Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

history assignment Ancient Rome

Good Essays
862 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
history assignment Ancient Rome
HISTORY ASSIGNMENT – ANCIENT ROME

Hello, Australian Historical Society! I am an expert in Roman History, and I have been asked to talk to you for an excessive four minutes. Please be aware that I am a very nervous person, especially in front of large groups of people, so I may or may not screw it up horribly. If I am ever inaudible or I stop abruptly it may be because my hands are shaking too much to be able to read the words I’m supposed to be saying, so please be patient.
The Gracchi (168-121BCE)
Tiberius Sempronius and Gaius Sempronius Gracchus, commonly known as the Gracchi, are Roman political reformers who, through their use of the Plebeian tribune, set Roman politics on a course that ended in the collapse of the republic. But their liberalism and overzealous desire to correct existing problems brought them up against Senatorial conservatives, who killed them.
Tiberius often disregarded the Senate’s authority. He brought his bills straight to the people and ignored the Senate. He also ignored Senatorial privilege over land affairs, sometimes extending his authority over what would usually be the Senate’s area of governing. He tried to run for second term, but was killed by the Senate in the ensuing riot.
While Tiberius had a mild and temperate disposition, his brother Gaius was impulsive and volatile. He was also an excellent speaker and an amazing politician. Gaius Gracchus showed how a tribune, with the support and adherence of the poor, could overcome the Senatorial leadership. He was extremely popular with the poor, often passing bills in their favour. He was so popular that he was re-elected for a second term, the first Roman politician to do so.
However, after his supporters were either converted or expelled from Rome by the Senate, he failed to be re-elected for his third term and so ordered a servant to kill him. Since the Senate often took such violent stances against the Gracchi, many popular leaders saw the danger of the Senate. This distrust within the government lead to the inevitable collapse of the Roman republic.
And now I’ll move on to my second topic. I apologise in advance for any mispronunciations.
Conquest of Britain (43-47CE)
Although Julius Caesar had visited Britain in 55 BCE and reported that the soil was good, the Romans did not invade and conquer Britain. In any case, there was plenty of food and people that could be used as slaves, so it was not a pressing matter. It wasn’t until 43 CE that the Romans, under the Emperor Claudius, decided to conquer Britain.
The Romans crossed the Channel from Boulogne and set up a base at Richborough in Kent. Different legions were sent to conquer different parts of Southern Britain. The 2nd legion set up their first base at Fishbourne, near Chichester in Sussex, and then continued to Exeter where they set up their main base. The 20th legion established their base at Colchester, the 14th legion at Leicester and the 9th at Longthorpe near Peterborough. Eleven British Kings surrendered to Claudius immediately while King Caratacus was easily defeated by the 20th legion and escaped to Wales.
By 47 CE, half the country had been conquered, but some Kings (like Caratacus) still resisted the Romans. Caratacus lost another battle to the Romans near the river Severn in 51 CE but escaped again and hid in the camp of the Brigantes tribe. However, the Queen of the Brigantes told the Romans that Caratacus was hiding with them. The Romans captured Caratacus and sent him to Rome as a slave.
In 60 CE, King Prastagus of the Iceni tribe, who had signed a peace treaty with the Romans, died. His wife, Boudicca, became Queen and intended to remain at peace with the Romans. However, the Romans said that all Prastagus' land and possessions now belonged to them. They attacked the Iceni tribe, taking their land and Prastagus' two daughters. Boudicca was, quite understandably, outraged at this, and so began planning her revenge on the Romans.
Boudicca joined forces with the Trinovantes and together they formed an army powerful enough to fight the Romans. Boudicca's army captured and burned London, Colchester and St Albans. The Romans were forced to raise the largest army they had ever had to defeat Queen Boudicca. The Romans killed anyone who opposed them. Boudicca poisoned herself to prevent the Romans from capturing her.
And that concludes my extremely tedious four-minute speech. I hope it was more enjoyable to listen to than it was to give, because otherwise it would’ve been the most atrocious thing you had ever had the misfortune of overhearing.
Thank you for your time.

