Preview

Gun Control Rhetorical Analysis

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
563 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Gun Control Rhetorical Analysis
Ryann Miller
September 9, 2013
Grand Canyon University: ENG105
Ms. Sandi Greene

Ryann Miller
ENG105
September 6, 2013
Ms. Sandi Greene

Rhetorical Analysis- Gun Control- Rough Draft Gun Control laws have been discussed more and more now due to more recent tragedies because of gun violence. James Q. Wilson, previous a professor of Pepperdine University, UCLA, and an author of many public policy books, wrote and editorial letter trying to convince his intended audience that if the government passes more gun control laws it will not decrease the gun violence in America as much as society wants to believe it will. The LA Times published this editorial in 2007 and it is still a good resource. Wilson begins his editorial

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Okafor persuades the audience on why carrying a concealed gun on campus is a positive thing in this article. She starts with ethos by telling her own personal story of being assaulted as a child. This stimulates emotion and helps the audience learn about her credibility. Pathos is then used when she explains how a gun makes her feel “empowered”. This word has a positive connotation to it to evoke emotion in the audience. Additionally, logos is used when bringing up the facts about gun laws and assaults. She notes, “... one in five women are assaulted during college”. This statistic is easy to understand and gives shock appeal.…

    • 200 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    According to the article, “Leaders: America and Guns,” it is evident that gun control has proven ineffective when it comes to dissolving the “love affair” that exists between Americans and their guns (“Leaders: America and Guns”). This article highlights the issues that permeate throughout America regarding pro gun groups. Not only is this article persuasive, it infuses a degree of rhetorical strategies including logical, as well as emotional appeals to fortify the issue at hand. Various examples, statistics, and sound evidence is brought to the table, adequately arguing and developing the position that, “Americans want to keep their guns, no matter how high the price,” (“Leaders: America and Guns”). Furthermore, the other article, “Support for Gun Control Legislation,”…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ralph Nader is one of America's most renowned and effective campaigner for the rights of consumers and general public, a role that has repeatedly brought him into conflict with both businesses and the government.…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun Control Gun control has been a major issue in the past few years, and many journalists have written columns and essays in newspapers that are expressing their opinions on the subject. Nicholas Kristof, whom has been writing for newspapers for over ten years, took it upon himself to write Our Blind Spot about Guns for the New York Times in 2014. In his essay, Nicholas argued that if we set laws and regulations on guns the same way that we have done to cars, the amount of deaths caused by guns would decrease dramatically. He uses various statistics and discusses multiple ways that regulations and laws have decreased the amount of deaths caused by cars, and he relates it back to guns in his very well written essay. Nicholas seems to be addressing politicians in his essay, but his overall audience are those who are reading the newspaper.…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    James Q. Wilson writes in " Gun Control Isn't the Answer" about Americans having the right to own guns freely. He states that the rates of death will continue to rise even if there are gun laws. Gun control laws are laws that manage the sales, transfers, and possessions of firearms. In today's society the possessions of guns have skyrocketed through the roof, which is a great reason to have these laws. Contrary to what the author states, gun control is needed because our children are unsafe, homicide rates are rising, and the wrong people have guns.…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When president Roosevelt was elected the federal firearms act of 1938 put restriction on guns and ammunition trade, which results in dealers being registered to keep their records. President LBJ introduced a gun reform law that made stricter licensing and registration. He banned the sale of guns to felons and those who are mentally incompetent. The law also had regulations against destructive devices. Both of the laws from each president attempt to control gun laws were a pro. But today, even with those laws passed the world still suffers from someone hands behind a gun is a con. All three articles talks about controlling guns with laws. The pro with making laws against gun control is that the limit of power someone can have to a gun and its decrease violence that involves firearms. The con about that no matter how many laws are enforced people are still going to find a way to their rights to bear arm whether they are using it for the right or wrong reason. Some ideas that could help contribute to the gun laws is more security. When there is public places security and metal detectors should increase since we cannot make people get rid of guns we can be aware of who are carrying…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Guns need to be controlled. From the mass shooting in Newton, Connecticut that killed twenty-seven people, twenty of whom were faultless children at Sandy Hook Elementary, to nine people gunned down during Bible study in Charleston, South Carolina at Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal Church, guns have proven to be an extreme political problem. In 2011, former Arizona congresswoman, Gabrielle Giffords became a victim of gun violence, along with eighteen other guiltless people. She was shot (at point blank range) blankly in the head while campaigning outside of a Safeway franchise in suburban Tucson, Arizona. Lucky enough to have a second chance at life, Giffords found the motivation to tackle the law of…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The role guns play in our society has long been a controversial topic for the past few years in the united states. There are those who believe that guns do not belong in the hands of citizens and there are those who believe that guns are the foundation that protects our rights and liberties stated in the Constitution. There are too many leading factors as to why there should not be any stricter gun control laws. Some of these factors are that they go against our fundamental rights of self defense, give too much power to the government, and could potentially increase crime rates in the united states.…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun control advocates focus on the serious negative effects on gun availability on safety, while gun ownership advocates emphasize the lawful use of guns and their place in our history and culture. While our history and culture is important we need to address the current national problem in order to live in a safe enough society. In an effort to stabilize and decrease firearm related injuries and deaths in the U.S. a strong federal law to control guns is needed. In the bigger picture, we people will see the United States, as a Nation, as a better safer place to live in and not to die…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First of all more gun control laws would reduce gun deaths.Gun control laws don't deter crimes, gun ownership deters crime. In the twentieth-century weapon, ownership had doubled but the murder rate has decreased. Anyone can go buy a gun but that doesn't mean they're going to use…

    • 234 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The debate over the restrictions of gun control is centered on the Second Amendment to the Constitution, which gives people the right to bear arms. Gun control supporters believe that this explicit right does not extend to ownership of military-style firearms. For example, groups like the National Rifle Association argue that gun control infringes on the constitutional rights of law-abiding citizens. Gun control is an on-going debate because each year more people are killed by the use of guns. However, guns are not the result in the number of homicides each year, the problems rests with the irresponsible gun users. Gun Control would do nothing but harm America because guns offer protection and security…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    A) New Jersey Governor Chris Christie says” he believes the government has the right to “demand more” from law-abiding citizens, but acknowledges it can’t do the same to criminals.”…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gun Control Outline

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Thesis Statement – There is no doubt that this world would be a safer place without a license to carry, but we need to consider that guns are needed to hunt.…

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since the founding of our country, millions of lives have been taken due to lack of gun regulation. In the past year alone, there have been more mass shootings than there have been days in the year. These acts of terror have resulted in 12,703 deaths, 3,385 of which have been children and teenagers aged 0-17. The topic of gun regulation has become more and more heated over the past few years due to the increasing amount of controversial cases involving weapons (i.e. police brutality cases and racial discrimination incidents). Due to the rise in gun-related deaths, the United States Federal Government continues to argue over the way to reduce the number of innocent lives lost. Republicans argue that mental health should be a greater focus than…

    • 221 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The argument on firearm regulation has been a heated discussion for many years. On one side of the debate, we have people in favor placing restrictions on guns, while, on the opposite end of the spectrum, we have people fighting the regulation of guns. People in favor gun restrictions believe gun control can reduce crime ,while, the people against gun control believe having the right to bear arms is an effective crime deterrent. I believe that every law abiding citizen should be able to carry a gun and defend themselves against people who intend to harm them.Gun control laws are simply ineffective and they have an adverse effect on crime. Instead of reducing crime, gun control laws just simply take guns out the hands of good people and puts the guns into the hands of the bad guys.…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays