In Aristotle's book the Metaphysics, he calls the cause of all movement the Prime Mover (P.M). The Prime Mover to Aristotle is the first of all substances, the necessary first sources of movement which itself is unmoved. It is a being which is eternal, and in Metaphysics Aristotle also calls this being ‘God’. However, before he came to know the existence of the P.M he first started noticing the constant changes around him, which led him to question the existence and the purpose of the world, universe and the things around us.…
Throughout Plato’s Republic, Socrates formulates an argument that is cohesive with the notion that one’s soul consists of three parts. He begins this argument by alluding to the fact that we need to determine whether or not the parts of our soul are similar, or different. “The same thing will not be willing to do or undergo opposites in the same part of itself, in relation to the same thing, at the same time,” this statement is an effective premise in his argument due to its unified applicability within the confines of ones soul. If ones…
In the Second Dialogue between Philonous and Hylas, Philonous defends his philosophy that there is no such thing as matter and concludes that God is the ultimate cause of all our ideas. However, I have different opinions on Philonous’ claim that all ideas come from God.…
13. Rene Descartes – believed in dualism and mechanistic view (both the mind and body are separated from each other); humans are the exception to the mechanistic view (the brain and body are connected somehow because the brain controls the body and the body provides information for the brain to interpret); believed that animals are made to work like machines and in the cavities of an animal’s brain, they had fluid that had spirits that…
Religious opinions affected Socrates’ life a great deal. Whereas most Athenians observed polytheism and believed in gods such as Poseidon and Hades, Socrates believed there was only one god responsible. Interestingly enough, when asked, Socrates could not put a name to this god or give an explanation. The most he could say was that the god spoke in his mind and gave him advice, like a conscience. He called this his daemon. Conversely, in a world where many things, such as thunder, were scientifically unexplainable, people were very attracted to religion as justification. Socrates on the other hand, stated that clouds created thunder and lightning rather than Zeus. Such statements more than likely came from Socrates’ younger years when he was a student of Anaxagoras. While studying Anaxagoras’ work, Socrates learned that the Selene, the goddess of the moon, was not real and that the moon had hills and valleys and shone with reflected light. Of the sun, Socrates gathered additionally that Apollo was not real, and that the sun was a very hot rock. This not only shaped Socrates’ religious life but also affected the way he interacted with people and changed their perceptions.…
Although the cosmological argument was expressed by Aquinas it was originally introduced and influenced by Aristotle. Aristotle stated ‘the series must start with something since nothing can come from nothing’. This suggests that Aristotle believed that the creation of universe is dependent on a supreme, ultimate primary mover, and is therefore an ‘unmoved mover’. Overall it is the vital cause of the creation of the universe, and is identified in Christianity as God. Aristotle persuaded this using the idea of planet motion which he highlighted as the cause of the change of seasons. For this transformation to happen, it required an ‘unmoved mover’ who would be capable of upholding order of the universe during the alterations. Aquinas used this concept as the labour of God.…
Rene Descartes (1596-1650) was a French philosopher but also the one the first to conclude that the Universe was made up of two elements. One of which was the physical matter or the human body, and the other was the soul, spirit, self, or the human mind.…
Light is apart from time, space, and matter, yet it fills the voids of our existence and sustains all life. Light has no mass, no distance, and is constant in time and presence. Christ is the "Light of the World". This idea had remained the same throughout the time period and was supported in the fields of science which left this idea to go unchanged. Many scientific reformers such as Isaac Newton, and Nicolaus Copernicus had said that God was the source of their knowledge and the reason for their…
Early Greek philosophy attempted to explain the universe on the basis of unifying principles. P80…
In this essay it will be argued that the soul is mortal and does not survive the death of the body. As support, the following arguments from Lucretius will be examined: the “proof from the atomic structure of the soul,” the “proof from parallelism of mind and body,” the “proof from the sympatheia of mind and body,” and the “proof from the structural connection between mind and body.” The following arguments from Plato will be used as counterarguments against Lucretius: the “cyclical argument,” the “affinity argument,” the “argument from the form of life,” and the “recollection argument.” It will be shown that Plato’s premises lack validity and that Lucretius’ position is the more reasonable of the two.…
Parmenides was a famous Greek philosopher that appears to have strange views to modern day people. Parmenides stated that change, any change, is but an illusion (Velasquez, 2014). This means that the most complex changes such as the creation of a new human life to the simple turning of a page is an illusion. I had a very hard time wrapping my head around the views of Parmenides. His teachings made very little sense in my head. How could everything we view be an illusion? Does this simply mean that life is simply not real but an illusion as he states? An expert from the passage quotes Zeno, a pupil of Parmenides. In this quote Zeno attempts to validate his teacher’s views by using the change in distance travel as an illusion (Velasquez, 2014). It may be the translation or the quote itself but it was fairly too complex for someone who is not a philosopher. Not only did this confuse me,…
* Anaxagoras accepted the principle that all changes in the objects of experience are in reality changes in the arrangements of underlying particles, he believed that everything was infinitely divisible. He was the man who introduces Philosophy to Athens; also he introduced into metaphysics an important distinction between matter and mind. Anaxagoras stated that each kind of substance has its own corresponding kind of particle and that each substance contains particles of every other kind. He postulated that the source of all motion is something called nous and by nous he meant pretty much an equation between mind and reason. I think he was not that far away from reality, to be a man living in that time, without the instruments we have today he was close to defining the nature of reality. He believed that the universe was infinite (which so far is true), and that it was an undifferentiated mass, which is also true. About the formation of the world, he said that it was the result of a rotatory motion produced in this mass by mind. About this he is not that correct. One of the theories about how everything began Is the Bing Bang Theory… that a big star exploded and out of that dust the planets were created… it might have been because of rotation but not in mind. The Christian people would agree more on this, because they would state that it was created on the mind of God omnipotent.…
List major similarities among the alternative visions explored in this chapter. Why did they all fail to achieve their objectives? Did they have any important legacies?…
The thought of proving the philosopher wrong sounds easy but really in the end the narrator discovers that Heraclitus was actually right because he became more affected by the changes than he actually realized. These changes began to show their affect after he had begun to live in the small town for a stretch of years to himself and fishing everyday in the simple, constant creek. But the reason for fishing in the creek was because it was his passion, the reason for life to live on especially a main reason for living in town and also the narrator had two other friends who were married to each other. The problems begin to arise as the seasons begin to change for his friend had many jobs before living in this town and fishing became the most important thing to be accomplished. Although, the female friend only ever wanted to write novels but nobody was being published and as the narrator began to hang out more and more with them there began to be subtle changes throughout their friendship as well as the couple’s marriage. As seasons began to change, everything was different especially the river and the marriage ended and his whole world turned with such a change. The narrator helped his friends load up their things and watched them…
Many individuals have attempted to start a union for farm workers. The only one to succeed, however, was Cesar Chavez. He was a man with great qualities. He had a clear goal, courage, he was willing to sacrifice and he was for the people and with the people. Cesar Chavez was an effective leader because he was for the people, practiced non-violent protest, and boycotted the grape industry.…