Preview

Gerrymandering: Gill Vs. Whitford Case

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
315 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Gerrymandering: Gill Vs. Whitford Case
Gerrymandering is a practice used when electoral districts are being set and are used to create a political advantage for specific group or party by manipulating district boundaries. For example, if one state was more likely to vote Republican you could have the area redrawn into an opposing district to win to allow better results for the opposing party.

Elbridge Gerry was a governor of Massachusetts and in 1812 signed a law that would benefit his party creating a new district in the state. The Boston Gazette would first use the term on March 26, 1812, by combining Elbridge Gerry's last name and the word salamander.

Gerrymandering is currently legal as there aren’t any laws that prohibit its use. However, some courts have ruled some gerrymandering cases as unconstitutional. It is believed that Gill v. Whitford case could bring about new regulations to the Gerrymandering.
…show more content…
Whitford debated whether the Wisconsin state map is unconstitutional because it gave the Republican party an unfair advantage. In 2011 the Republicans drew Wisconsin’s map and later won control of both chambers of the Legislature and the Governor's office. William Whitford, a retired University Wisconsin Law School teacher and twelve Democrats would sue the state with the claim the Democrat’s votes were reduced because of the Republicans map. The Court would find the map to be unconstitutional partisan gerrymander and request a new map to be

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Wisconsin v. Avery is a major case between Steven A. Avery and the state of Wisconsin. Steven Avery was born on July 9, 1962 and grew up in a very small area knows as Manitowoc county in the state of Wisconsin. His family owns an auto salvage yard where abandoned vehicles are obtained for the sale of parts. Avery was not a smart man, his IQ was seventy and he “barely functioned in school”. He had a very rough childhood and he turned to crime through his teens and into his twenties. In 1981, Avery and and his friend were charged with burglary at a local bar and were each sentenced to two years in…

    • 116 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Before the 2010 census, Missouri had 9 representatives in the United States House of Representatives. After the census, Missouri lost a representative and now only has 8 representatives in the United States House of Representatives. This process of altering the number of representatives in a state after a census is known as reapportionment. As a result of this change in representation, Missouri also redrew its districts. The process of redrawing districts due to a census is known as redistricting. Unfortunately, this can lead to gerrymandering. Gerrymandering is the process of using redistricting for the purpose of obtaining a partisan or factional advantage.…

    • 204 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gibbons Vs. Ogden Cases

    • 121 Words
    • 1 Page

    The increase of shipping by steamboats led to conflict over waterway rights. Let's start with the Gibbons vs. Ogden case, it was in 1819. When Aaron Ogden sued Thomas Gibbons for operating steamboats in New York that Ogden owned. The Gibbons vs. Ogden case didn't go to the Supreme Court till 1824. Where the the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Gibbons, and the federal government reinforce their right to regulate trade between the states by ending the monopolistic control over the waterways in some of the states.After the Supreme Court's dropped the monopolistic control the waterways, more and more companies were traveling over the waterways. That brought prices down and made it more affordable to people to buy there products.…

    • 121 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Political gerrymandering is the drawing of electoral district lines in a manner that discriminates against a political party. When used to insure party success, political gerrymandering is usually legal but can be contested. At this time it is legal to draw district lines to protect incumbents of both parties.…

    • 51 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The main purpose of gerrymandering is to increase the number of legislative seats that can be won by the political party which is in charge of redrawing the district boundaries during that period of time, and to create “safe” seats for the party’s incumbent legislators which are seats in which the incumbent will always win re-election. Gerrymandering is the redrawing of election district boundaries to give an electoral advantage to a particular candidate or party. It has been recognized as a part of the American political landscape since 1812. The term derives from a redrawing of US Representative districts in Massachusetts before the 1812 elections, when Elbridge Gerry was governor. People said the district was reminiscent of a salamander and thus the term Gerry-mander was coined. The Constitution requires that representation in the House of Representatives be apportioned to states on the basis of population. So, every ten years we count up the number of people living in each state and making sure that each state gets at least one House member, divide up the rest of the seats among the states equally. States with large populations get a bigger amount of house seats smaller states get just the one. A variety of Supreme Court cases, however, have applied the 14th Amendment’s equal protection clause to the process of drawing legislative districts resulting in a requirement that each district have roughly the same population. So after each Census, states and localities have to redraw their district lines to ensure that the districts are roughly equal. This process redrawing of district lines has been blamed for almost every problem in American politics. The redistricting process therefore became a target for political reformers. In 2008, Californians enacted Prop. 11 and created the Citizens Redistricting Commission (CRC). State legislators would no longer be able to pick their own…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Governor Peter Stuyvesant-governor of New Amsterdam who ruled in authoritarian way by alienating colony's diverse residents and ignoring representation demands.…

    • 1995 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pt1420 Unit 4 Study Guide

    • 646 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In order to ensure that our elections and campaigns are more democratic we have adopted things like the 17th Amendment which would allow senators to be elected though direct voting rather than state legislatures. In addition, the United States has also used something called a recall election in which voters can remove an elected official from office though a direct vote.…

    • 646 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Attorney General rejected it because the plan created only one black-majority district. NC then gave a second plan making two black-majority districts, one of which was no wider than the interstate road along with it stretched. Five residents of NC challenged the constitutionality of this shaped district, saying that its only point was to secure the election of additional black representatives. The District Court (3judges) held that they failed to state a constitutional claim, the residents of NC then appealed and the Supreme Court granted certiorari. Did the North Carolina residents' claim, that the State created a racially gerrymandered district, raise a valid constitutional issue under the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause? Yes, the Court ruled that even though NC's reapportionment plan was racially neutral on its face, the resultant district shape was unusual enough to say that it made an effort to separate voters into districts based on race. The Court stated that the District Court would have to decide whether or not some convincing governmental interest justified NC's…

    • 3484 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Grutter v. Bollinger, the Court accepted that the “critical mass” concept was not an “outright racial balancing”, where race was used as a factor in the admission process (Alexander 151). Therefore, the Court held that diversity is a compelling interest for the University of Michigan Law School as long as race is not the only factor considered for admission. In addition, the Court concluded that the “benefits of diversity are substantial” and “promotes cross racial understanding, helps to break down racial stereotypes, and enables students to better understand persons of difference races” (Chemenrisky 772). Moreover, “the Court accepted the university’s argument that the education of all students is enhanced with a diverse student body”…

    • 174 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    from New York for more than a decade and Governor of his state for two terms…

    • 3433 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I understand why you are torn when comes to gerrymandering, but for me I don’t think it’s fair. As the the definition of gerrymandering it is “redistricting to benefit a particular group”. What I really don’t like about it, is states get divided the way the congress wants and it changes at every . Even if the states gets redistricting in a weird way and it doesn’t make sense by looking at the map, as long as the district ends up with equal population. I don’t think the way it’s proportioned to make sure that one party has a greater chance of getting elected is right. It’s like if you live there and you end up in a population that you don’t belong in, you may have to move. I don’t think I should have to move, just to belong in the same party…

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gerrymandering has become a real issue in many states. “Gerrymandering is the process where the majority party draws an election district map with district boundary lines that give itself…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    C. Former Confederates and African American defenders had opposing views on new black legislators. Former Confederates, such as English clergyman J.W. Leigh, felt as though blacks were prematurely given the right to vote. Leigh argued that because blacks received franchise only five years after the abolition of slavery, they were incapable and easily influenced by radical republicans. To back his claim, Leigh cited the passing of a large grant for the Alabama and Chattanooga Railway. He states that the grant’s purpose was to give money to corrupt carpetbaggers, and that the blacks helped passed the bill after being bribed. Leigh also insinuates that having blacks in office meant that they dominated the votes and silenced whites, doing…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Group representation, also known as proportional representation, is designed to remedy electoral injustices. It ensures that any grouping of like-minded people, regardless of them being a minority or majority, get a fair share of power and representation in our legislation. Our current system of winner-take-all can allow someone to be elected with a 50.1% majority, leaving the opinion of 49.9% of the population to be dismissed. Because of this system, minorities have great difficulty amassing a large share of votes and stand little change of voters. If we utilized proportional representation, we would not only give these minorities not only the right to vote, but also an equal chance to be represented. For example, if black voters comprise 20% of the vote in a racially split county, they can elect at least one of the five seats, rather than be…

    • 1119 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Right now the Republicans have the majority, but it is estimated that if Clinton wins it could flip the House. Most people tend to vote strictly for their party’s candidates, but this election could cause some of them to split ticket vote. Although it is predicted that if Clinton leads by 10 points that she has a chance of giving the Democrats a lead in the House this is unlikely due to the fact that Gerrymandering is popular among the republican states. Gerrymandering is the art of redistricting in a way to help the incumbent, by concentrating or diluting the minorities, so that the incumbent’s party is likely to win, while discouraging other possible candidates for Congressional office. If the majority party changes in the House then that would drastically change the kind of policies that are made because a different party, the Democrats, would be the majority and someone from that party would become the majority leader, while the Republican Party would have to step down and become to minority…

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays