Preview

Hedonism: Morality and Q. no.

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2398 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Hedonism: Morality and Q. no.
Answer to Q. No. 1

Hedonism (Greek: hēdonē (ᾑδονή from Ancient Greek) "pleasure" +–ism) is a philosophical position that takes the pursuit of pleasure as the primary motivating element of life, based upon a view that "pleasure is good" i.e. pleasure has an ultimate importance and is the most important pursuit of humanity. The concept of pleasure is, however, understood and approached in a variety of ways, and hedonism is classified accordingly.

The three basic types of philosophical hedonism are psychological hedonism, which holds that the tendency to seek pleasure and avoid pain is an essential attribute of human nature; evaluative or ethical hedonism, which sets up certain ethical or moral ends as desirable because attaining them will result in happiness; and reflective, or normative hedonism, which seeks to define value in terms of pleasure. The ancient Greek philosophers Democritus, Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Epicurus (341 – 270 B.C.E.) and their followers developed ethical theories centered on the “good life” (the ideal life, the life most worth living, eudaimonia, happiness) and the role of pleasure of achieving it. (Ref:- http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Hedonism)

Objection against Hedonism
No general code of morality could be established on the basis of pleasure. Pleasure is essentially subjective feeling, and only the individual is the competent judge of how much pleasure or pain a course of action affords him. What is more pleasurable for one may be less so for another. Hence, on hedonistic grounds, it is evident that there could be no permanently and universally valid dividing line between right and wrong.

Answer to Q. No. 2
Classic utilitarian’s held hedonistic act consequentialism. Act consequentialism is the claim that an act is morally right if and only if that act maximizes the good, that is, if and only if the total amount of good for all minus the total amount of bad for all is greater than this net amount for any

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    C-500 Theory Outline

    • 1586 Words
    • 7 Pages

    ii. Views people as ‘responsibly hedonistic’ in essence that people strive to remain alive and happy…

    • 1586 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    There have been a few arguments against the theory of hedonism. The strongest objection to hedonism is the “Experience Machine.” The Experience Machine was introduced by a philosopher named Robert Nozick. Nozick offered a thought experiment which imagines that scientists came out with a machine in which a person can enter into and experience a world where they live their most joyous, pleasurable life. The machine would allow you to experience your perfect life, even though in reality it is just merely a simulation. If you choose to step in the machine, you will have no memory of going into it, nor will you know that it is a simulation. So the question is, if this type of machine were available to give you a simulation of a life where would…

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “The Experience Machine” is a thought experiment by Robert Nozick that imagines a machine that could give people whatever desirable or pleasurable experiences individuals could want. It would stimulate the person’s brain to cause pleasurable experiences that the subject could not distinguish from those apart from the machine. Hedonism is the idea that pleasure or happiness is the sole or chief good in life. As a hedonist, one tries to maximize net pleasure. A consideration of the experience machine shows that hedonism is flawed. According to hedonism, pleasure is the only thing humans seek. People should not consider the experience machine because it would bring pleasure all of the time. If people were given…

    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bwvw Study Guide

    • 1449 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Hedonism- Defines pleasure and pain according to human condition. (social condition) Ex. Pursuit of pleasure, comfort, safety and security in human terms. All struggle and pain is defined as evil. Delayed gratification is…

    • 1449 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Chapter 7 : The Hellenistic Era I learned about two Philosopher’s who were around during the Hellenistic Era ,the period from the death of Alexander in 323 BCE to the end of the Roman Republic 31 BCE in which Epicureanism, Stoicism and Skepticism flourished. The first philosopher I read about was Epicurus, who is considered to be the founder of Epicureanism which is the hedonistic theory that life’s highest aim is happiness that is attained through moderate pleasures and the avoidance of mental disturbances. Epicurus also found Hedonism which is the doctrine that pleasure is the supreme good. However Epicurus hedonism is a somewhat misunderstood.…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bentham said: ‘the principle of utility aims to promote happiness, which is the supreme ethical value… An act is right if it delivers more pleasure than pain and wrong if it brings about more pain than pleasure.’ To help people choose what would have the best possible consequence, Bentham provided a way of measuring it. This is the ‘hedonic calculus’. There are seven elements: the intensity of the pleasure; the duration of the pleasure; the certainty of the pleasure; the remoteness of the pleasure; the chance of succession of pleasures; the purity of the pleasure and lastly the extent of the pleasure. Bentham invented this to help people weigh up and measure how much pleasure an action will produce. Bentham was interested in the ‘greatest good…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the introduction to The Hedonism Handbook, the author Michael Flocker, tries to convey that the assumption: “If you avoid all things pleasurable, you will live a long and happy life,” is a fallacy- that the reasons for this assumption are wrong. He states that working every day, steering clear of anything that many be construed as something pleasurable, is something that this generation has adopted as being ‘happy.’ However, his argument that it is okay to seek pleasure and that we as a society have deemed it as wrong is not as sound as he tries to argue. We do not all feel happiness just from seeking pleasure. This may be effective in some instances, but people are not…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the article “The Good, Racist People,” Ta-Nehisi Coates discusses an event which resulted in Forest Whitaker being accused of shoplifting. What could possibly be a reason to assume Whitaker, a famous actor, had committed shoplifting? From Coates’ point of view, many others want to believe that this encounter was a misunderstanding that had nothing to do with race. Whitaker was accused of shoplifting and then was frisked, based only on his appearance. Coates then goes on to claim that the owner’s apology argued that the incident was a “‘sincere mistake’ and how the worker was a ‘decent man’ who was ‘just doing his job’ ”. (par. 3) In this quote, we are seeing an excuse trying to justify this event, for which Coates wants to believe the apology.…

    • 1382 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Psychological Egoism

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Let’s consider the chapters on Hedonism and the connection between our pursuit of happiness and the consequential behavior that is then elicited; as well as the natural law theory which persuades followers to behave naturally. In both cases these behaviors were motivated by our understanding of what’s moral and what’s immoral. It’s essential to make the distinction between the theories themselves and the resulting behavior that’s performed.. The discussion of our ethical considerations, however, goes “hand in hand” with our behaviors because without one, it’s impractical to consider the other. These ideas are…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The truth is not always going to be the same for everyone. In Travels With Charley by John Steinbeck, the narrator John Steinbeck and his poodle Charley go to the Badlands in North Dakota While on this treacherous journey they meet two people who seem like polar opposites. He meets a man of few words who had mere conversations and a talkative old woman who could not seem to know when to keep her mouth shut. These two people live in the same environment, yet they reacted differently to the environmental setting they live in. This causes them to have different truths about the harsh yet beautiful Badlands. They each have a different perspective on this location. The man of few words seems to enjoy the environment while the talkative lady does…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Eros, this concerns our desire for pleasure, particularly the pleasure associated with our bodily desires for sex and food. If it feels good, it is good.…

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Paper on Epicurus

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There are two types of pleasure that we endure. The two are Kinetic and katastematic. The kind of pleasure we receive from kinetic is such as performing something just like eating or drinking. The food now makes us happier and satisfied for time being. Basically kinetic is some sort of activity that makes you feel happy. When your happy, you are more prone to live a exciting and progressive life. Katastematic gives us pleasure that feels like almost being totally isolated. What this means is you are receiving pleasure from not being distracted or bugged by others, makes you feel free. The absence of katastematic pleasure in the soul, is the highest good according to Epicures. The importance of kinetic and katastematic pleasures is that they occur in the body and soul.…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “Those that study particular sciences, and neglect philosophy, are like Penelope's wooers, that make love to the waiting women”(Aristippus). Aristippus a man who collided constantly clashing with Plato and was taught by Socrates, a sophist who was frowned upon by others. Notoriously known for being one of the wittiest philosophers of all time for example, when he encountered a fellow who boasted that he could drink a great deal and not become drunk. To this he replied, “So can a mule.” He founded hedonism because he believed that life is one that pursues pleasure while simultaneously avoiding pain also, the life that is best is one that pursues pleasure while simultaneously avoiding pain. V was a hedonist, throughout V for Vendetta he was…

    • 197 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When I read this part of the passage in my textbook about being hook to an “experience machine” that would guarantee a constant state of happiness and positive emotion did cross my mind. I thought about what it would be like just to feel the constant emotion of being happy. At first I thought it would be an incredible experience. Never having to worry, or to feel sad, to feel rejected or lonely would be awesome not to feel those emotions anymore. However, to be in a constant state of being happy and always positive could take away the fulfillment of actually living life. Eudaimonic is defined as self-realization, meaning the expression and fulfillment of inner potential. So from this perspective, the good life results from living in accordance with your true self. It’s a process in which our talents, needs, and deeply held values direct the way we conduct our lives. The hedonic view captures a major element of what we mean by happiness in everyday terms: we enjoy life, we are satisfied with how our…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarian ethics is an expansive field of normative ethics that believes that the action that you take should be that which maximises utility, that is to say prospering and maximizing happiness whilst mitigating suffering or sadness as much as possible. Whilst it was once often considered a hedonistic field, there being one that argues pleasure being the only true, intrinsic good or aim, it is now more commonly referred to that of a consequentiality field, focussed more on consequentialism. It may be argued then that there is quite a difference between the seemingly 'old Utilitarianism' and that of the new consequentialism.…

    • 616 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays