Guadalcanal Argumentative Analysis

On December 7, 1941, America entered the Second World War, when Japan attacked US ships at Pearl Harbor. Even though the Nazis were defeated in May of 1945, the Japanese were relentless in their imperialistic pursuit to show their power. There was already a power struggle between the Japanese, Chinese, and Russia. But in 1941, they even challenged America, which brought the US into the war. The struggle for Guadalcanal, in August of 1942, initiated by the US marines and lasting for several months, US forces realized the ruthlessness of the Japanese troops, with their banzai and suicidal bayonet attacks at night.
To the Japanese leaders, Okinawa as their last hope of their homeland against an invasion, so they were prepared to battle to the death. The Japanese army, determined to fight to the death, in battle after battle, using terrorist-type banzai and kamikaze attacks, was not merely a military strategy. These maneuvers were deeply rooted in Japanese culture. The audacity of the Japanese troops, spurred on by cultural and military ideology, plus the heavy casualties already inflicted,
There are compelling arguments on both sides. According to our military leaders, peace at that point might have been achieved by negotiation. The Japanese navy no longer existed, fuel and spare parts were on short supply, and they were losing with China. The Japanese people were starving under the blockade. The Emperor put Japan under Martial Law, anticipating a revolt by the people to end the war. Yet, what were the reasons for using this new weapon of mass destruction? For sure, it would mean a quick end to a long, bloody war, which everyone wanted. But, maybe Truman wanted to send a message to Russia and China, who without a doubt would be the next enemies the U.S. would have to contend with. An invasion would have cost many more American lives, and the people were tired of the