Preview

Gun Control In Australia Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
359 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Gun Control In Australia Essay
People say that although the gun control efforts are for a good cause, they would not have much of an impact on the gun violence rate (Goldberg 2). They’re wrong.On the 28th of April 1996, 28 year old Martin Bryant opened fire in Port Arthur, Tasmania in Australia. He killed thirty-five people and injured twenty-four. This was the worst massacre in Australian history. Twelve days later, the Australian government, led by Prime Minister John Howard, announced new gun policies for both state and local governments to enact. It started with a massive mandatory buyback of over 650,000 to one million semi-automatic shotguns and rifles (Mehta 2). The new gun laws also prohibited private sales and required that all weapons be registered individually …show more content…
“Self-defense” did not count as a genuine reason and polls showed that 90% of respondents were supportive of the new measures (Mehta 5). Although gun violence and deaths did not come to an end in Australia, as predicted, studies by Andrew Leigh of Australian National University and Christine Neill of Wilfrid Laurier University show that the homicide due to firearms rate when down 59% between 1995 and 2006 (Bowers 4). Suicides due to firearms dropped steeper at 65%. Robberies involving firearms decreased significantly and home invasions did not increase (Mehta . Contrary to the belief that firearms are needed to stop gun violence, the most stunning statistic from this is that in the decade before the Port Arthur massacre, eleven other mass shootings took place. After these new laws were implemented in Australia, there has not been a mass shooting defined as the gunman killing five or more people beside himself there since (Bowers 5). The United States government has debated this every time after a mass shooting. Those for gun control always mention Australia’s approach, but those who are against say it wouldn’t work. Cities in Florida, Connecticut, California, and Arkansas have all experimented with a buyback, but usually, the illegal guns or firearms which were confiscated by the police are just sold

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    After the massacre at Port Arthur the Australian government proposed tight new gun laws. This proposal included a ban on all…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    American radio host and political commentator, Tammy Bruce, in her article, Why Gun Control Wont End Mass Murder, describes many statistics of gun violence. Bruce’s purpose is to make her readers aware of gun violence and the many factors contributing to it as well as how it is statistically unlikely that gun control will help. She adopts an aggressive tone in order to support those that agree with her. The main ideas expressed throughout this article are that politicians use shootings and gun violence for political gain and aren’t doing anything to stop it. She explains that gun control wont stop gun violence because of problems such as drugs leading to terrorists. Tammy Bruce in her article uses many statistics and viewpoints to support her claim against gun control.…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Port Arthur Massacre

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The national firearm agreement was effective as it has met the needs of the wider Australian community by ensuring uniformity and harmonization on gun control laws. 
The ‘Australia’s New Gun Control Philosophy’ thought this law to be effective as it has taken a public health approach rather than a criminal justice…

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why do most of 19 different major varieties of gun control laws appear to have no impact, with a few exceptions, on the types of violence which frequently involve guns? Many explanations are suggested by both our own results and those of prior research. First, some gun laws are intended to have their effects by reducing gun ownership levels, so some gun laws may fail because they do not achieve their proximate goal of reducing gun ownership (Table IVA). However, our results also generally indicate that gun prevalence levels do not have a net positive effect on violence rates (top row, Table IVB). Consequently, gun laws may fail simply because, even if they did reduce gun prevalence, this would not produce a reduction in violence rates.…

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Firearm injuries are one of the top ten causes of death in the United States (“Statistics”). Firearms are the second leading cause of traumatic death related to consumer product in the U.S. and are the second most frequent cause of death overall for Americans ages 15 to 25 (Violence Policy Center para.4). Every two years more Americans die from firearm injuries than the total number of American soldiers killed during the eight year Vietnam War (Violence Prevention Institute). In 2005, 11,346 people were killed by firearm violence and 477,040 were victims of a crime involving a firearm. In 2006, firearms were used in 68 percent of murders, 42 percent of robbery offenses and 22 percent of aggravated assaults nationwide (National Institute of Justice). “Homicides committed with firearms peaked in 1993 at 17,075, after which the figure steadily fell, leveling off in 1999 at 10, 11. Gun-related homicides have increased each year since 2002”(National Institute of Justice). The federal government needs to take action to prevent similar tragedies from happening in the future. In an effort to stabilize and decrease firearm related injuries and deaths in the U.S. a strong federal law to control guns is…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Picture this scenario: an elementary class is enjoying recess out on the playground, and one child picks up a rock and throws it at a classmate.The teacher, instead of punishing the child, gives all other children a rock to defend themselves with, because the only thing that can stop a bad kid with a rock is a good kid with a rock, right?…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although guns provide a good way to protect us, they also offer an effective method to kill others. Perhaps many people may argue that gun is just one of the numerous tools killers use, they believe that gun control can’t eliminate murder. However, “The biggest problem with firearms is they kill quickly and they kill efficiently. The problem there is the instant impulse leads to death” (Schoener). Even though the government set up several restrictions for owning guns, killers can easily get them. What is worse, with the gun culture, people are more likely to release their anger by shooting. These entire make the gun law the most dangerous law we’ve ever…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gun Control Essay Example

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages

    What would be going through your mind if you were in a restaurant and a mad man came in and began slaughtering people right and left including you family (Swasey 174)? Would you be thinking if they would ban guns this would have never happened? Probably not! What you were probably thinking is if I had a gun on me I could protect not only my family but also the others being slaughtered. This same scenario was on the mind of Suzanna Gratia as written in Elizabeth Swasey essay ”NRA Woman’s Voice”(174). People are starting to see a gun as an object of death and destruction, and not what they are intended to be.…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    An argument used many times against gun is that bans on assault weapons and large magazines simply don't work 2). However for many countries around the world this statement is entirely false. In the United Kingdom, Japan, South Korea, and Australia, not only do all of these countries have strict gun laws but they also have the lowest death by gun rates, violent and accidental. In Australia during the 1980's the Prime Minister at the time initiated wide sweep of gun control. Since the 1970s Australia had had thirteen "mass shootings”; in the almost thirty years since the enactment of their gun control reform laws Australia has not had a single mass…

    • 951 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are several strategies that can dramatically reduce cases of gun violence. First, there are no reasons for citizens to purchase any type of semi-automatic or assault weapons. Instead, they should only be able to purchase handguns for protection purposes. Allowing citizens to purchase assault weapons only translates into providing support for people that have wrong intentions. Because these weapons are easily available, people who intend to cause harm can obtain one and carry out their plan. This is why it is very crucial to ban citizens from purchasing weapons that can inflict substantial damage. Although handguns can also cause great damage, they are less…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Pro Gun Control Essay

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Most people who own guns, are the legal owners of that weapon (“Kates”1). Other countries and some states in the United States that restrict gun laws have more murders than places that do not have gun laws (“Guns in”3). In the United Kingdom they banned handguns in 1997. Since then, the attack and crime rate went up 77%. This is equivalent to two attacks every two minutes. (“Guns in”3). This is further evidence that guns are not just for killing, guns are for…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay Against Gun Control

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As Barack Obama once said “My biggest frustration so far is the fact that this society has not been willing to take some basic steps to keep guns out of the hands of people who can do just unbelievable damage...This is becoming the normal.We should be ashamed ”(Obama). All around America many people are killed by gun violence.The issue of gun control has taken place in America for many years now.Now gun control has got out of hand.Due to the amount of gun violnece in the United States,the government has evrey right to dictate to citizens that they should not be allowed to own guns.…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gun Related Shootings

    • 1893 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Again, the media mantra is that less guns would make for less crime. However, as previously shown, the first issue with this is that criminals will always be able to attain a firearm through illegal means despite gun laws that are in place. Secondly, a study done in England and Wales tracked gun homicides before and after a handgun ban was put into effect at the beginning of 1997. The immediate effect was a 50% increase in gun homicides in the country, a number that only began to recede after the police force was nearly doubled. Despite even these efforts, the homicide rate never lowered back to a pre-ban state. Such outcomes were not unique to the UK, though. In Ireland, a gun ban immediately elicited a more than 500% spike in homicide rates, which have only proceeded to increase since, and in Jamaica, gun homicide rates had steadily risen to 600% their original rate from before the gun ban over a span of 32 years. Similar, albeit less severe, results occurred after gun bans in Chicago and Washington D.C. as well. Quite obviously, not only do severe gun restrictions not reduce gun violence, they have a negative effect on gun homicide rates. Furthermore, per the PoliceOne survey, found that police are generally skeptical about the positive impact gun control can achieve on gun violence. For example, 95% of officers did…

    • 1893 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Further evidence from Gun Violence and Gun Control states “On an annual basis, about 30,000 Americans are killed with guns each year, about 80,000 seriously injured…and an estimate in 2000 concluded that gun violence costs the nation a total of $100 billion annually in direct and indirect costs, including medical costs and lost productivity (805-806). The need for Americans to be able to protect themselves appears to be well documented. According LaPierre, Vice President of the NRA “Some 2.5 million times a year, according to well founded research, Americans defend themselves with firearms” (LaPierre 153). In contrast, Gun Violence and Gun Control states that “most analysts believe guns are used in legitimate self defense situations approximately 100,000 times per year” (806). The difference in figures and opinions reflects the vastness in the differing opinions as well as how high their emotions run. Nonetheless, there does appear to be a need for Americans to defend themselves and a need for regulation. The preceding statistics, along with examples of the obvious failure of banning firearms, and the number of firearms kept out of criminals hands due to the Brady Bill offers evidence for a need for a balance in…

    • 2849 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yet in the general population, and although the agenda-driven media hasn’t noticed, we can be grateful that gun violence has been trending downward since 1993 when it hit its last peak. Don’t want to credit a rise in gun ownership and concealed carry by law-abiding citizens for this good news? Fine. But then, don’t imagine that gun legislation is the reason or answer either. Leave that illusion to gun-control cheerleaders in the media. “Disarming Realities: Gun Sales Soar, Gun Crimes Plummet” in Forbes Magazine…

    • 1310 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays