Preview

Hannah Arendt's Totalitarian Government

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
800 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Hannah Arendt's Totalitarian Government
Totalitarian Governments
(Arendt Views) What is a totalitarian government? Totalitarianism is a political system where the state recognizes no limits to it’s authority and strives to regulate every aspect of public and private live wherever feasible. Totalitarian government is run by a sort of dictator that has immense power over the state and the people who are under him. “A totalitarian society is usually ruled by a dictator, and there is very little or no freedom. In totalitarianism, the government controls almost every aspect of life.” (Wintrobe) Totalitarian government is the strictest most dictated form of government there is. We often identify totalitarian government with communism. Communism has been a topic of issue in the U.S. for quite some time now. Hannah Arendt experienced a totalitarian government first hand when she was
…show more content…
She comments on the “principle of action,” as the twin criteria of organization. She also comments on the difference between “lawful” and “lawless.” “Arendt argues that Western political thought has customarily distinguished between ‘lawful’ and ‘lawless’, or ‘constitutional’ and ‘tyrannical’ forms of government” (Dietz) Arendt reveals that terror is at the core of a totalitarian government and that terror is based on ideology. Arendt uses two types of governments to prove a point; fascist Germany and communist Russia. These governments are very controlling and difficult to live in, like totalitarian governments. She clears up the fact that totalitarian governments are not run by tyranny. She explains that even though it seems as if tyranny could be the only way a government would be run like that, that it wasn’t. Having first hand experiences with a type of totalitarian government makes her arguments very

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Geography 12b Notes

    • 26113 Words
    • 105 Pages

    Totalitarianism- Most extreme form of dictatorship. Government tries to control every part of society- politics, the…

    • 26113 Words
    • 105 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Totalitarianism may be defined as a ‘system of highly centralized government in which one political party or group takes control and grants neither recognition nor tolerance to other political groups.’ [1] A totalitarian system of governance rules in a autocratic and dictatorial manner and uses weapons of suppression, fear, intolerance, oppression, and terror to ensure its continuity; not to mention its most important tool: propaganda.…

    • 1590 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    1. At one extreme is a society governed by a totalitarian regime. In such a political system, a small group of leaders or a single individual- a dictator- makes all political decisions for the society. Every aspect of political, social, and economic life is controlled by the government. The power of the ruler is total (thus, the term totalitarian).…

    • 4516 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this book, Hannah Arendt goes over the principles of the politics of communist and autocrat governments. She believes that these types of governments use tools such as implantation, or brainwashing, to get the people to believe a certain sets of ideas. These governments would get the people to believe that one race was better than the others by using those brainwashing methods. This is how Arendt thought these totalitarian governments got all of their power, and once they had that power, anything done wrong against a certain race of people would be accepted, and in some cases advocated. Such was the case in Nazi Germany in its prosecution against the Jews.…

    • 255 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Margaret Canovan argued that Hannah Arendt failed to realize that political opinions too have drawbacks. According to Arendt, different people have different opinions and claims that one political opinion can bring an enhancement on another. Based on this assumption, she adopted Kant’s notion of “judgement,” that is, “to think for the sake of general” into her political thinking. But Habermas rejected her ideas on the ground that it is “monologic.” She seems to have left no room for “rational truth” in political affairs. On the other hand, Canovan also disputed on Habermas’s insistence for fixing his attention on rational consensus. Habermas assumes that “just” society can be institutionalized if political discourse is based on ideal discourse. On this ground, Arendt also argued that Habermas’ idea of placing politics on rational consensus might lead him into a dangerous illusion. Canovan’s concern on the distinctive views of rational communication between Arendt and Habermas however leave a sarcastic remark on the latter because according to her Habermas might have to wait his whole life in…

    • 374 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In a totalitarian rule, Arendt proceeds by not viewing genocide as a condition. However, what she does argue is that totalitarian does not only try to eliminate physical life but rather “total terror.” Total terror can be defined as abolishing certain rights, property, and the deportation and murder of an entire race or community. In…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What is totalitarianism? Totalitarianism is a form of government in which the government completely reminisced one’s individuality and freedom. In Aldous Huxley’s novel, “Brave New World,” totalitarianism is perfectly demonstrated in which humans are scientifically made and have no control over their desired purpose on earth. Totalitarianism is also seen in George Orwell’s novel, “1984,” where the government has eyes on everything. This means there is no privacy what so ever. The uncontrolled power of the state will destroy a community and lead to total disaster.…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hannah Arendt is the author of “total domination” that is one part of last chapter in the Origins of Totalitarianism. In Arendt’s essay “Total Domination”, she uses thesis to support her opinion that totalitarianism is a scary system and totalitarian leadership should never be used. However, in some facts, I disagree with Arendt’s statement that she mentions in essay.…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1984

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Totalitarianism is a political system with absolute and total rule over its people. The state has no limits to its authority and tries to regulate every aspect of public and private life. This is most evident when Orwell writes, “it was conceivable that they watched everybody all the time.” The danger of this form of government is that your life ceases to be your own.…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Guns

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Totalitarian system- most people are excluded from making the rules by which they live. Political control is held by one person, a small group of people, or one political party.…

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1984 Totalitarianism

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Governments are the powerhouse of a country. However, when they contain too much power, they not only run the country, but the lives of every citizen. In other words, governments like those are considered totalitarian, They control all parts of society, including the daily life of their inhabitants. Total submissiveness is required, and opposition is punished severely. In 1984 by George Orwell, the reader can infer that the government is totalitarian based on their ideals and values. Especially in aspects surrounding society and everyday life, Big Brother’s party is evidently a totalitarian regime.…

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is an idea that totalitarian governments are bad and should be removed everywhere and replace it with totalitarianism. “The contention of this book is thus that the notion of totalitarianism, far from being an effective theoretical concept, is kind of a stopgap: instead of enabling us to think, forcing us to acquire a new insight into the historical reality it describes, it relieves us of the duty to think, or even actively prevents us from thinking.” (Zizek) Our government in the US makes our decisions basically, however we still get the freedom to do what we please for the most part. The difference in a totalitarian government is the fact that they are usually ruled by a dictator and what freedoms does that give a person? They do not get to think on their own like Zizek said, they might even be prevented from thinking on their…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Arendt posited that the totalitarian forms of “government and domination” (Arendt. 303) which characterised the Nationalist Socialist party in Germany and Stalin’s oppressive regime in Soviet Russia, which saw systematic genocide and terror visited upon literally millions of innocent people, were unprecedented in the history of political systems, and were not mere modern manifestations of ancient forms of violent government such as despotism or tyranny. She went further even, to suggest that totalitarian systems had destroyed the very foundations upon which traditional ideas and presuppositions of government rested. Although totalitarianism seemed to contain elements of tyrannical or despotic…

    • 2292 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    When Hannah Arendt completed her work The Origins of Totalitarianism, she essentially took a historical approach for her analysis. The stories of Nazism and Stalinism exhibited the power of reorienting the mass for political purpose. However, her work foreshadowed what happened 15 years later in China -- The Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution. The key elements reappeared and constituted another experiment of pushing the regime to be totalitarian. I argue that the influence of mass and the strategy of manipulating the mass are indeed inseparable from the construction of totalitarianism. The only puzzle is, nevertheless, if there is any relationship between a political religion, and totalitarianism.…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Totalitarianism Essay

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The first type of totalitarianism that Taylor identified is “Orwelian” named so because George Orwell’s Oceania state fits into this. Under this type, individuals have no intrinsic value but instead serve the interests of the state. Only the well-being of the state has any importance under this system, the individual serves to increase this well-being which is measured in terms of prestige and power. This is where Nazi Germany places and incidentally also what Popper was talking about when he called Plato a totalitarian. The second type he calls “organic” totalitarianism. The aim of the state is still the same but the role of the individual is slightly different. In this case “the good of the individual is identified as his/her contribution to the state” meaning that the individual has some intrinsic value unlike under “Orwelian” totalitarianism. It’s important to note however that the individual still serves the state as this is the “ultimate good.” The final kind, according to Taylor, is “paternalistic” totalitarianism. There is a change from the other two in this type because the state is there to provide it’s citizens with everything necessary to improve their individual well-being, similar to a democracy but totalitarian rule is…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays