Every society has some sort of control structure. The leadership can either be composed of the elected members or nominated associates of the legislature. This kind of management is a direct representation of the general public. Other informal leadership structure is made up of people who are tasked with the responsibility of observing the society’s welfare at an individual level. This form of headship can be found in various institutions such as churches, schools offices and community elders. The management structure is tasked with the role of the community welfare. It is within their mandate to guarantee that the society welfare and interest is observed. The local leadership has the responsibility of ensuring that development of the society is prioritized for the purpose of improving the communal living standards. This group would be interested in what Carr and Kefales wrote, because it emphasizes on the development and welfare of the society. The article has provided enough evidence about the effect of migration, especially, the young people. It has also demonstrated the impact of such movement and how it can affect the economy of a …show more content…
They have used emotional appeal and structured their argument in a chronological manner. Additionally, in providing substantial evidence to support the claim, Carr and Kefales have quoted The New York Times and Los Angeles times. Information provided is therefore, credible and authentic. They have also managed to present a clear state of events that are likely to occur as a result of youth migration. It worked because the audiences were able to relate to the situation; they were able to understand the practicality of the situation that would arise due to youth migration. The audience will also realize that with the increased rate of migration, the population that is left behind might not be able to react to the available resources. The development rate may decline due to insufficient labor force and a vital component that determine community