BIBLOGRAPHY
Books
The Gracchi, by Henry Charles Boren
The Gracchi Marias and Sulla, by A. H. Beesley
AD 43: The Roman Invasion of Britain, A Reassessment, by John Manley
Roman Britain/Pelican History of Britain: 1, by Unknown Author
Websites
http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/ancient/appian-civwars1.asp visited: 28 March 2012 http://dante.udallas.edu/hutchison/Fall_of_Republic/gracchi_brothers.htm visited: 28 March 2012 http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/ancient/romans/questions_01.shtml visited: 29 March 2012 http://www.historyonthenet.com/Chronology/timelineroman.htm visited: 29 march 2012

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    o What the Senate allowed him to do as consul proved disastrous to the state as he set dangerous precedents and made it harder for the Senate to…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Gracchus brothers are two brothers named Tiberius and Gaius who were called tribunes. These two wanted to pass land reform legislations that would redistribute the land among the poor and veterans from the wealth aristocrats. The law stated that “No one citizen would be able to possess more than 620 acres of public land.” The senate of Rome didn't like what the brothers were doing so they immediately had them killed. In a way the brothers were killed just because they were trying to help the poor make a living or at least give them a chance to provide for their families.…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Augustus’ stepson Tiberius was well into middle age when he was confirmed as Rome’s princeps. He followed Augustus’ lead and repeatedly declined the recognition as head of state so he would not look too anxious for power. He finally accepted when he saw the Senate’s exasperation and he was confirmed as the head of state. Tiberius chose his nephew Germanicus as his heir instead of his son Drusus, but the death of Germanicus left him no choice but to make Drusus as the new heir. When Drusus died, Tiberius became despondent and left Rome for the island of Capri where he indulged in vice with other people.…

    • 246 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Tiberius Army Influence

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This is conveyed when Tiberius reduced his role when he retired to Capri – therefore determining that the princeps did not have to be based in Rome to rule-, assigning much of his power over to the Praetorian Guard Prefect Sejanus, who, Tacitus records Tiberius could speak “freely and unguardedly” with Sejanus regarding him as “the partner in my labours.” Ibid justifies what Tacitus is saying by “Tiberius believed him disinterested and listened trustingly to his advice, however disastrous”. Tiberius’ role is severely reduced during his time in Capri, as Sejanus was responsible for all communication between the Senate and the Princeps, much of which he intercepted as a means of corrupting the emperor so he could become Princeps, this is identified by Tacitus who suggests that “the ambitious Sejanus had his eyes on the Principate.” However Sejanus’ plans were discovered, the Praetorian Guard had grown more powerful in the absence of Tiberius from Rome, comprehends how influentially powerful the army has become in such a short amount of…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Roman emperor Caligula was one of the crulest rulers around. He would enjoy torturing people.He became emperor by smothering the last emperor (Tiberius) and the empire fell into his hands. He ruled for 5 years before being murdered. Before he bécame a amperes he was a politician.…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Beware the Ides of March

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Roman government was in ruin when Julius Caesar came to power in 49 BC. Rome was too large to control itself, and the only seat with effective power was the dictator. Caesar was the first emperor of Rome, and the Senate hated that he called himself king. The members of senate deemed him a tyrant, as seen in Plutarch: “Therefore the plots which had previously been formed separately, often by groups of two or three, were united in a general conspiracy, since even the populace no longer were pleased with present conditions, but both secretly and openly rebelled at his tyranny and cried out for defenders of their liberty.” (Plutarch LXXX) The Senate also wanted Caesar out of power because each of them wanted to become the dictator themselves, which would have resulted in further conflict and a bloodier war than the final Roman war.…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “The new emperor began his reign under the most favourable conditions” as he was everything Tiberius was not and as such, “…he fulfilled the highest hopes of the Roman People” . Tiberius’ unpopularity was polarized due to his predecessor’s, Augustus, popularity and legacy, which proved impossible to supersede or even equal. Caligula was also a blood relative to Augustus and Julius Caesar, whereas Tiberius was only an adopted son of Augustus. So, the Roman people believed that after Tiberius’ death that Caligula…

    • 2510 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Tiberius Gracchus had several motivations to reform. The first one was that the Tiberius’s energy and ambition on political because Tiberius wanted to recover public land for poor people, this assumption was based on some writing was posted on house-walls, porticoes, and monuments. The second motivation could be coming from Tiberius wanted to avenge his humiliation, since Tiberius rejected the 137 surrender terms, this behavior assumed that Tiberius wanted to against the senate on purpose in public; however, at the same time Tiberius was supported by the prominent senior senators as well, they provided huge power on Tiberius's reform. The third motivation could be that Tiberius wanted to safeguard the interests of the military. Since most Rome's…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gaius was a Roman general. He is known for annihilating manipular military formations and restructuring the structure of the legions into separate cohorts. Marius saw the need to increase troops and the requirements for recruiting policies to be relaxed. He helped defeat the Germanic tribes, which gave him the title of “the third founder of Rome”. He was a significant part in Rome’s switch from a Republic to an Empire. He even helped legions become more loyal to their generals than to the state itself. Marius was elected seven times to the position of consul. However, on his seventh election he decided to invade Rome, but died seventeen days into his seventh consulship.…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Appian once claimed “Tiberius lost his life because he followed up an excellent plan in too lawless a way”. Tiberius Gracchus proposed a plan which would redistribute land amongst Roman citizens. Though controversial, Tiberius’s plan was brilliant and well thought. However, the actions Tiberius took to have his plan made into a law were dishonorable and unruly.…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cicero, Roman Senator and Philosopher, set up specific qualities of an ideal Roman ruler. A clear role in what it takes to effectively lead. A leader must first lead a dignified life for them to lead a successful empire. Leaders must demonstrate a work ethic and ability to gain respect. With that respect, leaders must love and care for their subordinates to show their compassionate towards the Roman people. Leaders must then demonstrate ethics to provide plans that must be followed in order to bring success to their empire. Politically, Cicero’s ideals reflected on both Marcus Aurelius and Commodus in various distinct ways. Marcus Aurelius and Commodus were men that ruled the empire of Rome and their governance had a profound impact in the Roman history. However while Marcus Aurelius was a grown just, benevolent man who fought for the power of Rome and successfully won the battle, Commodus was young, ignorant, cruel ruler, who demanded respect soon after he took position as emperor, and seriously weakened Roman Empire.…

    • 859 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    the birth of the Roman Empire, the focus of this paper will be the presentation of the…

    • 2017 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The majority of the conspirators decided to assassinate him while the Senate sat in session. Because Julius Caesar and the conspirators would be the only ones inside the Senate building this created a perfect opportunity to carry out their dastardly plans. Hidden beneath their togas, the conspirators wielded their daggers and surprised Caesar with their mutiny.…

    • 247 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    "When Tiberius and Gaius Gracchus sought to establish the liberty of the common people and expose the crimes of the oligarchs, the guilty nobles took fright and opposed their proceedings by every means at their disposal" - Cicero. The Gracchi Brothers were revolutionary in both their goals and achievements, as they changed the politics, the economic situation and the social problems of the Roman Republic. During the Gracchi's existence, Rome was facing a number of social, political and economic problems. They were frustrated with the conservatism and selfishness of the oligarchy and so adopted methods that threatened the balance between the senate, the magistrates and the people, which had existed for a very long time - in this way they can be regarded as revolutionary.…

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    He included all people in the government by letting them have influence in the vote. He travelled to Rhodes for philosophical studies and, on the way, was kidnapped by pirates (Rinaldo 11-13). By been kidnapped by pirates, he increased his tactics by negotiating with them and then going back to slit their throats. He campaigned successfully for the consulship in 60 B.C. and made a deal with two of Rome’s leading figures, Pompey the Great and Crassus. Even while conquering Gaul, Caesar was thinking of the political picture back home. He hired key political people to act on his behalf in Rome while he was away. He crossed the Rubicon and marched on Rome at the head of his battle-hardened army, where he got through with ease. He also proved to be a good and fair victor by inviting some of his defeated rivals to join him in the government. Senators Gaius Cassius Longinus and Marcus Junius Brutus used to be enemies, and became friends in conspiring to assassinate Caesar (Rinaldo112-117). They betrayed Caesar and assassinated him on the Ides of March (the 15th), 44 B.C.…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays