Preview

Good Characteristics Of Canada's Bicameral System

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
910 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Good Characteristics Of Canada's Bicameral System
Canada has a fantastic government! The bicameral system makes a good characteristic of Canada! There are many benefits of using Canada’s bicameral system. First of all, the bill is thoroughly looked through to find any flaws or conflicts that might interfere with other laws. If there are any flaws contradicting law, the MP’s would have to change the bill so it would not contradict the law already set in place. The fact that there is more than one house is a benefit. With two rooms, (House of Commons and the Senate) you can get work done twice as fast than you could with one house. Once the bill is through the House of Commons, the Senate can take it right away and then the House of Commons can move on to the next bill. Also, the Senate adds …show more content…

This extra thought is needed to be sure that nothing was overlooked in the hectic House of Commons. One would say that the bicameral is a good system to run the government with, which makes it a great characteristic of Canada.

The second greatest characteristic of Canada is her great beauty and how she defines the opposite of an “eye sore”. Canada has many different terrains, and each of their characteristics adds a beautiful diversity between each landscape. I personally love visiting British Columbia. The tall majestic mountains, deep ravines, dark evergreen trees, the wet waterfalls and the Glacier Rivers all make me want to stay and never leave. The mountains make me feel safe, the sounds of the ever-flowing rivers lull me to sleep, and the evergreen trees that cover the mountains give me a burst of invigorating energy! I’ve seen Lake Louise, which is up in the mountains. The lake is very beautiful, with clear blue water, lush conifers surrounding the sides, and
…show more content…

Canada has a wide range of cultures from English, to Filipino, to Scottish to Ethiopians. Cultural diversity is an excellent characteristic for Canada to have because you get to meet people of other cultures and it broadens your views of how the rest of the world lives, not just how you live. Here’s an example: Me and my family decided to go to Birds Hill for the day. We packed a cooler full of food, our hammock, and our swim gear and set out for the beach. When we arrived we set up or hammock and cooler and settled down under the shade of a few trees. After a while, this woman came up to us and asked where we bought our hammock. We told her that my grandparents had brought it back with them from Paraguay when they were on vacation. My mom started talking with her, as all moms do, and soon found out that she was not from Canada, but she was actually from the Philippines! How cool! Later on, the aroma of fresh brewed coffee drifted past us. Our noses turned us around and there behind us was a family of what looked like Africans. They invited us over to try the coffee, along with the Pilipino woman, and engaged with us a conversation. We learned that they were Eritreans and Ethiopians, two different families coming together to escape to Canada. The story of their travels was frightening but intriguing. We learnt a lot that day, but the most important lesson was that even if people don’t look like

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Framers established a bicameral legislature for three reasons. First, they were familiar with the bicameral British Parliament. Second, a bicameral structure resolved conflicts between the Virginia and New Jersey plans. Third, the bicameral structure was meant to provide a system of checks and balances within the legislative branch itself.…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Eco Bottle Lab Report

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. The framers created a bicameral legislature because of the Great Compromise at the Constitutional Convention which stated that one house’s representation will be based on a state’s population and the other would have equal representation. Another reason is that it would help prevent tyranny because both houses can “check” each other to make sure one does not get to powerful. One power unique to the House of Representatives is that revenue bills must originate from the House; the framers gave this power to the House because the House of Representatives is more representative of the entire population than the Senate is. One power unique to the Senate is that they are the ones that try the President for impeachment; the framers gave this power to the Senate because they reflect the state’s interests and also because they are more “mature” than the House of Representatives since the required age is higher.…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Senate may have been critical and a good idea when Canada was first developing however, today the Senate has no real purpose. The leaders need reminder that the Constitution does not belong to the fender and provincial governments but to the people of Canada. The Senate does not represent all provinces equally, with BC, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba having 6 seats each, compared to Ontario and Quebec who have 24 seats each.…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Canada has been through a lot of struggles to become the country it is today. It had specifically had a lot of defining moments in the 20th century. Canada had taken part in a lot of wars and lost many people in the wars they fought. But the wars they fought had defined who they were in a country and how they dealt with it. It showed how they were willing to fight and lessons on what not to do next time.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    When Canada’s founders were thinking of Canada’s legislature system they valued accountability.[4] Unicameralism is a single legislative house or chamber and their just isn’t the same accountability as the bicameralism legislatures.[5] They did not want one “high-handed Cabinet” because this could pose a threat and to the founders this was “classic forms of autocracy.”[6] This is why bicameralism was introduced to the legislature. They were concentrated on checks on balances in the form of The Cabinet, the Commons, and the Senate, which were like the three branches of government.[7] What is funny is that the word “democracy” was used differently back in those days and they used mixed or balanced.[8] The Founders were viewed as being Liberal democrats because of them picking the bicameralism legislature over the unicamerlism legislature.[9] Also the Father’s visions were never for a “fusion of powers” in the legislature, but that the…

