Preview

Greene's Jewelry Wholesale Case Summary

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1287 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Greene's Jewelry Wholesale Case Summary
TO: Greene’s Jewelry Wholesale
FROM: Alyssa Ascher
DATE: April 16th, 2017
RE: Greene’s Jewelry Wholsale – Wrongful Termination of Employee and Employee Breach of Contract Claims

QUESTIONS PRESENTED
(1)Under New Hampshire law, can Greene’s Jewelry Wholesale be held accountable for terminating Jennifer’s employment as the company is downsizing and has no need for her position anymore?

(2)Under New Hampshire law, can Jennifer be held accountable for sharing Greene’s Jewelry Wholesale’s trade secret with Howell, as she signed a confidentiality agreement in which she agreed she would not disclose any information that she might acquire from Greene’s regarding their process to create Ever-Gold?

SHORT ANSWERS
(1)Probably yes. The reason given
…show more content…
If Greene's can provide evidence that they did not fill Jennifer's position with another qualified individual, then they may find that the termination was lawful and rule in favor of Greene's Jewelry Wholesale.
Based on the facts in issue two, the court will probably find that the confidentiality agreement is no longer valid after an employee has been terminated unless a time frame for which the agreement is active is stated in the contract. If the time frame is stated, and the agreement is valid beyond an employees termination, then the court will probably rule in favor of Greene's Jewelry Wholesale.
Public perception of Greene's Jewelry Wholesale may be affected by the situation when it comes to hiring future employees. Should a perspective employee feel that the company let Jennifer go under wrongful termination, they may be hesitant to work for Greene’s as they know the company has a history of terminating employees for unjust reasons. Going forward Greene’s may want to create a statement explaining their intentions in terminating Jennifer’s employment so that the public has a better understanding of the situation from Greene’s perspective. In the futue, Greene’s could make sure not to breech any laws regarding discrimination when terminating an employee so as to protect themselves against any sort of legal claims involving

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Case Scenario: Grocery Inc., Presentation Glenn Devillier, Cara Birritteri, Richardson Fong and Nilson Goncalves Introduction  Review Case Studies:  Grocery Inc. Uniform Commercial Code  Grocery Inc. Renovations  Grocery Inc. (Jeff)  Gap Filing Rule (Cereal Inc.)  Harry and Tom Breach of Contract  Grocery Inc.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In this case, WIRETIME has committed a Tortious Interference with Existing Contractual Relationship Tort. WIRETIME had encouraged Janet to break the existing contract with BUGusa for their employment. WIRETIME had precise knowledge of and literally saw the contract. They actively hindered the contract and caused losses to due to training a replacement for Janet.…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mr. McCart opened a tax preparation business and executed a contract with Block to be a district manager, which precluded him from operating a tax business in the same city. McCart then issued the city franchise to his wife. Years later, the wife signed a new franchise agreement, which contained a covenant not to compete. The wife terminated the agreement and H&R Block reissued the franchise; however, McCart continued to operate a tax preparation service in the city. H&R Block filed suit and the trial court enjoined McCart from operating in the city and McCart sought review. The court affirmed because it was not necessary to show that McCart signed the agreement before enjoining him from assisting the breach of the agreement by his wife and the evidence supported the finding that they acted together to breach her agreement with H&R Block.…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    WIRETIME’s Human Resource Manager is in breach of intentional tort for promising Janet a Lead position and ten percent raise plus a signing bonus of $5,000 if Janet agrees to work for WIRETIME, Inc. Janet told the Manager she had two years left on her current contract. The Human Resource Manager’s attempt to persuade Janet to abandon the contract and accept employment at WIRETIME was intentional. Under the term of the contract, Janet’s termination or her decision to quit meant she could not accept employment at another competitor of BUGusa Inc. The fact these companies are competitors, the Human Resource Manager at WIRTIME, Inc. under assumption should be aware that this is overstepping since it is most likely WIRETIME, Inc. makes their employees sign noncompeting agreements. A Human Resource Manager of a competing company should very much be aware of the rules and guidelines relating to…

    • 915 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    BUGusa Essay Example

    • 660 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Reading the article I’ve found that WIRETIME, Inc., has not committed any torts because they didn’t do anything wrong they are just seeking employment. Now for Janet she did commit a tort by breaking the contract and going to work for the competitor company.…

    • 660 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Introduction Collins was hired as Head Chef at the Marrimount Hotel and believed that this job came with the inherent authority to choose his assistant chefs, even though nothing of this was mentioned in the contract for employment. Therefore, when Crest, owner of the Marrimount, attempted to determine Collins 's assistants, Collins quit his job and went to work for the Treadwell Center. The contract It may actually be good for Collins to argue that there was no contract between himself and Crest. First, there was no detailed employment agreement, just a letter signifying the contract terms. The letter referred to itself as a contract lasting for “five years from the signature thereof.” However, presumably it was never signed and therefore never consummated. Secondly, Collins could argue that this is an agreement in violation of the statute of frauds, since it requires more than one year to perform and was not signed. Therefore, if Collins argues that he never signed nor agreed to the contract terms, perhaps he can avoid, altogether, the issues of breach of fiduciary duty and the injunction against working for a competitor. However, it seems evident that both Collins and Crest considered the agreement to be a binding employment contract. This is not merely an oral agreement to be finalized at a later date, as was the case in Tropicana Hotel Corporation v. Speer. Collins demonstrated an immediate intent to be bound by the agreement by moving to New York from Atlanta and performing for a year under the contract. Therefore, since it is likely that the court will find a five-year contract existed and the contract was breached, the question becomes who is liable for the breach? III. Who breached first? The facts are undisputed that Collins left the kitchen upon the hiring of an unacceptable pastry chef. This would likely constitute a breach of…

    • 2666 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Study: Citynet, LLC

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Issue: The issue in the case problem 12-7 is between Ray Toney, an employee, and Citynet, LLC, the employer. Citynet had promised their employees that if they left they could cash out their entire vested balance (Miller, 2015, pp. 303). When Toney terminated his employment with Citynet he asked for his vested balance but they refused to provide all the money to him (Miller, 2015, pp. 303). Because of this Toney filed a suit against them stating they had breached the contract. Rule of Law:…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Legal Memorandum

    • 1316 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Brett received his assignments from the customer service department. He had no contact with customers as any part of his job. After two years of working for Finance R Us, he received a job offer to do the same type of work at Titles Unlimited. He would again, have no contact with customers and receive his assignments from the customer service department. Finance R Us sues Brett for breach of contract due to violating the restrictive covenant in the employment contract.…

    • 1316 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jones V. Tsige Case Study

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Had the OCA not recognized the tort of intrusion upon seclusion in the case of Jones v. Tsige, Jones would have had to sue her employer for compensation under PIPEDA, as BMO is a federally regulated organization, and Jones would not have had a case to sue Tsige directly. This brings the concern of to what extent are employers liable through vicarious liability for their employees actions and to what extent have they created and communicated company policies and procedures. Jones is…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Studies

    • 1656 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Issue: Can Mrs. Mitchell be award unemployment compensation if she violated rules in the work, which would lead to misconduct?…

    • 1656 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In my opinion Nichols, was in violation of Garelli Wong’s claim because of the disclosure agreement he had signed while under their employ. Contracts are binding and that is the smoking gun, and that being the case Nichols was in direct violation of that contract, for this reason alone the courts should have found in favor of Garelli Wong, Inc.…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Contracts

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages

    3. Assuming a breach of contract has or will occur, what remedies does Ms Woodside have after the breach?…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Employers must understand that the persons who evaluate and decide the outcome of employment discrimination cases (the EEOC investigator, federal or state judge, and/or jury) have keen senses of fairness and expect that employees will be treated in a fair manner. As a result, employers are exposed to substantial liability for any acts, including perceived acts, of discrimination in the workplace. Employers should take any charge of discrimination seriously and the employer must keep in mind that, at a minimum, it needs to have a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason for taking the action in question. In addition, an employer's response will be evaluated by persons who have a different perspective than the employer. What…

    • 964 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Discussion Board

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages

    2. Explain Martinez’s reasoning that the confidentiality agreement is so broadly worded as to represent a restriction on her exercise of some…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ursula's Fault Essay

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Despite the warning signs, everyone that knew Ursula as a child believed she was a happy little girl. And, for the most part, she was. She loved doing many things, and many perceived her as a bundle of sunshine. But there was also something that was seemingly off about her. For the most part, it wasn’t even her fault.…

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays