On the surface Kurtz’s last words, “The horror! The horror!” (Conrad, 69), can be accredited to Kurtz reliving his life before he dies. Some people use the saying ‘my life flashed before my eyes’ after being in a near death experience. Since Kurtz was dying, it is likely he saw a replay of his life. Why would Kurtz be horrified about that? According to his intended, “[H]is goodness shown in every act…” (Conrad, 76), so what did Kurtz have to worry about? Kurtz worried about the goodness of his actions. Could it be the goodness his intended had mentioned was shown in the International Society for the Suppression of Savage Customs where his eloquent words teemed with sympathy for the natives? However, Kurtz erased any goodness when he wrote “Exterminate all the brutes” (Conrad, 50) at the end. Therefore it can be assumed that whatever goodness Kurtz had before his job in Africa, it was gone now. In fact, as Kurtz saw his life go by him once more, what he saw horrified him.
Everybody in Heart of Darkness views the natives as savage, inferior creatures and they are perhaps demeaned the most by Kurtz. At the Outer and Central Station the blacks were physically beaten and starved. Marlow describes them as “[B]undles of acute angles” (Conrad, 17), and they looked like they were “in some picture of a massacre or a pestilence” (Conrad, 17). The Europeans did not care about the natives and acted accordingly. They physically brutalized the natives and were indifferent to whether or not the natives died. Kurtz was no different. He demeaned the natives just as much but in a different way.
Much like a cult, Kurtz gathered the natives, poisoning their minds. The Russian explains to Marlow that the natives had such a great reverence to Kurtz that “They would crawl…” (Conrad, 58) to him. Yes, like some worshipping rite, the natives demeaned themselves by approaching Kurtz on their hands and knees. It was not just the ‘common’ native people either, but the great chiefs as well. Kurtz was an idol to be praised, a leader to be obeyed, and a dictator to rule. He subdued his enemy, the ‘rebels,’ by sticking their heads outside his window. Marlow comments, “They would have been more impressive, those heads on the stakes, if their faces had not been turned to the house” (Conrad, 57). Why would Kurtz do that? The heads did not face the landscape warning people off, but towards the house so Kurtz could see the lifeless faces staring at him. It is possible that he did so to remind himself of the guilt of murdering people, but that is highly unlikely. No, instead of a reminder of guilt, those faces were a reminder of triumph. Kurtz had done it; he subdued the ‘rebels’ that kept him from getting ivory. Not only did he subdue the ‘rebels’, but he also captured the hearts of the other natives. They loved him so much that they attacked a steamer just so Kurtz would not leave. However, like a true cult, the natives were simply following Kurtz’s orders. It is learned from the Russian that “[I]t was Kurtz who ordered the attack to be made of the steamer” (Conrad, 63). Upon his actual departure the natives saw him off sorrowfully. The irony though is that Kurtz did not want to leave the Inner Station as well. Why did he not want to leave? Kurtz did not want to leave because darkness consumed him.
Darkness filled Kurtz’s soul to the point where Marlow comments, “[H]is soul was mad” (Conrad, 66). Silence and solitude caused Kurtz to become mad, though he had plenty of company. His native lover is described as “[S]avage and superb, wild-eyed and magnificent...” (Conrad, 60). Maybe that is the reason why he went mad. He had company to be sure, but savage company. He had no cultured or civilized people to discuss matters with or somebody who came from the same background to swap stories with. Kurtz was left utterly alone in his thoughts, which caused him to become filled with darkness. The darkness is in everyone; however, Kurtz lacked the restraint to keep it shackled inside of him.
It is possibly that lack of restraint that scared Kurtz the most as he watched his life go by him. He relived every moment as saw the man he had morphed into. Kurtz had become a man who killed unashamedly, threatened everyone, and whose only goal was to find ivory. As Marlow puts it “To speak plainly, he raided the country” (Conrad, 55). Ivory was his mistress, tempting and taunting him to continue in his dark path. All of the vile deeds, he did in the name of ivory. His lack of restraint destroyed him, and that is what he saw before he died a broken, despicable, and mad man.
Now that is what he saw as his life flashed before him, but some can say that what he saw was something much deeper. Kurtz was a sinner, an unrepentant sinner. Therefore it is not that much of a stretch to say Kurtz saw that he was going to hell. Hell is described by many as a fiery pit from which there is no escape. It is where a person will live in eternal torment for the deeds they committed on earth. Sister Faustina was a person who saw hell in a vision. She claims that “Each soul undergoes terrible and indescribable sufferings, related to the manner in which it has sinned” (Bibleprobe.com). Now Kurtz’s last words make a little more sense. His cry, “The horror! The horror!” (Conrad, 69), can be understood as him realizing his consequences for his actions. Due to his cruel and unjust treatment of the natives, and for allowing the darkness in his soul out his soul shall be in Hell for all eternity. It is in Hell where Kurtz receives the ultimate punishment, an eternity of suffering and despair.
To conclude, Joseph Conrad has Kurtz’s last words in Heart of Darkness be a declaration of the consequences of unleashing the darkness within. The evil that spread in Kurtz’s soul was all consuming. It was the perfect mixture of subtle and obvious. However, due to his lack of restraint, Kurtz died a troubled and condemned man. He may have seen his life flash before him, but he also viewed his punishment. Eternity in Hell is his punishment, for it is filled with unimaginable horror.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
OUTCOME 1: Understand the need for secure handling of information in health and social care settings…
- 1008 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
The climactic rise and fall of Kurtz and Nathan Price typifies the destructive, insidious force of society’s truth upon the human soul. Signs of Kurtz’ troubled state litter Marlow’s initial days at the Central Station. While admiring an agent’s artifact collection, Marlow stumbles upon a small sketch “representing a woman, draped and blind-folded, carrying a lighted torch” (Conrad 122). Kurtz’ revelatory painting of the “sinister” looking woman engulfed in darkness clearly reflects his struggle with forging ahead on the continuum of truth (Conrad 122). Unfortunately, the constant praise of his peers, who regarded Kurtz as a “remarkable person” (Conrad 115), “exceptional man,” (Conrad 119), “a prodigy” (Conrad 122), coupled with the unbounded freedom of the Congo, creates a severe superiority complex within him, grinding his continuum to a halt. Once on his knees, the European imperialist mentality effectively crushes Kurtz’ inner principles: “it had taken him, loved him, embraced him, got into his veins, consumed his flesh, and sealed his soul to its own” (Conrad 147). In Poisonwood Bible, Nathan Price also falls…
- 2281 Words
- 10 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Conrad finds the similarities between whites and savages, a kind of “kinship.” Further in the story savages are significantly degraded. The savages act more civilized than the pilgrims as their journey leads them to Kurtz’s…
- 365 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Even though Marlow’s unrealistic depiction of Kurtz has been shattered by Kurtz’s cruelty, he believes that Kurtz achieved a “moral victory” in the battle with death. In a contest “without clamour, without glory, without the great desire, without the great fear of desire,” Kurtz achieved what Marlow fears he may not be able to do: “He had something to say. He said it.” In his final moments, Kurtz realized the cruelty of his own actions and, in this realization, weakly speaks the words “The horror!” When Marlow came within “ a hair’s breath” of death, he faced the humiliation that he might have nothing to say; therefore, Kurtz’s final “pronouncement” is of so much value to Marlow that it keeps him “loyal to Kurtz to the last.” Marlow believes that life is a riddle which baffles all men and that death is an adversary that every men must wrestle with. Conrad’s use of metaphor to depict Kurtz’s final struggle with life highlights the importance of Kurtz’s “moral victory” to Marlow. The notion of defeat or victory in the “unexciting contest” of life emphasizes that Marlow admires the strength Kurtz shows in his final…
- 375 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Even though The Heart Of Darkness has two different views about the fate of imperialism the pessimistic view and the optimistic view, both views closely relate to the views depicted in Apocalypse Now Redux. “But at first glance you could see there a singleness of intention, an honest concern for the right way of doing work which made these humble pages thought out so many years ago luminous with another than a professional light.” All throughout the book and the movie the depiction of Kurtz is realized to be frightening…
- 411 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
However, the evil of some people might not be evident until drawn out from societal values and motives. The darkness of men consumes their mind and is able to control them in inexplainable ways. Marlow draws that Europe’s presence in Africa spread new evils that spread throughout the natives, through Kurtz, and through himself. Darkness is everywhere and can be present in many different ways. Kurtz struggled with the desire for greed and power, which led him to his own fall. Marlow discovered his own corruption and moral depravity, but was able to control it. Although darkness is universal among men, its temptations can still be…
- 765 Words
- 4 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Was it Kurtz who did the killing/slaughtering? Or was it actually the men who sent him out there with no direct contact to make sure he was doing what they wanted him to do? In a sense the book asks who actually stripped Kurtz of his humanity. Was it the men who sent him out to conquer the people or was it himself for doing what he thought was right? The film decidedly points to Kurtz being his own demise, but still lightly questions the men at home making the…
- 731 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
After setting foot on the land and beginning his journey to the Inner Station, Marlow observes a group of slaves, from which a particular one stands out in his decimated clothing and deprived appearance. Marlow, in vain, offers the slave a biscuit immediately before they die of hunger right before his eyes (28). This simple encounter echoes the irrefutable damages caused by imperialism and the idea that no matter what anyone does to try and reverse the effects, including Europeans themselves, the damage that has been done has been set in stone for centuries to come. As noted in Edward Said’s essay critiquing Heart of Darkness, “Conrad… could clearly see… imperialism was pure dominance, [but] he could not conclude that imperialism had to end so that natives could lead lives free of European domination” (Said par. 18). This quote unequivocally supports the notion that Europe became a necessary crutch for Africa, and provides evidence for the transformation of darkness to convey the idea of the long-lasting effects of…
- 994 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
In the book Heart of Darkness there are several aspects to imperialism. As Marlow travels from the Outer Station to the Central Station and finally up the river to the Inner Station, he encounters scenes of torture, cruelty, and near-slavery. At the very least, the incidental scenery of the book offers a harsh picture of colonial enterprise. The impetus behind Marlow's adventures, too, has to do with the hypocrisy inherent in the rhetoric used to justify imperialism. The men who work for the Company describe what they do as "trade," and their treatment of native Africans is part of a benevolent project of "civilization." Kurtz, on the other hand, is open about the fact that he does not trade but rather takes ivory by force, and he describes his own treatment of the natives with the words "suppression" and "extermination": he does not hide the fact that he rules through violence and intimidation. His perverse honesty leads to his downfall, as his success threatens to expose the evil practices behind European activity in Africa. However, for Marlow as much as for Kurtz or for the Company, Africans in this book are mostly objects: Marlow refers to his helmsman as a piece of machinery, and Kurtz's African mistress is at best a piece of statuary. It can be argued that Heart of Darkness participates in an oppression of nonwhites that is much more sinister and much harder to remedy than the open abuses of Kurtz or the Company's men."Everything belonged…
- 681 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The id is categorized on pleasure; the part of our psyche which corresponds with our instincts, the ego is based on one’s conscience and is responsible for carrying out the absurd demands in a realistic fashion, while the super-ego is based on one’s conscience in a society and is accountable for comprehending the brain’s values/morals. Kurtz is the paramount character in Joseph Conrad’s “Heart of Darkness”. Working in the country of Africa in representation of one of the biggest Belgian trading companies, he is presented as a man with a great deal of talents. "The original Kurtz had been educated partly in England, and - as he was good enough to say himself — his sympathies were in the right place. His mother was half-English, his father was half-French. All Europe contributed to the making of Kurtz […]." (2.29) Throughout the beginning of the novel, Kurtz represents Europe’s way of life and seems to represent it well. In Europe, all he is exposed to is a civilized and contained environment in which social norms are able to guide him and lead him from going astray. In this environment, Kurtz was able to balance the aspects of his id and his super-ego easily. In other words, he was capable of knowing his limitations when it came to achieving his desires. However, after going to Africa, he seems to undergo a drastic change in personality and in conscience. His morality and his psyche all seem to deteriorate. Being…
- 1457 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Heart of darkness is not only an attack on colonialism, but also a criticism of the dark greed that the human heart retains. Moreover, most of the content of the novel is pervaded by symbolic meanings among which destiny and foreshadowing play a leading role, and such is their relevance that both of them are consistently present explicitly and metaphorically throughout the novel. Therefore, the apparently innocent journey to the Congo to meet Kurtz masks a deeper meaning, a symbolic journey to the bottom of the human heart, a heart thirsty for power and wealth ―the heart of darkness ― which is represented by Kurtz and the colonialist lifestyle that surrounds him. “Kurtz 's methods had ruined the district… They only showed that Mr. Kurtz lacked restraint in the gratification of his various lusts, that there was something wanting in him -- some small matter which, when the pressing need arose, could not be found under his magnificent eloquence”.…
- 2108 Words
- 9 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Throughout the imperial conquests of Africa, Europeans in general held very low opinions of those that they dominated. Instead viewing the native African people as sub-human, or tools if they were particularly fond of an individual. While Heart of Darkness presents itself as anti-imperial, Marlow, and by extension Conrad still display an astonishingly undesirable view of the tribes assisting himself and Kurtz. For example, there exists an International Society for the Suppression of Savage Customs that Kurtz writes a report for. To Marlow it is an elegant paper that he cannot help but praise for its elegance. The contents of this paper suggest that the Europeans, to, “exert a power for good,” must appear as gods, deities, and supernatural beings…
- 403 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
In both texts, there are individuals showcasing major facets motivated by greed, obsessed with the stimulus that is presented in either century. In Conrad’s Heart of Darkness, the character ‘Kurtz’ is primarily stimulated by greed. His obsession with ivory was at an extreme where main character ‘Marlow’ refers to his physical appearance as “like a ball- an ivory ball” and as having an “ivory face.” These respective simile and metaphors encapsulate how Kurtz had become gripped by ivory to the point where it was taking over his very being. This description that Kurtz is placed in is carried through to his dying moments where “The brown current ran swiftly out of the Heart of Darkness-Kurtz’s life was running swiftly, too…” This indirect juxtaposition links the ideas of Kurtz’s life with the Heart of Darkness, not being a physical location, but an internalised nature representing Kurtz. These links of the rapacious Kurtz to a being of pure immorality is an insight into the overtaken existence of greed within individuals of evil.…
- 1192 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Madness is another major theme in the story. Kurtz has clearly gone mad from being in the congo too long. He speaks of killing people like it is nothing. However, his madness could be due to the lack of authority he has to answer to, leading to his abuse of power.…
- 743 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Hawkins argues that Conrad implements the evolutionary trope in Heart of Darkness, but also exposes the downfall of Europeans by showing their desire for merciless control and inhumane actions to control the African colonies. An evolutionary trope is a developmental logic that white civilization is more advanced than African civilizations (Lecture 2/16/17). Kurtz himself is a representation of Europe because he is a civilized man who becomes barbaric and savage after living in Africa. In addition, Hawkins noted that in Heart of Darkness, racism explicitly occurred as “Conrad likely didn’t show more of the Africans because he wanted to focus on the Europeans” (370). Much like Kurtz himself, Conrad and Marlow conceal a lot in their use of sophisticated words and diction. In addition, their high-strung eloquence is very underrated; people will do anything that the voice asks them to do, including the African people. Ultimately, by denying the humanity of Africa, Europeans are destroying their own humanity, and therefore, Europe is destroying…
- 1593 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays