Preview

Govt Ch 13

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
414 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Govt Ch 13
Chapter 13 You Decide Exercise
Write out your answers and submit them using the Dropbox in a RTF or Word Doc format. Presidential Power and Iraq This exercise relates to the Policy Debate in Chapter 13 dealing with Iraq and Presidential Power. The goal of this exercise is to give you a better understanding of recent Supreme Court rulings on the limits of Presidential power during wartime and the importance of Separation of Powers and Checks and Balances. The Constitution (as interpreted by the Supreme Court) balances the need for security against the need for freedom and human rights. You will read and discuss two articles from the Christian Science Monitor, the goal of which will give you a better understanding of the limits on Presidential power and the importance of freedom.

Read this article http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A13350-2004Jun28.html from The Washington Post.

1. What impact did the rulings have on the Bush Administration's anti-terrorism tactics?

2. What does Justice O'Connor mean when she argues that a "state of war is not a blank check for the president when it comes to the rights of the nation's citizens?"

3. Read this Washington Post article http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/29/AR2006062900928.html

Explain why Osama Bin Laden's driver could not be tried as a terrorism suspect. What requirement would the Bush administration need to fulfill before it can try Hamdan as a terrorist?

4. Some Bush administration officials have argued that harsh interrogation tactics are needed and recent reports reveal that hundreds (if not thousands) of prisoners have been tortured in Guantanamo, Iraq and Afghanistan. Read the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution (found in the appendix of your text.) Do you think the framers would have wanted the President to be able to indefinitely lock up prisoners without a hearing?

5. In response to the court rulings, Congress passed a 2006 law giving President

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Chap 16 Govt 2302

    • 1525 Words
    • 7 Pages

    8. The rise of Napster in the 1990s and other music exchange services demonstrates 1. that new technologies have made it more difficult for the government to protect property.…

    • 1525 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ap Government Court Cases

    • 6581 Words
    • 27 Pages

    3. The Supreme Court decided that even though the executive order was on the shady side of the Constitution, it was justified because they were in a time of “emergency and peril”.…

    • 6581 Words
    • 27 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ch. 10 AP Gov FRQs

    • 1397 Words
    • 6 Pages

    1. A) The problem with the election in 1800 was that it wasn’t much of an “election” at all. Newspapers, at the time, were mostly partisan, and weren’t concerned with telling the truth all the time. Also, because of their lack in technology, campaigning was almost impossible for presidential candidates, so not much was done to campaign their running of office. Bottom line, there were NO primaries, NO nominating conventions, NO candidate speeches, and NO entourage of reporters. The 1896 election’s main problems came from our precious medals. The Republican’s major issue was to support for the gold standard and high tariffs. It linked money to the scarce amount of gold so debtors never got a break from inflation. The Democrats, on the other hand, had the issue of unlimited coinage of sliver. The issue with the 2000 election was that they overruled the Florida Supreme Court and held that more precise and consistent standards for evaluating ballots would have to be applied to all counties. What came with that, was they also ruled that there wasn’t enough time to recount all the ballots before the electors were to vote, so they never really knew who really won the election, just what the U.S. Supreme Court ruled.…

    • 1397 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    2. While the United States was fighting for the ideals of democracy during World War II, there were examples of liberties taken away by the U.S. government. Which of the following was the best example of this?…

    • 696 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Truman’s involvement with the Korean War is another example of how past presidential practices have not maintained the Constitution’s original intent between the balance of power and limits. In deciding to go to war against North Korea, Truman acted unilaterally and never even sought Congress’s authorization. He did not even seek retroactive approval. Indeed, “President Truman had altered the Constitution by taking the country to war against North Korea without either formal declaration or statutory authorization, relying instead on resolutions passed by the UN Security Council.” In his work, John Yoo persistently quotes that James Madison, “wanted to prevent the president from using his war powers to enhance his overall power and importance…

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    4. What does the Supreme Court considered protected free speech? Give examples. What speech is not protected?…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since the beginning, the relationship between the presidency and Congress has been a difficult one. The framers put into place a system of checks and balances to help make sure that there would always be such a struggle. The distinctive “tension between one branch writing laws and budgets and the other branch carrying out the laws and spending the money has been” (Professional Development) an essential characteristic of the American government. Although the Constitution gives Congress, the power to declare war and omit money for troops and weapons, presidents stay given a broad leeway to defend the nation and wage war. Presidents have stretched this power to move without congressional approval through military interventions.…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There are two perspectives on presidential power. The two perspectives are presidential power by persuasion and presidential without persuasion or unilateral. The first perspective where presidential power is persuasive means that the president needs help in order to achieve an outcome. The president tries to convince other branches of government or other high-ranking officials to implement an idea of his. This all depends on the president’s ability to bargain with other branches or even his own branch to influence policy. The Unilateral perspective means that the president can act alone when making policy decisions. The unilateral perspective forces the judiciary to react.…

    • 141 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dbq 7

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. Condone what the information says in documents C/D on how the black man can be trusted with a gun and go to war, but then not be trusted to vote and buy land. Then go to the point of view of the secretary and show how his right contradicts the right of the black man.…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The two perspectives on Presidential power are power as persuasion and unilateral power. Since Presidents’ power is to persuade, they have far less formal power than the necessary to meet the large expectations over them. Presidents take to office their goals and expectations for public policy, but to accomplish these, they must work with the Congress. Congress and the presidency were created to avoid one single institution from having control over policymaking. Presidents’ power involves the bargaining that derives from their position, reputation, prestige and reputation (Howell). They make their personal impact on the choices of what should be said or done, how and when.…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Over two hundred years ago people were asking how powerful should the president be? Is he too powerful now? Today, in the twenty-first century, political scientist, constituent, and even politicians are asking the same questions. One of the most notable debates over this subject stems from a disagree between Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson. Hamilton preferred a larger executive while Jefferson preferred a smaller one. When George Washington declared neutrality during a war between Britain and France, Jefferson did not believe that Washington had the constitutional power to do this. Hamilton decided to respond; he did so by publishing articles under the pseudonym, Pacificus.…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cited: Adler, David. “The Constitution and Presidential War-making.” The Constitution and the Conduct of American Foreign Policy. University Press of Kansas, 1996 183-226.…

    • 2492 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Staab, J. B. (2008). The war on terror 's impact on habeas corpus: The constitutionality of the military commission’s act of 2006. Journal of the Institute of Justice and International Studies, (8), 280-297. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/213962970?accountid=32521…

    • 2163 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1) Admiral George Dewey once said, "the office of President is not such a very difficult one to fill, his duties being mainly to execute the laws of Congress." Do you agree or disagree with this statement. Explain why.…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    First Amendment Paper

    • 1399 Words
    • 6 Pages

    How do the Supreme Court decisions in each case continue to affect the rights of American Citizens today?…

    • 1399 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays