Preview

Glasser's Choice Theory In Lord Of The Flies

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1794 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Glasser's Choice Theory In Lord Of The Flies
Criminal to the Core
Everyone has heard the expression ‘stranger danger’ since elementary school. But what if this simple phrase hides an alternate, deeper message? William Golding, author of Lord of the Flies, has used his book to bring up the controversial idea that humans are evil at the root of their beings. The idea of inherent malevolent nature is even present throughout world history. Perhaps the most famous example would be the villainy of the Nazis during the Holocaust, well expressed through the novel Night by Elie Wiesel. Even today, many people have pondered this concept. In the excerpt of philosopher William Glasser’s Choice Theory, Glasser discusses what motivates a human to make his choices, whether good or evil. Through the
…show more content…
Jack’s barbarous side is exceptionally highlighted when the hunters go out to make one of their first kills in order to get meat for the rest of the boys. This simple killing of a pig drove once virtuous Jack to savage and insane limits, through the exhilaration, satisfaction, and pure bloodlust he gained from cutting a pig’s throat. This psychotic behavior is obvious when Jack leads the hunters down the mountain after the hunt was over, chanting “‘Kill the pig. Cut her throat. Spill her blood’” (Golding 69). Any sane being would have just killed the pig and gone on; however, that was not the case with these boys. Through the usage of parallelism to put individual emphasis on “kill” and “cut”, Golding shows the dark bliss the boys felt in going through with each morbid stage of killing the pig. The term “spill” has a celebratory feel to it, which further adds to the vicious satisfaction the boys had gotten from ghastly taking this pig’s life. In addition to the wicked words in the chant, Golding uses this situation to highlight the boys’ thirst for evil, the addictive nature of murder, and how it affects them. Moreover, the boys are mentioned to have been wearing face paint when hunting. The mask of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    One night, an aerial battle occurs above the island, and a casualty of the battle floats down with his opened parachute, ultimately coming to rest on the mountaintop. Breezes occasionally inflate the parachute, making the body appear to sit up and then sink forward again. This sight panics the boys as they mistake the dead body for the beast they fear. In a reaction to this panic, Jack forms a splinter group that is eventually joined by all but a few of the boys. The boys who join Jack are enticed by the protection Jack's ferocity seems to provide, as well as by the prospect of playing the role of savages: putting on camouflaging face paint, hunting, and performing ritualistic tribal dances. Eventually, Jack's group actually slaughters a sow and, as an offering to the beast, puts the sow's head on a stick.…

    • 892 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Finally free from the shackles of civilization, Jack is only governed by the incessant presence of the id in his own mind. Jack appeared to merely be a strong-willed young boy when the plane first crashed on the island, but by the time the British navy arrives to rescue the boys Jack proves to be the epitome of savagery and violence viciously seeking to fulfill his own aspirations. For example, when electing a leader at the first meeting of all the boys, Jack states: “I ought to be chief…because I’m chapter chorister and head boy.” (Golding 22) Here Jack demonstrates his longing for power by pursuing a position of authority among the boys, yet he clearly has no concern for their well-being. Furthermore, when Jack is denied the position of power, he becomes increasingly obsessed with hunting pigs. For example, Jack suggests that the hunters wear dazzle paint, and he chants: “Kill the beast! Cut his throat! Spill his blood!” (Golding 152) Jack blatantly ignores the rules of civilization, and pursues his selfish quest for power and totally disregards the well-being of the rest of the boys. In addition, Jack establishes his own tribe that is based upon savage rituals such as hunting…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jack began to dance and his laughter became a bloody thirsty snarling" (33). Jack rejoices in the kill and is unable to think about anything else. The littluns are scared of the things they see at night. They give their fear a name and a picture in their imagination and since you can't fight something that’s not really there they create an imaginary thing to be afraid of. As Jack chants with the other boys "Kill the beat, cut her throat, spill her blood" (69), the author is trying to make the reader angry and filled with disgust, the words used "Cut her throat" and Spill her blood" are very unpleasant and cruel and savage things to…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Jack suggests that the boys can keep the ?beast? happy, by providing it with portions of meat from their s: ??And about the beast. When we kill we?ll leave some of the kill for it. Then it won?t bother us, maybe?? (147). The fact that Jack feared the ?beast? suggests that all the boys deeply feared the ?beast,? because Jack, in his crazed-like state of mind, feared few things as a hunter or as a boy.…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    One way this is portrayed started in the beginning of the story, when they first got onto the island. Away from society, Jack had a sudden urge to hunt. But when he got the chance, he backed down. "I was going to," he said, "I was choosing a place...next time!!!"(31). This starts to display Golding's view that civilization declines to society. Not long after, Jack actually kills a pig, and this becomes his obsession in which he spends most of his time. Eventually, Jack and his new tribe begin to kill with no remorse. After killing Piggy, Jack exclaimed, "See! that's what you'll get! I meant that! The conch is gone, I'm chief!"(181).…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The scene from page 135 is the boys hunting down a sow. Golding uses diction like “hurled” and “eruption” to convey the boy's eagerness. The word “hurled” means to throw with excessive force, Golding used this word to show that they were drawn to her death like a magnet. They did not hesitate to kill her, considering they became violent so quickly we know that they are heading towards savagery. Also, when “Roger ran round the heap, prodding with his spear whenever pig flesh appeared”(135) the reader knows that the hunters are not…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jack makes the hunters put on masks, and forces them to hunt and kill, which turns them into savages. Conversely, Ralph never puts one on, and never becomes a savage. Ralph always rationally thinks about how the boys can get off the island, make shelter, and get food, but the boys who put on the masks just want to satisfy their insatiable urge to kill. The use of masks in the book symbolizes Freud’s theory that the ID needs to satisfy its demand for instant satisfaction, which for the hunters means killing the pig, and being able to do what they want. Golding includes this in his novel to show that succumbing to the ID leads to evil and savagery, which happens to be bad in…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lord of the Flies

