Hegemonic Masculinity Essay

Introduction:
Main focus of this essay is to determine that hegemonic masculinity is basically like traits associated with being a man so like being violent, strong dominating women, being sexually experienced, which the topic of this specific essay. Gender activists and many others who tried to change men's behaviour and relations with women, have mobilised hegemonic masculinity. An example of The Macho Factory (Machofabroken) is given to explain practical challenges of utilising masculinity and gender theory.
Gender is a term which specifically refers to cultural and social distinctions associated with being female, male or intersex. Gender is a cultural and social construct of what represents being a "man" or "woman", which based on characteristics
R., Jewkes. R. & Lindegger. G. (2012) described hegemonic masculinity as a set of different values, typically recognized by men in power, which acts to include and exclude and to organise society in unequal ways when it comes to gender. It is a combination of various features such as discrepancy access among men to power over women, a hierarchy of masculinities and relationship between men's power, interactions, identity, patriarchy and ideals. Hegemonic masculinity helps in identifying attitudes, behaviours and practices of men that perpetuate gender inequality specially related with men's domination over women.
There is wrong understanding that men are unified category and they have to suppression women necessarily who are uniform category. However, it is far from reality and there are various forms of masculinities, which lead a relationship to domination not only between men and women but also between men and men. Hegemonic masculinity helps to determine that how masculinities generate domination. Hegemonic masculinity is a concept which is initially formulated to highlight the practices that promote and enhance favourable social behaviour and condition of men over women (Morettini, 2016).
Figure
Vicious and sexist manly qualities and practices might be, yet are not, really hegemonic in a given culture. The counter contention is that men who utilize brutality and undermine savagery regularly have an impressive collection of ordinary demonstrations of low-level viciousness, especially coordinated against their accomplice at home, and this does not lessen their open stature. Given the private idea of close accomplice viciousness and successive hesitance of ladies to discuss it, a lot of its utilization is never thought about by those outside the personal relationship (Beasley,