Background
The concept of civil society was reinvented in the late 1980s in response to the rapid market development and the end of the Cold War. The collapse of the Soviet Union marked the rapid development of global market due to higher international security. Market development gradually leads to the development of civil society for two reasons: Firstly, the middle class helps to fight more freedom from the government as they want to gain more and more control of themselves. This situation, allows spaces for civil society to develop. Some donors search for NGOs to implement their civic or economic related interests and visions.1 Secondly, the retreat of the “welfare” states in western countries further triggers the emergence of civil society as people want to address the problem themselves instead of solely depending on the invisible hand of the free market.
Hong Kong, which is recognized as a newly industrialized economy (NIE) has adopted the minimal-interventionist principle in economic development for a long
Low tax rate and free market policies are the priorities of the Hong Kong government.
_____________________________________________________________________1 Howell, J. and Pearce, 2001, Civil Society and Development: A Critical, Exploration, Colorado: Lynne Rienner.time.
In order to keep the government expenditure at low level, NGOs began to flourish after the Second World War in the form of providing social services. Caritas is a prominent example. Organizations in civil society have served as agents for policy implementation for a long time. However, for policy formulation, the government is quite conservative in sharing power with civil society. Civil society is said to be very important in the implementation of democracy as civil society is a representation of diverse interests of the people.
In the planning system of Hong Kong, though the government was willing to involve more public
Bibliography: Bailey, N., Barker, A., & Macdonald, K, 1995, Partnership Agencies in British Urban Policy. London: UCL Press. p. 27. Butenhoff, L. 1999, Social Movements and Political Reform in Hong Kong, Westport, Conn. : Praeger. Chan, Elaine, and Joseph Chan. 2007. “The First Ten Years of the HKSAR: Civil Society Comes of Age.” Asian Pacific Journal of Public Administration 29 (June): 77–98. Cheung, Anthony B. L. 2000. “New Interventionism in the Making: Interpreting State Interventions in Hong Kong after the Change of Sovereignty.” Journal of Contemporary China 9 (July): 291-308. Friedmann, J. 1998. “The New Political Economy of Planning: The Rise of Civil Society”, pp19-35, in Douglass, M and Friedmann J. (eds.), Cities for Citizens, Chichwester: John Wiley & Sons. Fung, Archon, and Erik Olin Wright. 2001. “Deepening Democracy: Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance.” Politics and Society 29 (March): 5–41. Goodin, Robert E. 2003. “Democratic Accountability: The Distinctiveness of the Third Sector.” Archives Européennes de Sociologie 44 (December): 359–96. Howell, J. and Pearce, 2001, Civil Society and Development: A Critical, Exploration, Colorado: Lynne Rienner. Jessop, Bob. 1990. State Theory: Putting Capitalist States in Their Places. Cambridge: Polity Press. Jessop, Bob. 1999. “The Changing Governance of Welfare: Recent Trends in Its Primary Functions, Scale, and Modes of Coordination.” Social Policy and Administration 33 (December): 348–59. King, Y.C.A. 1975, “Administrative Absorption of Politics in Hong Kong: Emphasis on The Grass Roots Level”, Asian Survey, Vol.37, (8), pp.422-39. Ku, Agnes S. 1999. Narratives, Politics, and the Public Sphere: Struggles over Political Reform in the Final Transitional Years in Hong Kong (1992–94). Aldershot: Ashgate. Larry, Diamond. 2008. “Prospects for Hong Kong’s Democratization” in Hong Kong Journal. Miners, Norman. 1998. The Government and Politics of Hong Kong, 5th updated ed. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press. Mitlin, D. 2001, “The Formal and Informal Worlds of State and Civil Society: What Do They Offer to the Urbar Poor?”, International Planning Studies, Vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 377-92. Morris, Elizabeth Willson. 1998. “Urban Redevelopment and the Emerging Community Sector.” PhD diss., University of California at Berkeley. South China Morning Post. 2004a. Chloe Lai, “Double Unhappiness: Critics Oppose URA’s Plan to Raze ‘Wedding Card Street’.” 9 February. Swaminathan, M.S. 2000, “Government, Industry, Civil Society: Partnership in Integrated Gene Management: Volvo Environment Prize Lecture 1999”, Ambio, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 115-21. Turner, Matthew, and Irene Ngan, eds. 1995. Hong Kong Sixties: Designing Identity. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Arts Centre. Yue, R. 1997, “NGOs in Hong Kong: The Present and the Future”, Journal of Contemporary China, Vol. 6, No. 16, pp. 449-61.