    • 1696 Words
    • 7 Pages

    1. Jack shows that he is controlling and blood thirsty by wanting to be chief and bossing the choir boys around. Jack as a hunter is insecure in his desire to kill shown by the inability to kill a pig.…

    • 1696 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Just like the saying it’s all fun and games until someone gets hurt, the boys begin by playing around, not working, and eventually harming. On page 114 and 115 it describes how the boys “play fight” Robert as if he were a pig. Robert plays along but soon the boys start hitting a bit too hard, Robert squeals in mock terror, then in real pain (Golding, pg.114), and they grab him. Then the most astonishing thing happens when Golding writes, “Ralph, carried away by a sudden thick excitement, grabbed Eric’s spear and jabbed at Robert with it… Ralph too was fighting to get near, to get a handful of that brown, vulnerable flesh. The desire to squeeze and hurt was over-mastering.” It wasn’t just a game. It was grabby, grimy, grimacing hunters who longed for more than a pig’s death. The pig’s death earlier that gave Ralph the knowledge that they outwitted a living thing, imposed their will upon it, taken away its life like a long satisfying drink (Golding, pg. 70). Their satisfaction must have been in Simon’s murder, or Piggy’s death, or the hunt for Ralph. The night that Simon died was full of frenzy and fear. Everyone joined in the dance, the chant, the cold-blooded murder. The next day Ralph realizes the damage they’ve done and what they’ve become. Piggy constantly says it was an accident, or defense but Ralph replies with, “That was Simon ... that was murder.” Then he whimpers, “I’m frightened. Of…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    One of the central themes in both William Golding’s ‘Lord of the Flies’ and Dennis Kelly’s ‘DNA’ is good and evil; both texts collectively offering a plethora of theories and ideas about the morals of humans and how they influence their actions. In ‘Lord of the Flies’ a group of British schoolboys are stranded on an island. Far away from the influence of adults, Golding creates a pseudo-civilisation in which he examines the actions of human beings and conveys his ideas of good and evil to the reader. Conversely, ‘DNA’ focuses on a group of twenty- first century teens, (still among a society) where their actions face physical consequences, who attempt to cover up a crime committed by their peers. Kelly, like Golding, addresses the universal morals of humanity, yet seems to be more questioning than axiomatic and certain about the nature of man and whether humans can be explicitly categorised into ‘good’ and ‘evil’. Both texts present the idea that there is both good and evil in the world. Golding demonstrates a clear segregation between characters that are ‘good’ and characters that are ‘evil’ and Kelly voices the opinion that the majority of humans have both of these traits installed in them. Although set in different time periods, the texts explore the fundamental ideas of ‘good’ and ‘evil’ in children and youths and whether this is fatalistically inherited or whether we act in the way we do as a result of situationism.…

    • 3707 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The boys hide their identities by covering their faces with paint, and wearing so called ‘masks’. When Jack and his gang cover themselves with paint they suddenly turn to savages. As they paint their faces they become different people,the paint hides their old identities and creates new ones. “Beside the pool his sinewy body held up a mask that drew their eyes and appalled them. He began to dance and his laughter became a bloodthirsty snarling. He capered toward Bill, and the mask was a thing on its own, behind which Jack hid, liberated from shame and self-consciousness. The face of red and white and black swung through the air and jigged toward Bill” (70). This quote is an excellent example of how the mask takes over Jack’s normal identity and turns him into an inhumane, animal-like creature.…

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As the boys are settling down onto the island, Jack and his choir group are ecstatic from their successful pig hunt, and are ready to tell Ralph all about it. Jack exclaims, “ ‘I cut the pig’s throat,’ said Jack, proudly, and yet twitched as he said it. ‘Can I borrow yours, Ralph, to make a nick in the hilt? The boys chattered and danced. The twins continued to grin” (69). Jack feels exhilaration from killing the pig, and asks Ralph to borrow his knife “to make a nick in a hilt”,and he is described as speaking “proudly, and yet twitched”. This provides a positive connotation that express his enthusiasm for the kill, and is an early characterization for Jack’s passion for killing. Jack’s manner while talking about using Ralph’s knife to make tally marks on his, shows that he is planning on more kills. As the number of pig kills increases, the boys on the island descend deeper into ferocity. Ralph gets mad at Jack and the choir for carelessly letting the signal fire go out; causing the ship to not see them. Jack argues back saying,“ ‘We needed meat’ Jack stood up as he said this, the bloodied knife in his hand. There was the brilliant world of hunting, tactics, fierce exhilaration, skill; and there was the world of longing and baffled common-sense. Jack transferred the knife to his left hand and smudged blood over his forehead as he pushed down the plastered hair” (71). Even as he states how important food is, the imagery in this passage vividly illustrates him as clutching the “bloodied knife in his hand”, a marker of savagery at the beginning of the reign bloodlust. Jack also “smudged blood over his forehead”, depicting how wild and uncivilized he has become. The situation as a whole shows his loss of humanity since first arriving on the island, as he previously…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Adversity In Night

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Literature provides a case in which people exploit the choices adversity presents. In William Golding’s Lord of the Flies, characters make choices that lead them astray from human conscience. Bestial cruelty replaces the selflessness one expects from survivors. The characters in Lord of the Flies relinquish their humanity while, as Golding describes, “The world, that understandable and lawful world, [is] slipping away” (122). Still, the adversity itself is not to blame. Rather, the boys of Lord of the Flies make conscious decisions regarding their behavior. In making these choices, the characters allow adversity to amplify the barbarism lurking within humanity. Adversity itself is only as barbaric as those it…

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jack and his tribe are hunting a wild boar in the forest, "The spear moved forward inch by inch and the terrified squealing became a high-pitched scream. Then Jack found the throat and the hot blood spouted over his hands. The sow collapsed under them" (135). He didn’t even think twice before slitting the pig's throat. Hunting has brought out the savage side of Jack which urges him to slaughter other living creatures. His sensitive emotions have temporarily flown out the window and his cruel personally has barged through the door. Jack has serious anger issues. He was upset with Wilfred without giving a solid reason as to why he was mad, “I don’t know. He didn’t say. He got angry and made us tie Wilfred up. He’s been-he giggled definitely-he’s been tied for hours, waiting.” (159). Now, even the slightest mistake will set off Jack. He is in control and if he says to have someone tied up or killed they will do it. Why? He is violent and intimidating and no one wants to question his authority. Jack is a stick of dynamite that is waiting to be lit. During the confrontation about Piggy’s glasses, “Jack made a rush and stabbed at Ralph's chest with his spear.” (177). Boy is this young child aggressive. Jack doesn’t even want to have a proper conversation with Raph. He wants to approach the situation with violence; long gone are those choir boy manners. What happened to the Jack who said they weren’t savages? His dominating and aggressive demeanor have gotten to his head, he has clearly gone power-mad. Jack is no longer a sweet and polite young man, he is fierce and…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The graphic, violent descriptions and imagery emphasise the idea that the boys no longer consider society or order, they are now only animalistic savages. This is demonstrated by Jack’s dedication to the kill and the ease with which he finishes his task, he “found the throat and the hot blood spurted over his hands”. The simple connective “and” implies a fast pace to his decisions, he did not think or take time to consider that he was taking a life, he just reached “and” killed. This is a stark contrast to his first attempt at killing a pig in chapter 1, in which…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays