Helen Hurd's Impartiality Principles

6

Theory Assignment
1. A professional is a skilled, knowledgeable, individual that carries themselves in a specific manner. Their occupation is devoted to a certain profession. Helen Hurd's definition of a professional stem from her passage. It states that a professional is some who knows the objective, displays professional attitude, and understands the patterns of relationships. Other qualities that they display our understanding of others, growth, and development in their field, and have planning abilities. There are similarities in the definitions. The main similarity in the definitions is the service that they provide to their profession. They want to make themselves better, so the profession becomes better.

2. The three major divisions
No, the impartiality principle consists of everyone being equals. When the Mayor decided only to clean the side of the city that paid more taxes this rule was violated. The impartiality principle insists that all persons are considered equal and should be treated accordingly. If the mayor was sincere to his entire city, he would have had the street sweepers to clean the entire city with no guidelines attached.
4. Objectivism can be explained as the doctrine that some moral norms or principles are valid for everyone. The doctrine that knowledge, truth, and morality exist in relation to culture, society, or historical context, and are not absolute. (google). With relativism, there are two aspects. Culture relativism views that an action is morally right if one culture approves it. Subjective relativism is the view that wrongness is relative if one approves of it. I am not a cultural relativist. I cannot state that an action is morally right just because one's culture approves of it. For instance, slavery. I look back the Indians. One culture thought that it was okay to lie, cheat, betray the Indians. You will have some opponents for each cause, but the majority
He believed that actions that have moral value only if they are done with a good will. Doing right and observing moral law. Be123.
There are several similarities between these two philosophers. Both recognized intermediate moral rules, called by Kant "duties" and by Mill "subordinate principles. They both had base values in their theories. not to lie, to be beneficent, not to steal, not to deprive others of liberty.
They also differed in many ways. Their definition of good was defined to happiness and goodwill. Another key difference that is Kant want individual goodness, while Mill wanted good for all people. Cite email.
8. Jean-Jacques Rousseau's theory of the social contract he explores the ideas and alienable versus rights. He speaks that man is born free. He believes that man should be free of natural liberties. The general will of the people is correct according to Rousseau's. The similarities between the two philosophers are Aristotle agrees with Rousseau that the master/slave relationship is, or at least should be, one that exists for the mutual benefit of both (1) a need for self-sufficiency.
The differences are Rousseau's Theory thinks a man should not be governed while Aristotle believes in political