Preview

Grains Of Paradise Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
734 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Grains Of Paradise Analysis
Grains

Grains of Paradise was a short story created before it was adapted into a motion picture. In the book a man by the name of Cordell Hoyle went to Mexico to gather specimens to kick off his new chili business. When Cordell arrived he was eventually challenged to a chili pepper eating contest. He could have won, but he chose not to, he let the restaurant owner who challenged him win; this in turn helped the restaurant owner keep his dignity, and It helped his friend win the girl over. I believe that the movie was better than the book.

THEME
The theme of the story was doing the right thing is more important than winning; I thought the movie did a better job of showing this. I say this because, the movie showed the tension when Cordell’s
…show more content…
My first reason is; the movie again had more visuals than the book. Expanding on this; the movie had more scenery to show the viewer where the story takes place. Additionally, the movie also showed the the time era it took place in through setting; this in turn gives the viewer a better idea of how to perceive the story in this aspect. Second the movie had the advantage of being able to show what was going on through setting. My first reason being the movie showed the position of the characters and their behavior; this in turn displayed the tension through setting. Moreover, the movie also showed the main character’s whereabouts better through visual transitions. Last but not least, the movie showed more setting changes than the book. The book could only tell the reader that there was a change in the setting; these are usually major changes; the movie could show the more subtle ones, adding to the quality of the experience. The movie also set the mood better than the book through setting changes or adjustments. Concluding this; I believe the movie expressed the setting better than the …show more content…
first, the characters could visually be seen eliminating any plot holes that the reader may have falsely perceived. For example, the reader may have envisioned an inactive character to not be in the scene and when they were mentioned it could be throw the reader off. Moreover, the reader could confuse the characters names because they have no visual reference to associate them with. Second, the characters had more personality expressed because they weren’t limited to being described by words. Furthermore, they were able to express moods and facial expressions visually. On the other hand, the book would have to describe these details. Finally the characters could express body language better than than in the book. The book was limited to only the use of words to describe what was going on, the movie was not making it easier for characters to express their reactions to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    The differences are subtle, but they are all there. One difference between the two are the order of events. Certain scenes, such as Paul and Albert's injuries, the French girls and Paul's leave, are all done in different orders in both the movie and book. In the book, the scenes play out like this; first the boys meet the French girls, then Paul has his leave and then finally Paul and Albert get injured However, in the movie the events play out as so; The boys meet the French girls (n this particular sequence of events meeting the French girls happens first, however, in the movie that scene is shown later then in the book), then Paul and Albert get injured, and then finally Paul has his leave. This difference is very trivial as it doesn't change anything significantly, however it is a pretty striking…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ever read a book, and then seen the movie? The book is usually better right? That’s most likely because of the differences. The book is more descriptive most of the time. Events in the book are missing from the movie. Or the movie adds some in.…

    • 219 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Movies and books are always different; in a movie you can show multiple characters, and in most books you're stuck in one character's narrative. For instance in the book The Giver the character Fiona doesn’t care about Jonas as deeply as she does in the movie. In the movie she stops her injections, and she starts to love Jonas. However in the book she only “enjoys having Jonas’s company”. In the movie she also helps Jonas steal Gabe before he is killed, and she is put in the community jail for helping him. Before she is going to be released she talks about how she has felt things. That she knows what it is like to truly feel, and in the book she isn’t this unorthodox.…

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The movie has some similar and different things than the book. The differences are more important than the similarities. .There are way more differences than similarities.The book is Better than the…

    • 283 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another reason that the movie is better than the book is because it’s longer and tells more of the story. For example in the book all that happened was he was taking his wife…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Contemplate the fact that in the book, no women are present at the end of the novel, but in the film, women play a role in the reconstruction of the new society. Possibly, this difference reflects that the book was written in 1953, whereas the film was made 14 years later.…

    • 359 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The book was a better representation because it had more story and depth for developing characters which is key for readers to enjoy a story. Also readers can tell what characters are thinking in a book, and it is easier to understand them, while in the movie there is just dialogue. In the movie, it did not show all of the hardships Ender faced in becoming a commander. For Ender’s final simulation at command, without knowing, he destroyed a whole planet of Buggers who were just hopelessly defending their planet. The book made it clear of one theme, always know who the real enemy is before attacking because it could just end up being a futile…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Slow And steady wins the race Is a common theme. Theme is the lesson or moral in a story, novel or movie. The movie Home Alone And the short story Ransom of Red Chief have several common themes. The first theme for home alone And Ransom of Red Chief is…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The book was better than the movie on account of it had way more details, and it had more parts in it than the movie did. It is extremely time-consuming to fit an entire book in a less than two hour long movie, but authors and readers can produce a book as long as you want. Although the movie took a shorter time to watch than reading the book did, the readers can retrieve more from a book than they can retrieve from watching a movie. Even in movies that into feeling by the book scene for scene there is still less detail in the movie than there is in the book.…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    First of all, one of the biggest reasons the movie is better than the book is because of the quality of the flashbacks. In the book the flashbacks were more set in the past and much longer, sometimes too drawn out and a little boring for how much background story there is for just one day dream, whereas in the movie the daydreams are a bit shorter but more set in the present and more affect by what he does in that moment with little background because of how short they are and how close to the present they may be. The daydreams are usually much more exciting in the movie as well, whereas in the book it's set back to just a boring doctor surgery, that was…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    One thing in particular that the book does much better is making use of complex metaphors and themes, such as: the river for life, and oneness with nature, that string themselves together as you turn each page of the book, while in the movie the metaphors and symbolism are represented in a much different way through picture. In the book, both themes regarding the river are very vivid and clear, as they use strong imagery of nature to draw pictures in the minds of the readers. In the movie both themes are represented and referred to much less because of the lack of narration.…

    • 1118 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Outsiders

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the movie you could actually see what Tulsa, OK looked like because in the book you could picture a Slump, trailer, bad neighbor hood. But the house really wasn’t in as bad as shape as I thought it would be. The difference between the people was because you could see the difference on the street. Like who they were, how old, if they were a Greaser or a Soc. Although some people didn’t really show who they were. But in the book, you can see it, but not like picture it as well. It the movie makes it bolder because you see, hear, and almost feel what’s going on. You can actually see the people doing these things, on the other hand, in the book you can read it, but not feel it. You can also see their surroundings. What’s behind the scenes. Where they’re at, and wherever they’re at, you can tell which side of town. Both the book and the movie had great descriptions on what their side was like, Socs had it all, and Greasers had nothing. Like maybe the Greasers had old cars and the Socs had brand new cars.…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Crucible

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Why I think the moviemaker chose those difference between the book and the movie was because in the book there was a narrator to tell you specific things. The narrator is there to tell some background information and make sure you get a better grasp of what’s taking place. So I feel as if in the movie they wanted you to pay closer attention to what was happening. And you have to have some differences between the two. While in the movie you can see more action and can sometimes explain things better by acting out, rather than being written out.…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In my opinion the book had many advantages over the movie, the book could describe to us how the character was actually feeling, or what they were thinking. The author could also get his feelings toward the characters, and the setting, by simply writing it and telling you how it was supposed to be. Although this was an advantage, it could also be a disadvantage, Fitzgerald could only use dialogue, no visuals in the book. In the movie, I felt as though I had to keep guessing, as to what the character was thinking or feeling. Although the movie gave a more visual depiction of the characters and…

    • 1656 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    One reason I like the book more than the movie is that the movie leaves out some very important scenes out of the plot. For example, one very important part left out by the movie is the very beginning of the story, when the main character has something traumatising happen to him. I think that was a mistake not having it in the movie.…

    • 232 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays