In the article, “Undercover Parents,” the author, Harlan Coben claims that parents should spy on their kids to monitor their internet use. He states that anything less than spying “borders on negligence.” Coben uses anecdotes to support his claims. His evidence is weak and his anecdotes are unbelievable at best. He poses several arguments and proceeds to refute them in his same idealistic manner. Coben’s idea of parenting and his claim are both idealistic and paranoid.…
In Harlan Coben’s article, “The Undercover Parent”(March 6,2008) he talks about the dangers on the internet and how we can prevent our children from the dangers by using spyware. I agree him about spyware. I think it can stop many things from happening.…
In the article “The Undercover Parent,” (2008) written by Harlan Coben, he is in support of parents using spyware on their children. Personally, I have to agree with the author because parents could keep their children a lot safer from the dangers of the internet by using spyware. I believe parents should use spyware, but only for safety reasons and not just for the sake of spying. The author gives an example of the dangers of being on the internet like the young boy that didn’t know he was talking to a pedophile or the girl committing suicide because of being cyberbullied. The author also states that parents shouldn’t overuse the spyware to the point where they read every word they tell their friends and know everything about what their friends…
If I put spyware on my teens electronics, I would tell them. Coben says… “Do you tell your children that the spyware is on the computer? I side with yes,” (Paragraph 15) One thing would be good about this is your being truthful to your teens and if they’d know, they would be more aware of how easily your parents could monitor you, but predators as well.…
Harlen Coben, in an essay in The New York Times, “The Undercover Parent” (March 16, 2008) asserts that parents should install spyware on their children’s computers in order to protect children from the dangers of the internet. Coben claims that because what a child does on the internet is public, as a parent you have the right to view it as well, so we should be monitoring them in this area as well. However, Coben does admit that this is indeed an invasion of privacy, but that in order to be a good parent we must do so to protect our children from pedophiles and bullies that lure on the internet. Coben attempts to educate parents about the dangers the internet poses to children, and how spyware can be an effective solution to our need to protect our kids.…
Nathan Boyd Chapter 5 1. Since most people care about their children, they will often over exaggerate or repress the truth to their kids about a certain threat to protect their children. 2. When a parent does not know how to deal with a child because the parent is still young and does not know what to do, they will often rely on an expert or a wiser person’s opinion to help them deal with certain issues. With all of the risks and dangers of not taking care or treating a baby correctly, many parents are afraid and the parent book market exploits this fear to make money on it.…
In his article “The Undercover Parent,” Harlan Coben discusses this topic on The New York Times magazine. At first, Harlan couldn’t accept it either; he thinks parents are wrong to pry into children’s privacy world. However, he found out that there is no mistake for parents to download any software in their own computers, and there is nothing wrong for parents to protect their kids. Harlan Coben said use spyware to surveillance kids’ private world is “Scary. But a good idea. Most parents won’t even consider it.” Because they think if children are old enough to go on the Internet, they will old enough to know the dangers; they think using parental blocks is enough; however, parental blocks didn’t work sometimes. So it is hard for parents to just simply trust…
Coben, even though he is very reasonable, is encouraging the invasion your child's privacy, for example ¨ posting thoughts on the internet isn't the same thing as hiding them under your mattress. Maybe you should buy your child one of those key locked diaries....¨ you never know, maybe your child has a private account that only him or herself can read just to jot down thoughts and/or personal things, it isn't always the situation where your child is a bad person and posts malapropos or malicious pictures or thoughts/ideas where everyone can see. Coben also doesn't take into consideration what teens may think of this ¨spyware¨ maybe your child is very trustworthy and their parent reads Cobens essay and after profoundly thinking about it, decides to put an app or parental locks on their child's computer that sends reports and/or checkups on teens to parents, that is gonna make your teen wanna hide things from…
In the article “The Undercover Parent”, Coben explains why parents should monitor their kids to keep them safe. Coben’s arguments are very detailed, he lists the reasons why parents should or should not monitor their kids. I believe that Coben’s argument about monitoring their kids is right.…
The parent and child relationship on this matter should just include trust. Using spyware on children’s devices without consent breaks the bond of trust between the parent and the child. If a child and the parent have trust in each other and don’t lie to one another, spyware is not needed. However, if the child constantly lies and breaks trust it can be seen why some parents see monitoring as an option for watching their kid online. “The ability to experience privacy is probably a basic human need that transcends culture,” says Skyler Hawk, a social psychologist who studies adolescent development at the Chinese University of Hong Kong.…
Harlen Coben in editorial “The Undercover Parent” ( March 16,2008 ) claims that parents should have conversations about their concerns with their teenagers ,and let them know spyware is a possibility. The Author supports and develops the thesis by putting enough evidence to the article. He also supports the thesis by convincing people to use spyware is a possibility.…
“This legislation grew out of the fact that by 1998 roughly ten million American children had access to the Internet, and at the same time, studies indicated that children were unable to understand the potential effect of revealing their personal information online and parent failed to monitor their children’s use of the Internet.” (Koby)…
Spyware is a software program that collects personal information of the users without their formal consent. Unlike viruses and worms, spyware does not usually self replicate, or intrude into the system directly or spread from one system to another; instead, it intrudes into a system by deceiving the user or exploiting software vulnerabilities in a system. Once it gets into the system, its implications can range from disturbing to devastating. It propagates using personalization cookies, tracking cookies, Trojans, drive-by downloads, hacking and piggybacking.…
The 4th Amendment to the United States Constitution grants the right of privacy to all people in the country. The use of spyware on children and teens is blant attack on that amendment. Consequently, it has been a real controversial topic between parents and their kids ever since it was invented and used in the 1900’s. There have been many arguments and reasons that have been said for and against it. I for one am against its use. Among those who are for the use of spyware is an author named Harlan Coben, the author of The Undercover Parent. Throughout the article, he argues reasons that support his side. However, Coben’s arguments about the use of spyware because spyware restricts freedom, it’s an invasion of privacy and it doesn’t let children…
There are many ways to define what spyware is. According to Susannah Fox (2005, p.2), Associate Director of Pew Internet & American Life Project, spyware is “a software that is placed secretly on a computer in order to track a user’s behaviour and…