Preview

High Work Performance System

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3807 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
High Work Performance System
1 Introduction

High-performance work system (HPWS) can be defined as a specific combination of HR practices, work structures, and processes that maximizes employee knowledge, skills, commitment, and flexibility (Bohlander & Snell, 2004, p. 690, Marchington and Wilkinson, 2008, P92). A basic aim of HPWS is leveraging human resource system to improve employees’ overall contribution and performance by enhancing their discretion, competency and commitment.

Among enormous researches of HPWS, researchers have empirically established a positive relationship between HPWS and a variety of organizational performance such as turnover (Guthrie, 2001; Huselid, 1995), labor productivity (Huselid, 1995), firm productivity (Guthrie, 2001), and firm financial performance (Guthrie, 2001; Huselid, 1995).

Before we discuss further about HPWS, we need to sort out its main conceptual companions: high-involvement work systems (HIWSs) and high-commitment management (HCM). ‘High commitment management’ (Walton 1985; Guest 2001a, 2001b; Wood & de Menezes, 1998) highlights the role of effective human resource management in enhancing employee commitment and thereby reducing the need for managerial control. And ‘high involvement work system’ (Wood 1999a; Lawler, 1986) is particularly used to emphasize the importance of opportunities for employees to make decisions and exercise discretion. ‘High performance work systems’ (Berg 1999; Appelbaum et al 2000), aim at reducing turnover, absenteeism and costs through a reduction in the need for control and monitoring (Ramsay et al., 2000). In comparison, HPWS appear to be more comprehensive as it usually entails effort on improving both employees’ commitment and involvement. Despite the variation in terminology, the concept is similar: a particular bundle of human resource practices have the potential to engender improved organizational performance (Hegan, 2006).