    • 3508 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    This system “is known for the separation of powers and for congressional committee system” (Dickerson & Flanagan, 1982). In relation to Prime Minister Harper’s plan for re-election, the election would be significantly different in a Presidential system. To start, the passing of the Fair Elections Act most likely would not have occurred due to the loose party discipline as well as the separation of powers leading to the opportunity of vetoing the bill – Explained further, “the president’s powers are restricted by not being a member of Congress… limited to exercising influence rather than authority over its members” (Dickerson & Flanagan, 1982). As a result, Harper would not have acquired an increased campaign budget or an extended campaign time which would have negatively affected his party’s chances of winning. If met with an issue that the majority of people disagreed on, great opposition of the President could cause a “full-blown regime crisis” (Linz, p. 65, 1990).…

    • 1639 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Canada and Germany are countries that have different political ideologies also they have some parts of government bear similarities.Although they are two different country, there are have three clear difference between two government systems they use.First, Canada has a three parts of parliament,with House of Common, Senate and Government Governor. In contrast, Germany only have two parts of parliament,with a Bundestag and Bundersrat.Secondly, Canada is president have power, but in Germany is Chancellor.Finally, compare advantage and disadvantage of two government system, Germany’s goverment system is more…

    • 87 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This new way of forming the Senate would randomly select Canadian citizens, bringing together people from all aspects of Canadian society. If one uses the Netherlands as an example of how to make selections, this approach would form a Senate from a pool of randomly selected citizens, employers, politicians, civil servants, and artists. As Chwalisz notes, other countries and cities around the world including Ireland, Australia, and Vancouver are implementing similar structures to form new kinds of government bodies and advisory committees. This kind of new representation in government would remove the elitism and partisanship the Senate is known for, and truly represent the diversity of Canada. It would also help to make the electorate feel more engaged in the democratic…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since 1945, there has been a single party majority government. Before the coalition, the government could control parliament due to its large majority, however we’ve seen a recent change in the relationship between the executive and legislature. The main issues that arise would be from the small majority of just 76 in the Commons, the lack of support from backbench MPs and fact that Cameron is the first Conservative Prime minister to not have a majority in the House of Lords. The Coalition of the Liberal Democrats and the Conservative party lacks both ideological and tribal unity, which would normally derive from a strong, single party majoritarian government. This provides Parliament with more opportunities to examine and scrutinize the government.…

    • 787 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    that Canada as a whole would lose that part of its history. Quebec does not…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Canadian Senate Essay

    • 1927 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The Canadian Senate has often been referred to as the sober second thought. The house of commons was originally set up to have two chambers, the upper and the lower, to carefully decide Canadian laws. The Senate, in the upper house, reviews proposed legislation and ultimately decides whether a bill becomes a law. They are responsible for protecting the interests of Canadians, in all regions, and of all minorities.1 Recently however, there has been a big concern for more accountability. Many…

    • 1927 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    canadian geography

    • 661 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In Canada we have a very diverse and unique geography that has molded the way Canadians live, act and get by day to day. I believe that despite the fact that all the regions of Canada diversely different creating the argument that we have no actual national identity because of some provinces that feel they should be independent and become their own countries, though there are many there are many people who would want provinces like Quebec to be their own country i believe Canada wouldn’t be its own unique country without all of its provinces, territories and regions Canada wouldn’t be the country it is today because of its vasts landscapes that are filled with great resources that have kept our country afloat by being able to trade through our large borders and coastlines.…

    • 661 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bicameral Senate Power

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Our Founding Father’s created a bicameral legislature for three reasons: First, it was what they knew, their ideologies came from Britain. The British Parliament has two houses; the House of Commons and the House of Lords (Shmoop Editorial Team).…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Immigration creates diversity in Canada. Immigration and diversity is what Canada is known for all around the world. As it says in the Canadian Multiculturalism Act, "It is hereby declared to be the policy of the Government of Canada to foster the recognition and appreciation of the diverse cultures of Canadian society and promote the reflection and the evolving expressions of those cultures." The Canadian Multiculturalism Act was made July 1988; Canadian governments are reflecting society's increasing willingness to accept differences within the population. This just shows how much Canada values the difference cultures and the diversity of its nation. Immigration establishes a well known social environment; it brings together all sorts of different people with unique skills and allows for people to become more interactive with the world around them. Canadians value diversity for enriching cultural expression and making daily life more varied and interesting. Businesses and employers recognize that diversity in the workplace promotes innovation, stimulates teamwork and creativity and helps expand markets for goods and services . Canada receives different types of people, who bring with them unique characteristics and cultural background, which in hand diversifies the Canadian nation. As immigrants arrive into Canada they create an identity which creates an identity for Canada. As Jean Chrétien once said, "Canada has become a post-national, multicultural society. It contains the globe within its borders, and Canadians have learned that their two international languages and their diversity are a comparative advantage and a source of continuing creativity and innovation. Canadians are, by virtue of history and necessity open to the world." Canada has made its name known around the world by opening itself to the…

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people came to Canada because they thought it was a country of opportunity to them. If you were to look into Canada’s history, you might say Canada was not a land of opportunity for all groups. Gender, race, religion and education were all very important aspects that shaped Canada’s history. These four categories weren’t respected and treated with care. This is why gender, race, religion and education are still a problem within our country today.…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays