Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Han Dynasty vs Rome Empire

Good Essays
706 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Han Dynasty vs Rome Empire
The dawn of a new era in history was marked by the creation of empires. Their impact on the world has not left civilizations today, considering how all modern empires are modeled and compared to the first ones: Rome and Han. Both of these empires were the culmination of the ideas brought forth in the previous era, and had many similarities in their approach to key concepts. However, they also had several key differences in how they managed certain situations. During the classical time period, the Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty adapted to a changing era by both becoming world powers through expansion and structure, but they were different in how they approached government, handled economical matters, and the types of technology used.
Both the Roman Empire and Han Dynasty had muli-layered government systems, but differed in their approach to controlling their territories. Both empires encouraged expansion into new areas, believing in the need for “buffer zones” to protect themselves from invasion and also to gather more resources. However, the empires needed methods to control these new territories. The Roman Empire encouraged a more free system, allowing the local elite to rule and expecting only labor and resources from them. They believed in allowing other cultures to co-exist with Roman beliefs, and upholding their common law system in all regions of the empire. The Han Dynasty, however, had a more strict approach, placing their own people into new areas. These people, usually middle class, would create a bureaucracy in the territory, and create a sense of unification by requiring Mandarin and Confucianism. The Hans wanted a central system of Confucianism placed in every corner of their empire. Overall, the two empires were able to create a stable government that was effective in all of its departments. The two empires were also able to create a stable economy that was, for the most part, able to sustain itself. Both had an agricultural-based economy that was driven by the amount of land owned, since the government would receive payment from the harvest. There was a split in philosophy between the two, however, on how much land was needed. The Han Dynasty were able to sustain themselves after conquering some land, using their own peasants as a labor force. On the other side, the Roman Empire had to continuously expand in order to replenish both resources and their slave force. However, both were able to tax their territories to fund their projects and military. Once again, there were differences. The Romans used merchants to monitor taxes, and they had the pax romana policy, where all merchants were protected from harm. The Hans also used merchants, but they were not trusted in society. In conclusion, the empires had new ideas in creating their economy.
The empires also had several other new ideas in the field of technology. One new concept both sides presented is a complex road system to connect the empire, allowing for more communication and commerce. Each empire had their own accomplishments to boot as well. The Romans were able to create aqueducts, concrete, and arches to create the roads along with a piping system to transport water. The Hans were able to develop the science of astronomy, along with the physical objects of watermills, horse collars, paper, and seismometers. Both empires also created new ideologies as well. The Romans were a part of the eruption of Christianity, while the Han embraced the new Buddhism. Both empires were able to create new ideas that helped their regions flourish.
Both the Roman Empire and Han Dynasty were able to accomplish many wonderful things in their times, and left a large impact upon the world today. They both were able to exist with a functional government, a flourishing economy, and innovative ideas. However, they did have differences, particularly in how to rule over new territories, what to use as a labor force, and different ideologies. These concepts behind an empire can be applied to modern empires, mainly the United States. The comparisons can be due to the similarities in government and ideology, but also differences in how the economy and technology is handled. The Roman Empire and Han Dynasty were able to personify a new era in human civilization.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Both Han China and Imperial Rome used a centralized government with roads to help them rule their large empire, yet Han China had Confucianism to legitimize their rule while Roman emperors were dependent on the support of a large military force for legitimacy from 204 B.C.E to 476 C.E.…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Roman Empire and Han Dynasty were different politically. The Roman Empire was founded on imported agriculture and didn’t have a set bureaucracy. While the emperor of Rome appointed some advisors the government lacked many institutions, such as a planned budget. Apart from the emperor and senate the Romans didn’t have other levels of government; because of this the farther reaches of the Roman Empire had more autonomy. The Han was founded on strict legalism and had a well organized bureaucracy. Even though the emperor had absolute power, institutions such as the Three Councilors of State and Nine…

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In late B.C.E and early C.E many empires rose and thrived. While these empires all desired to conquer and become the strongest, they had other things in common. In Han China, a long lasting empire from 206 B.C.E to 220 C.E, the leadership was similar to the leadership of Imperial Rome, an empire from 31 B.C.E to 476 C.E. Both empires were lead by an emperor, who was the sole lawmaker for the empire, the over thrower of the previous leader and impact on many other aspects of the region. However, these two empires differed in their religious ways. In the Roman Empire, the government had a state sponsored religion and emperors participated in the organization of it. Contrary to Imperial Rome, Han China’s emperors were much less concerned with religion; instead they followed the Confucian ideology in their government. These two…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When Han China and Imperial Rome are compared, one can find both similarities and differences in terms of techniques of imperial administration. A similarity would be that both are bureaucracies. However, both are also different. One major difference is that Han China had the civil service exams. They also differed because Han China had a much greater emphasis on religion than the Romans. These differences led to very different futures for the two empires, both of which were among the strongest in the world at the time.…

    • 568 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One major similarity between the administration policies of Han China and Imperial Rome was that both empires had very centralized governments. In China, the emperor had all the power. While there were smaller units of government, the emperor controlled everything within the empire. Han China’s government structure was modeled after its precursor, the Qin dynasty. The Han elaborated on the original structure, perfecting it. In Rome, the emperor was also the most powerful; however the Roman people had an illusion of power not seen in Han China. Although the emperor held the…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imperial Rome and Han China are both well recognized empires, known as strong and fairly successful. Although the empires had some differences they also had similarities in their methods of political control. Similarities between these empires include the belief that leaders had connections to God, religious tolerance, and public works provided to citizens. Along with the similarities in political control the differences include Rome having a democracy while China had a centralized bureaucracy, Rome had lesser domestic repercussions while China had harsh punishments, and Rome offered assimilation to become a citizen while China did not need to offer assimilation because it conquered states that were already chinese.…

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire were very common in the aspect of their downfall and collapse. Han China had a well-organized bureaucracy based upon Confucian ideas and education. In addition, they also had emphasis on family ancestors (patriarchal), reliance on landed gentry, and accomplishments in engineering; which includes roads, canals, and the Great Wall. The Roman Empire contained a well-organized bureaucracy as well which was founded on Roman law and classical learning. They also implied emphasis on family (pater familias), had reliance on patricians, and had engineering accomplishments; including roads, aqueducts, amphitheaters, domes, sewage systems, and central heating. Although, unfortunately the two become even more common…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Han and the Romans both had very passive views when it came to technology, both sharing the "good is good enough" mindset. This appears through people of high class wanting higher quality materials and laborers, the Han enjoying a superb invention but not outwardly seeking to improve it, as well as the Romans appreciated fantastic inventions without searching for ways to improve…

    • 64 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bureaucracy was founded on roman law and classical learning local officials. The Roman Army was considered the best trained and best fed, and Augustus was their set model for emperor established principate. Their laws were established by the “Twelve Tables” and they believed in citizenship. The Rome empire government believed in slave labor, while Han China’s emperor was considered the “son of heaven”. Their bureaucracy was founded on Confucian ideas and traditions used by local officials. The Han China Emperor proclaimed laws, as well as military and civilian conscription, and they used confucian scholars as government officials. The Han China empire had no idea of what citizenship was, and their laws were proclaimed by their emperor. While there were quite a few differences between the empires when it came to their government systems, the similarities included both having extensive road systems for the military which doubled as the spread of commerce and culture, due to enemies on their borders, while also emphasizing territorial…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the classical period, many civilizations, and empires have grown, like Greece, the Mayan empire, and the Gupta Empire. Although many have rose, and became greater, a few empires also got destroyed, including some of the same that grew. Near the end of the classical period, two of the largest empires of Ancient Europe and Asia, Rome and Han China collapsed. Even though the Han China Empire only lasted 200 years, and Rome around 900, they were the largest empires in the classical period. Each empire had many different emperors, and rulers, yet they continued to fail in restoring the empires. During the Classical era, the Roman Empire and Han China both had problems with epidemics, and corrupt leaders; However, they also divided they're kingdoms differently, and fell from different conflicts.…

    • 835 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Han and Imperial Rome both exercised political control through similar government structures and social hierarchies. There were many elites who supported Han China’s emperor, Wu di and the “mandate of Heaven.” In Han, their government hierarchies were based on confusium. The followers of this included many bureaucrats, common people, and peasants. Imperial rome had a had a very similar way of ranking these people. Rome had a main leader. Emperor Augustus Ceasar. The top class in Rome was then bureaucrats and politicians, much like Han China. Below them came merchants, common people, and peasants. Then even below them came Slaves used for labor, but this was only used in Imperial Rome. This ranking system was a major similarity between these two civilizations political structure, and structure both civilizations greatly.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rome and Han China were classical civilizations that built centralized empires, which eventually expanded. Both Rome and Han experienced unequal land distribution which led to political instability, and both suffered from invasions of nomadic tribes due to political instability which would lead to the collapse. However, only the western portion of the Roman Empire collapsed whereas the entire Han met its demise.…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The religion in Rome was much more thorough than the Han religion. Roman rulers organized the state religion while the Han emperors were more earthly. The Han emperors acknowledged the existence of the gods and participated in ceremonies, but didn’t really have much concern for them. Both Empires focused on rituals that would bring loyalty to the empire, but neither of them were extremely spiritual. The Han Empire used Confucian thought as their primary ideology.…

    • 75 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    No matter where an empire is located, maintaining a vast empire always comes with many hardships, and the Roman and Chinese Empires were no exception. In the time of city-states, the Romans had developed a Republican form of government, which successfully met its needs. However, the Romans failed to develop a new form of government that catered to the demands of an expanding empire, resulting in the fall of the Republic, and Roman emperors were never able to develop an effective ideology of rule. Coupled with armies' loyalties to generals rather than the state, the empire was prone to bloody civil wars and frequent change in rulers who only reigned for several months or years. Also, the empire's obsession with expanding and protecting its borders also led to an increased demand for military service, after which many small farmers had no work, leading to growing populations stuck in poverty and prone to riots. Furthermore, these small farms, which used to produce grain, were replaced, and the empire had to rely on imported grain for sustenance. These events led to the third century crisis, in which the Roman Empire faced a period in which political, military, and economic problems nearly destroyed the empire. China, despite being located in a different hemisphere, faced incredibly similar problems. Both the Roman and Chinese Empires had significant political and social turmoil due to conflicts between independent regions over power. Because it was impossible to communicate any faster than the speed of a horse, empires relied on autonomous local leaders to maintain control. However, many local leaders and military generals being more interested in their own political power, which led to internal conflicts and civil wars. The expanding borders also required greater protection, and both of the administrative centers of these empires were located far from its long borders. In order to maintain and protect its borders, the…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Two of the most significant empires of the classical period were the Rome empire and the Han dynasty. Both of these nations developed a well built Bureaucracy, emphasis on family, and boasted the invention of many technological advances. These two powerhouses still affect our everyday lives. However, all good things must come to an end.…

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics