Preview

Greek Government Vs Roman Government

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
171 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Greek Government Vs Roman Government
Briefly discuss how the governments of Rome and Carthage differed
Both Carthage and Rome are both strong in military even though there are differences, similarities between the structure of government of Carthage and Rome cannot be over emphasized. This writing is focused on differences on differences between the two governments.
Carthage government is Oligarchy system of government, since the government is in the hands of few wealthy citizens. While Roman government can be said to be more of democratic rule because the decision making is in the hands of the citizen. Further more, the relationship between Rome and Greeks is a catalyst for representative government practiced by the Rome.
In conclusion, it is important to know that difference

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Ancient Greece was divided into many different areas, called city-states. There were many city-states throughout the entire country, and each one had its own government. Athens and Sparta were two of the most powerful city-states in Greece. Sparta was governed by the military, while Athens had a democratic government. Over time, people's opinions about what made a good government changed, and various types of governments developed as well.…

    • 535 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Roman and Greece empires governments were similar in ways but differed in others. While both Romans and Greeks started as mere city states they went off in different directions with there civilizations politically. They also both had democracies but in different forms. They each had there own way of government and had different military styles, largely because of their location, which is also why Rome was more centralized and Greece was more dispersed. However, geography did not stop both Rome and Greece from being patriarchal, and thriving.…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rome and the US Government similar/different are that both roman republic and United States have a tripartite system. That means the government is made up of three branches. The three branches are legislative, judicial, and executive. Both governments have the power to veto. Veto means "i forbid" in the United States only the president has the power to veto.…

    • 191 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The respective form of government of Rome and Carthage has an "outward similarity" in terms of structure. If Rome has two consuls, Carthage on other hand has two chief magistrates called as suffetes. Carthaginians have also a legislative body such like the Roman Senate which is called the hundreds or "the counsel of thirty Nobles" (Mackay, 1999). In addition, it has also a citizen assembly similar to Rome's comitia (Moray,1901). In governmental organization the two two great nations were parallel to each other, however in terms of the internal affairs of their respective states they were entirely antipodal.…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    One of the differences in the government of the United States and ancient Rome is the United States has a two party system, Democrats and Republicans, but Romans had an emperor. Within our two party systems a president is elected into office and the Romans chose an emperor based on their social status. Our president serves a four-year term and no more than two terms. Emperors had no term limits and served for life.…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Democracy is a type of government that is meant to give power to the people and give them control over their government and allow their voice to be heard. The democracy in Greece was incredibly direct, citizens could vote on each individual thing, however to be qualified as a citizen you had to be a male born of Athenian parents, all citizens could hold positions of power and their roles were chosen based on chance. As a citizen you were able to participate in votes and your voice was heard giving you a great impact on the government, however the requirements for citizenship caused people who were not citizens to have little say, for them the votes weren’t democratic. Unlike Greece, Rome had a representative democracy, the citizens of Rome, both plebeians and patricians could vote on who they wanted to represent them, however only patricians could hold positions of power. The Roman republic had three tiers, patricians could hold positions in all three, while it took many years for Plebeians to be able to hold all the positions of power. When we consider democracy to be based based on the say of the people, Rome was more democratic compared to Greece.…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Since Ancient Greece was spread out into the individual city-states, it forced them to each have their own forms of government. Their governments ranged from military rule to dictatorship to democracies. In Athens under the rule of Pericles, their government was a democracy. Any man over the age of 18, who wanted to, could be involved and got paid for being part of the government like people do today. This influenced our government because although we do nat participate directly in day to day government functions, we participate indirectly. Athens also had a jury, who in trials made the final decisions, like we do today. You also had the magistrates, who went out ald enforced the laws like we have police officers do today. Ancient Greeks have…

    • 136 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rome a. Definition of citizenship changed over time b. Pragmatic innovation and adaptation as empire's ideals c. Common language was Latin C. Patterns of imperial expansion 1. Both consolidated their power within their environmental limits using a common legal framework 2. They had different patterns of development, types of public servants, and government practices 3.…

    • 1086 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rome vs. Athens

    • 2657 Words
    • 11 Pages

    The Roman republic and Athenian polis were two great experiments in political philosophy in the ancient world. These two distinctly different methods of running a nation in both Athens and Rome have one similarity – that they were founded on the intent to give common law and justice to the people. That aside both of the nations, which will be discussed in this essay, was culturally, economically and historically quite different and approached the issue of statecraft in a very different and sometimes contradictory manner. Both of these republics – the Roman and Athenian were regarded to be in their time two of the most powerful nations in the world – the Roman republic after the 2nd Punic war and the Athenian republic at the age of its most famous ruler Pericles. But how did these two nations, so different in their approach to life and philosophy itself, fall ultimately by their own system, which had served them for so long? They fell to the oligarchies that they were built and inte The Roman and Athenian republican both had a loathing (perhaps the Roman more so) for kingship and oligarchy in any of its forms. The republic fell to the whims of dictators such as the Triumvirs, Caesar and Sulla who abused its system, and Athens fell prey to tyrants using the turmoil after the Peloponnesian war to their advantage. One major similarity between the two nations is that they both had a growing degree of imperialism late in their republican period. The Athenian, abusing the rewards of the Delian league built to defend the common interest of Greece against the Persian empire, ended up with an empire which its’ small and inefficient form of statecraft was not equipped to manage. The Roman also found the same issue, which arose, like the Athenians, initially from a need for simple, honest self-defense. The two quotes below indicate the troubled and desperate issues that lead to the creation of these…

    • 2657 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Roman Government

    • 2157 Words
    • 9 Pages

    What Influence did Gaius Julius Caesar and Augustus have on the reforms of the government from a Republic to an Empire?…

    • 2157 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Carthage originally was a colony of Tyre. It was the first foreign power with whom the Rome encountered which was outside of the Italy. There were some of the similarities in the government of the Rome and the Carthage. For example, there were two chief magistrates (suffetes), similar to the Roman consuls. Moreover, the Carthage had the council of elders which is known as the "hundred" like as the Senate of the Romans. Additionally, the Carthage also had the assembly which is similar to the Comitia of Rome. Even though we can figure out the outward similarities between the Rome and the Carthage but they were very much different in their spirit.…

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    8th Grade Paper

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The ancient Greek Democracy and the ancient Roman Republic are different in some ways. They are mainly different because they give people the different ways of voting whether it’s voting on directly on an issue or voting for a representatives. The Roman Republic had 300 elected officials on the other hand, the Greek Democracy just had a small assembly. The Greek Democracy had an autonomy, meaning they were self governed. In conclusion, they both gave freedom to their people but just had a different types of systems.…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Different from the Greek government the Roman Republic was controlled by the Senate. The Senate Allowed all the laws and kept all the money. The Senate was only ruled by wealthy people called Patricians. Different from the U.S government because we only have one ruler ( the president) and he doesn’t have to be wealthy. At first , kings ruled over Greece and Rome but then citizens formed a democracy. Later on that lead on to city-states . The Roman and Greek empires are both alike and different in ways.…

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Roman Government

    • 1305 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Although the form of government in the Roman Empire changed several times over its thousand year history, many parts remained the same and it has served as a model, inspiring the founding fathers as they created the governmental system of the United States of America almost 2,000 years later. Scattered around seven hills in the middle of the Italian peninsula, Rome began as a simple village of wooden huts. As it grew, it became governed by a monarchy, with a king having complete control. This lasted for over 200 years until the king was overthrown and a republic form of government was developed. Although controlled to a large extent by wealthy land owners and nobles, the general population was given an increasingly larger part in how the empire was run. This form of government worked well and the Roman Empire prospered. However, social unrest in the first century A.D., coupled with several military defeats, ended with Julius Caesar taking control and declaring himself dictator for life, ending the true republic form of government. Assassinated a month later, Rome then entered a period of rule by an emperor, which lasted until the fall of the Roman Empire in 476 A.D. The Roman Empire lasted longer than any other government in the western world and it has provided the foundation upon which the government of the United States is based, along with providing valuable lessons for future generations.…

    • 1305 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many democracy-governed countries, like Australia are based on the laws and policies of the Ancient Greek democracy. The word democracy originated from the Greek words; demos meaning people and crata meaning rule, together meaning people rule. Ancient Greece and Australia, compared are very similar, but also have their own policies and way of doing things. The two countries are governed by democracy, however are governed by two different systems. The Australian system is the representative democracy, which means citizens of Australia vote for a Prime Minister to make important decisions on behalf of the country. You must be over 18 to vote and Federal elections are held every three years. On the other hand, the Greek system was a direct democracy, meaning that the free men of Greece would make the laws and policies of the country. They met every nine days or sooner if necessary. The meetings had to exceed 6,000 people before these meetings where allowed to begin. Was and is democracy a fair system of government.…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays