is legal to draw district lines to protect incumbents of both parties.…

    • 51 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Gill V. Whitford Case Study
    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Gill V. Whitford Case Study

    Thus gerrymandering isn't unconstitutional. People can draw the districts however large or small that they want, there is no specification of what is lawful and what is not in the constitution There isn’t even a section or article in the entire constitution where it talks about redrawing districts. To be more specific there are no provisions (a condition or requirement in a legal document) outlined in the Constitution forbidding gerrymandering. Republicans held a majority in both houses of the state legislature, and a Republican was governor so of course they are going to draw districts into their favor; who wouldn’t? Furthermore there are little to no supreme court cases where gerrymandering was found unconstitutional. So if it is not unconstitutional or even in the constitution how can it be justiciable? The job of the supreme court is to uphold the constitution so if its constitutional it shouldn't be in the supreme…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Gerrymandering: United States House of Representatives and Election District Boundaries
    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Gerrymandering: United States House of Representatives and Election District Boundaries

    The main purpose of gerrymandering is to increase the number of legislative seats that can be won by the political party which is in charge of redrawing the district boundaries during that period of time, and to create “safe” seats for the party’s incumbent legislators which are seats in which the incumbent will always win re-election. Gerrymandering is the redrawing of election district boundaries to give an electoral advantage to a particular candidate or party. It has been recognized as a part of the American political landscape since 1812. The term derives from a redrawing of US Representative districts in Massachusetts before the 1812 elections, when Elbridge Gerry was governor. People said the district was reminiscent of a salamander and thus the term Gerry-mander was coined. The Constitution requires that representation in the House of Representatives be apportioned to states on the basis of population. So, every ten years we count up the number of people living in each state and making sure that each state gets at least one House member, divide up the rest of the seats among the states equally. States with large populations get a bigger amount of house seats smaller states get just the one. A variety of Supreme Court cases, however, have applied the 14th Amendment’s equal protection clause to the process of drawing legislative districts resulting in a requirement that each district have roughly the same population. So after each Census, states and localities have to redraw their district lines to ensure that the districts are roughly equal. This process redrawing of district lines has been blamed for almost every problem in American politics. The redistricting process therefore became a target for political reformers. In 2008, Californians enacted Prop. 11 and created the Citizens Redistricting Commission (CRC). State legislators would no longer be able to pick their own…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Government 2302 Revision Notes
    • 4881 Words
    • 20 Pages

    Government 2302 Revision Notes

    Gerrymandering- is the drawing of congressional districts to produce a particular electoral outcome without regard to the shape of the district.…

    • 4881 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Gerrymandering: The Redistricting Game
    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Gerrymandering: The Redistricting Game

    It is like a game, call it the redistricting game. Gerrymandering is an act that tries to establish a political advantage for a particular party or group. Although the Supreme Court ruled gerrymandering unconstitutional in 1986, it could possibly challenge in court. To sum gerrymandering up in a sentence. The main purpose of redistricting is to allow fewer districts for a politician opponent. They take parts of a states that they feel like would think, communicate, have the same skin color or act like there opponent and the attempt to make as few districts including them as possible. Doing this gives that candidate a higher chance of getting votes of the people in other districts. Virginia is considered to be one of the most gerrymandered…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    John Rawls Fairness Approach: A Case Study
    • 183 Words
    • 1 Page

    John Rawls Fairness Approach: A Case Study

    John Rawls’ Fairness Approach is an appropriate ethical framework to use when assessing this dilemma. This approach questions if everyone involved is being treated fairly (is there favoritism and discrimination?). The Fairness Approach examines how fairly or unfairly the actions of an individual or group distribute benefits and burdens everyone else. With this approach, consistency of treatment among persons is key. The only insistence when treatment must differ is if there is a morally relevant difference between people (Andre, Meyer, Shanks, Velasquez, 1989). There are three different kinds of justice -- Distributive, Restorative, and Compensatory. Distributive justice focuses on the benefits and burdens evenly distributed amongst society’s…

    • 183 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Gerrymandering: Democracy and District Lines
    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Gerrymandering: Democracy and District Lines

    Each decade politicians become wound up for the political war of who will win the control of Congress for the next decade or possibly longer. One of the most effective ways of manipulating elections, shy of corruption, is gerrymandering. Gerrymandering (pronounced “garrey” mandering not “jerry” mandering) is the government’s advantage of one political party over another. It is the process of drawing weirdly shaped lines to define a district. The term is derived from Elbridge Gerry, who was one of the founding fathers, who drew a weirdly shaped district that resembles a salamander, it was henceforth dubbed gerrymandering. One of the unfortunate truths in American society and political life is that although we are told that each individual vote counts, the reality is that sometimes people’s votes are less equal. Political power in Congress is based upon population, the bigger the state is, for example California and Texas, the bigger the reward is of more seats in Congress, rather than Rhode Island or Delaware. The states with a higher population are appointed more seats and they get those seats from the states with fewer people that are counted from the census. The effervescent image of American democracy is that of a vibrant government that is open to change and subject to will of its voters, unfortunately this is an illusion. The problem with redrawing lines is that it eliminates the evaluation process that the public has by preventing competitive elections. I feel like it is just another loophole, oppressive scheme for political officials to try and dictate against us. Politicians seem to have the mutual feeling that it is a birth right for them to represent certain districts but we are still in a democracy, not a dictatorship or a monarchy, we have the right to elect who we feel represents our communities voice most appropriately and violating that right by eliminating the person we feel best suites us from our district it is violating our Constitutional and…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Influence Of Gerrymandering On The Government
    • 208 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Influence Of Gerrymandering On The Government

    After voters elect government officials to office, they are assigned districts to represent by their respective state. Every ten years, a census of the United States population is taken, and the boundaries are redrawn so that every district has approximately the same population to ensure equal voter representation and is not controlled by a major political party. It is important to draw the lines so that every community in a district is given the chance to voice their concerns and opinions. It is also important to make sure that the lines are not manipulated by a political party to gain political advantage - this is called gerrymandering. Gerrymandering gives control to a major political party and affects the issues that a government will look…

    • 208 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Gerrymandering Research Paper
    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Gerrymandering Research Paper

    Gerrymandering has become a real issue in many states. “Gerrymandering is the process where the majority party draws an election district map with district boundary lines that give itself…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Was There A Need To Draw Lines That Create Voting Districts?
    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Why Was There A Need To Draw Lines That Create Voting Districts?

    Gerrymandering allows for a particular party to get bills passed easily by having a majority of their party in The House of Representatives and Senate. With this increase they will have enough votes to make a bill veto proof. Political and racial gerrymandering are unconstitutional and illegal. As stated in, The voting rights act of 1965 “prohibits spreading minorities across districts”The court’s solution required that states create majority-minority districts — districts in which the majority of the voting-age population belonged to a single minority. With voting that occurred largely along racial lines, these districts allowed minority voters to elect their candidates of choice.…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Melting Pot Issues In The Electoral College System
    • 197 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Melting Pot Issues In The Electoral College System

    In conclusion, America is a melting pot about to tip over because being electoral college system is in ruins. First, a President can be elected to office even if he does not win the popular vote of the nation, the popular vote is a direct indication of what the people want. The second biggest issues in the electoral college system, which makes it a sham to democracy is not being for the common man. The common man has no control over the election. Having powerful swing states, which determines the election. A winner takes all system, no split party for states but the entire state gives all its electoral votes to one party. There is no true representation for common people, and the people who are the electorates are usually elected party members.…

    • 197 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    What Were The Advantages And Disadvantages Of Being A Northern Colonists
    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages

    What Were The Advantages And Disadvantages Of Being A Northern Colonists

    If I lived in a bigger state, I would most likely be for proportional representation because there were probably more people in my state, but if I was a smaller state, I would most likely be for equal representation because I would feel like the bigger states would be at a bigger advantage with proportional representation due to their likely more populous size (Kennedy 170). I would feel like having one house be proportional representation and one being equal representation would be fair so that each state would have the advantages and disadvantages to each type of legislative representation. Another issue was whether to count slaves in representation or not. Being from the North, I would most likely agree with other northern states that wrong to count slaves if they weren't even counted as citizens, and even with the compromise, I would feel like the southern states would be at more of an advantage when it came to representation due to their large slave population (pg 172). Even with all this being said, I would not be able to know my situation or opinions if I actually lived in this time…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics