The rate of loss is instead accelerating.” Right now the earth has about 15% of Earths land and 2.8% of the Earths oceans as reserved purely for biodiversity, Wilson wants to bring that to 50%. While he is realistic in understanding that no one will just automatically give up ownership of their own land, believing that 50% of earth can “be allowed to exist unharmed (pg 189)" is a bit unrealistic. With the growing population, how are we suppose to find space for everyone if we cut down the amount of space available for human use. He writes “the key to saving one-half of the planet is the ecological footprint, defined as the amount of space required to meet all of the needs of an average person (pg 189), but he doesn’t really detail as to how we can lessen the ecological footprint of a person. Take half the earth and set it aside for the wilderness, easy to say, but half the earth includes 195 countries. How would we get 195 countries to be on board with this plan when, the one of the most powerful nations in the country, the US, is opposed to even the Paris agreement, I guess you could say is a milder version of a solution to environment sustainability when compared to a solution like the one offered in this
The rate of loss is instead accelerating.” Right now the earth has about 15% of Earths land and 2.8% of the Earths oceans as reserved purely for biodiversity, Wilson wants to bring that to 50%. While he is realistic in understanding that no one will just automatically give up ownership of their own land, believing that 50% of earth can “be allowed to exist unharmed (pg 189)" is a bit unrealistic. With the growing population, how are we suppose to find space for everyone if we cut down the amount of space available for human use. He writes “the key to saving one-half of the planet is the ecological footprint, defined as the amount of space required to meet all of the needs of an average person (pg 189), but he doesn’t really detail as to how we can lessen the ecological footprint of a person. Take half the earth and set it aside for the wilderness, easy to say, but half the earth includes 195 countries. How would we get 195 countries to be on board with this plan when, the one of the most powerful nations in the country, the US, is opposed to even the Paris agreement, I guess you could say is a milder version of a solution to environment sustainability when compared to a solution like the one offered in this