1.1 Comparison to Taylorism

If we want to examine the implications



References: 1. Appelbaum, E., Bailey, T., Berg, P. and Kalleberg, A (2000). Manufacturing advantage: why high performance work systems pay off., Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY. ILR Press (an imprint of Cornell University Press) 2 3. Barker, J. R. (1993). “Tightening the iron cage: Concertive control in self-managing teams”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, pp 408-437. 4. Barker, J. R., & Cheney, G. (1994).“The concept and the practices of discipline in contemporary organizational life”,. Communication Monographs, 61, pp 19-43. 5. Batt, Rosemary. (2004) “Who Benefits from Teams? Comparing the Outcomes for Managers, Supervisors, and Workers,” Industrial Relations. 43(1): pp 183-213. 6. Becker Brian and Barry Gerhart (1996) “The Impact of Human Resources Management on Organizational Performance: Progress and Prospects”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol.39 No.4, pp 779-801 7 8. Berg, P, Kalleberg, A.L.and Appelbaum, E (2003.) "Balancing Work and Family: The Role of High-Commitment Environments," Industrial and Labor Relations 42:168–88. 9. Berg, P., & Kalleberg, A. L. (2002).“ The effect of high performance work practices on job stress: Evidence from a survey of U.S. workers”. Conference on Work Intensification. Paris. 10. Boxall, P. and Purcell, J. (2003) Strategy and human resource management. Palgrave Macmillan, London. 11. Boxall, P. and Macky K, J. (2009). “Research and theory on high-performance work systems: progressing the high involvement stream.” Human Resource Management Journal, Vol 19, no 1, 2009, pp 3–23. 12. Butler, P., Felstead, A., Ashton, D., Fuller, A., Lee, T., Unwin, L and Walters, S. (2004). “High performance management: a literature review. Learning as Work” Research Paper No1, Centre for Labour Market Studies, University of Leicester. 13. Cappelli, P. and Rogovsky, N (1994). “New work systems and skill requirements” International Labor Review, 133:2, pp205-20. 14. Cappelli, P. and Neumark, D. (2001). “Do ‘High Performance’ work practices improve establishment-level outcomes?” Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 54, pp 737-775. 15. Danford, A. (2003) “Workers, unions and the high performance workplace.” Work, employment and society, 17(3), 569-587. 18. Edwards, P., & Wright, M. (2001) “High-involvement work systems and performance outcomes: The strength of variable, contingent and context- bound relationships” International Journal of Human Resource Management, 12(4), pp 565-569. 19. Felstead, A. and Gallie, D. (2002). “For better or worse? Non-standard jobs and high involvement work systems.” SKOPE Research Paper No 29, University of Warwick. 20. Freeman, Richard B. and Morris M. Kleiner. (2000). "Who Benefits Most from Employee Involvement: Firms or Workers?" American Economic Review 90 (May): pp 219-223. 21. Godard, J (2004). “A critical assessment of the high performance work paradigm”. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 42:2, pp 349-378. 22. Godard, J. (2001). “High-performance and the transformation of work? The implications of alternative work practices for the experience and outcomes of work.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 54,pp 776-805. 23. Guest, D (1999). “Human resource management – the workers’ verdict.” Human Resource Management Journal, 9:4,pp 5-25. 24. Guthrie, J. (2001). “High involvement work practices, turnover, and productivity: Evidence from New Zealand”,. Academy of Management Journal, 44, pp 180-192. 25. Hegan, Shannon. J. (2006). “Employees’ Responses to High Performance Work Systems: Assessing HPWS Effectiveness.” Otago Management Graduate Review, Vol.04: pp 25-35. 26. Harley, B. (2002). “Employee responses to high performance work system practices: An analysis of the AWIRS95 data.” Journal of Industrial Relations, 44(3), pp 418-34. 27. Hetrick, W.P. & Boje, D.M.(1992) "Post modernity & Organization: The Body & Post-Fordist Control," Journal of Organizational Change Management, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp : 48-57. 28. Huselid, M. A. (1995). “The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity and financial performance.” Academy of Management Journal, 38: pp 635-672. 32. McDuffie, J.P. and Kochan, T.A. (1995). “Do US firms invest less in human resources? Training in the world auto industry.” Industrial Relations, 34:2, pp 147-168. 33. Macky, K& Boxall, P(2007), “ The Relationship between High Performance Work Practices and Employee Attitudes: An Investigation of Additive and Interaction Effects,” International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18:4, pg 537-567. 34. Marchington. M and Wilkinson, A. N. (2008). “Human resource management at work.” The Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development, pp 92-137. 35. Pfeffer, J. (1998). The human equation: building profits by putting people first. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, Mass. 8(1), pp 3-20. 36. Ramsay, H., Scholarios, D.and Harley, B. (2000). “Employees and high-performance work systems: testing inside the black box.” British Journal of Industrial Relations, 38:4, pp 501-531. 37. Tomer, John F. 2001. “Understanding High Performance Work Systems: The Joint Contribution of Economics and Human Resource Management.” The Journal of socio-economics, pp 3-17. 38. Whitener, E. M. (2001) “Do ‘‘high commitment’’ human resource practices affect employee commitment? A cross-level analysis using hierarchical linear modeling.” Journal of Management, 27, pp 515-535. 39. White, M., Hill, S., McGovern, P., Mills, C., & Smeaton, D. (2003) “High performance management practices, working hours and work-life balance.” British Journal of Industrial Relations, 41(2), pp 175-195. 40. Wood ,S (1996), “ High Commitment management and Payment systems,” Journal of Management Studies, 33(1):pp 53-77.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    There are numerous high performance work practices, Like employees involvement and job autonomy, both tends to improve decision making and employee motivation. They often form to self directed…

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Week 5 Assignment BUS 303

    • 2539 Words
    • 8 Pages

    High performance work systems are integrating employees’ talents and skills and technology in order to maximize them together to achieve the desired results. In order for an organization to achieve high competency levels and a competitive advantage through high performance work systems, the organization must first of all identify top talent. Personnel Selection is the methodical placement of individuals into jobs. Its impact on the organization is realized when employees achieve years or decades of service to the employer.…

    • 2539 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Week 3 Team Assignment

    • 1495 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Cascio, W.F. (2013). Managing Human Resources: Productivity, Quality of Work Life, Profits (9th ed.) Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill/Irwin…

    • 1495 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bibliography: M. Marchington & A. Wilkinson, 2008, Human Resource Management at Work 4th Edition, London, CIPD…

    • 2146 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    in disjoint sets of journals, drawing on mostly separate disciplinary foundations. Yet, operations and human resources are intimately related at a fundamental level. Operations are…

    • 16898 Words
    • 68 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sung, J., Ashton, D. (2005) High Performance Work Practices: linking strategy and skills to performance outcomes…

    • 2279 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The concept of high performance work practices (HPWP) is the accumulation of four practices that produce the most value of human capital which are employee involvement, job autonomy, competency development, and rewards based on performance. As researchers McShane and Von Glinow (2015) have explained, employees are a major source of competitive advantage in the workplace. On that note, organizations are responsible in empowering employees by allowing them the freedom to make decisions and providing them with the effective resources to fulfill their job duties. Lastly, employers are to reward their employees whether it is financially or non financially based on their performance in order to have the best outcome of HPWP.…

    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Work and non-work relation

    • 3889 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Pleck, J.H., Staines, G.L., and Lang, L. (1980). Conflict between work and family life. Monthly Labor Review, 103, 29-32.…

    • 3889 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The primary goal of most businesses is to maximize profits for the owners. High performance work practices (HPWPs) are a methodology used by various organizations to maximize workforce potential. HPWP is a combination of various theoretical models working alongside a receptive organizational climate and culture. This analysis will state the merits of HPWPs on employers and scrutinize its shortcoming on employees. The essay has been structured by introducing the concept of HPWPs as defined in available literature along with key findings. Thereafter the relevant theories pertaining to HPWP will be presented. Here the relevancy of the social exchange theory, Expectancy theory, and the labour process theory to HPWPs will be analysed. Subsequently the focus of the essay will be on the benefits of HPWPs to employers followed by an analysis of its negative effects on employees. To conclude this essay I will state that while HPWPs are found to be favourable for organizations from a purely profit centric view, its long term effects are undesirable for both the employer and employee.…

    • 1659 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    High Performance Working

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages

    However, this method of organisational working wasn’t able to cope with quick changing demands placed on businesses by society, the economy and government for example. As such, new forms of work organisations began to be looked at. Researchers began looking at ways of working which had greater flexibility and social responsibility.…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Anderson-Connolly, R., Grunberg, L., Greenberg, E. S., & Moore, S. (2002). Is lean mean?: Workplace transformation and employee well-being. Work, Employment & Society, 16, 389–413.…

    • 9163 Words
    • 37 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Definitions of Hrd

    • 2369 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Swanson, R. A. (1995). Performance is the key. [Electronic version]. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 6(2), pp. 207-13.…

    • 2369 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The primary principles that support high-performance work systems are four simple but powerful principles, these principles are the building blocks for an organization using HPWS. Since using the HPWS Tomex increased their performance significantly. The first principle of HPWS is Engalitarianism and Engament, this principle eliminates status and power differences and increases collaboration and teamwork. During Tomex transition to HPWS the company’s manager changed the job classification to two “employees were reorganized into self-managed teams empowered to make decisions typically made by managers and supervisors” by doing this, Tomex is applying the first pillar of HPWS since they are eliminating status and power differences. The second building block is Shared information, members in the organization hold ten-minute meetings at the beginning and end of each meeting, to discuss problems, focus on goals and check performance, workers are “aquainted with the nature of their own work and are therefore in the best position to recognize problems”. The third principle is Knowledge Development, Tomex applied it by having their brand new employees highly trained, they were required to expend more than 30% in the job training, by doing this Tomex ensured that all of their employees were more well rounded and they were working and learning in a “real time” environment using innovative new approaches to solve problems. The last but not least building block is Performance-Reward Linkage is that employees will pursue successful outcomes in exchange to have a beneficial result for themselves, I believe Tomex workers would benefit themselves by being their own managers, they did not have to worry to bring their work to someone’s table or…

    • 951 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There have been countless efforts over the years to understand the numerous factors and desires that determine and help to fully appreciate the intensity, quality, efficiency and reliability of the work performance of an employee. Since the eventual progress of learning and observation of the environment and factors has led to the conclusion that an employee’s performance is one of the most distinguishing factors that the organization or a business needs to cultivate in order for the organization to succeed. Work has always existed and been around in one form or another throughout our history but it…

    • 1726 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    elements

    • 2015 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Developing and maintaining a high performances organization in today society can be challenge, organizations must have responsiveness, speed, and quality that is beyond the reach of individual performance. When the organization has a high performances teams generate commitment and provide the elements that inspire employees to give their very best. need to ensure that they are using an organizational elements that matches today 's demanding business environment. Through the two organizations that we discuss are; UC San Diego and the hospital, both of these organizations are high performance organizations.…

    • 2015 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays