Preview

Hobbes Of Human Nature: Good Or Evil?

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
166 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Hobbes Of Human Nature: Good Or Evil?
Human Nature: Good or Evil?

I agree with Hobbes, I believe that Human Nature is evil. Throughout time humans have proved not to be the salt of the Earth. Time and time again humans do horrible things. Human Nature is evil and selfish. Take World War II for example, Adolf Hitler slaughtered millions of Jews… because he wanted to. Hitler built concentration camps housing gas chambers and other means of eradicating European Jews. Also, the 200,000 hitler followers were no better than Hitler himself. They were the ones to do the actual killing, they starved and beat the innocent people in the extermination camps. The human race has seen its share of awful people. With the tensions rising in our generation about gender equality, or African
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Human Nature In Machiavelli And Hobbes
    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Human Nature In Machiavelli And Hobbes

    The understanding of human nature and the effects it has on the individual and society has been a serious topic in the philosophical world. Nicolo Machiavelli and Thomas Hobbes were well known for their crucial roles in forming the foundation of political philosophy. While reading through Machiavelli’s The Prince and Hobbes’ Leviathan, both introduced a common focus on political theory even though living approximately 100 years apart. While learning about these two philosophers and their proposed theories, I noticed an innate relationship in the discussion of society’s human nature. Machiavelli ([1532] 2006) in The Prince theorizes the qualities that a dominant leader should have to gain and maintain power.…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Thomas Hobbes: A Basis For Politics
    • 123 Words
    • 1 Page

    Thomas Hobbes: A Basis For Politics

    Thomas Hobbes was an English philosopher of the 1600’s that tried to create a basis for politics. Having experienced the English civil war, Hobbes realized that the conflict was the result of human nature. Hobbes exclaimed that the world was full of greedy people and those who are selfless and care only for themselves. Without the government to maintain order, Hobbes said that there would be “a condition of war of everyone against everyone”. Hobbes noted that in order to stop this, the people would have to sacrifice their freedom for the government. In exchange, they gained law and order. He also notes that this sacrifice would allow the government to suppress any form of rebellion. Hobbes called this agreement the social contract.…

    • 123 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Lord of the Flies--The Evils of Mankind
    • 1210 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Lord of the Flies--The Evils of Mankind

    Thomas Hobbes, an Enlightenment philosopher, claimed that mankind is naturally evil and selfish and will cause conflicts “if any two men desire the same thing, which they nevertheless cannot both enjoy” or have differing opinions, in order to gain more power so that they can freely pursue their selfish desires, especially “during the time men live without a common power” and “in that condition which is called war, every man against every man,” and are therefore incapable of self-governing. Hobbes’ position on human nature is easily observable; intolerance and bigotry causes violence and general public…

    • 1210 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Compare And Contrast Hobbes And John Locke
    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Compare And Contrast Hobbes And John Locke

    Many philosophers, such as John Locke and Thomas Hobbes, have discussed over the years if he human race is naturally good or evil. People than choice their side of the argument, one side believing that humans have a basically good nature that is corrupted by society, while the other side believes that humans have a bad nature that is kept in check by society. As John Locke believes that the human race is good, it is reasonable to accept as true because we are born neutral, with free will, and fear of a higher power.…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Hobbes' Remedy for
    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Thomas Hobbes' Remedy for

    Sadly, I think Hobbes is correct, though clearly he was writing in the abstract. While all people do have within them elements of both good and bad, as The Osmond Brothers said so succinctly in the 1970's, "one bad apple can spoil the whole darn bunch." Even if 99.99% of the population was good, pure, philanthropic, and just, it only takes one "evil" individual to upset everything. As Hobbes pointed out – everyone must make a singular commitment to have freedom from the natural condition.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Hobbes And Rousseau Analysis
    • 1774 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Hobbes And Rousseau Analysis

    Hobbes talks about his view of Human Nature in his book The Leviathan. His central belief was built around the idea that the nature of humanity leads people to seek power. He believed that humans naturally desired the power to live well, and that human beings will never be satisfied with the power they currently possess unless they acquire more power. Hobbes defined power as” the ability to…

    • 1774 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Locke vs Hobbes
    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Locke vs Hobbes

    On the other hand, Thomas Hobbes believed that humans were naturally evil. He thought the only way to control these naturally wicked people were to hold them under a strong government.…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Comparing Hobbes And Rousseau's Assumptions About Human Nature
    • 1384 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Comparing Hobbes And Rousseau's Assumptions About Human Nature

    Compare Hobbes’ and Rousseau’s assumptions about human nature. In each case what follows from these assumptions? Who do you agree with, and why?…

    • 1384 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Critique of Thomas Hobbes's Leviathan
    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Critique of Thomas Hobbes's Leviathan

    Hobbes begins his explanation of the state of nature in chapter 13 of “Leviathan” by stating that all men are equal in nature. Although one man may be stronger or more intelligent than another, humans are relatively equal in every way because of their ability to manipulate and form alliances: “For as to the strength of body, the weakest has strength enough to kill the strongest, either by secret machination, or by confederacy with others, that are in the same danger as himself.”1 Because men are all equal, Hobbes believed that they desire the same things. If two men share the same desire, they become enemies.…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Examples Of Bad Human Nature By Thomas Hobbes
    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Examples Of Bad Human Nature By Thomas Hobbes

    Thomas hobbes theory of human nature is proven by the hunger games , because of killing and the people's bad behavior. The annual hunger games are based off of bad human nature. In the book , the book quotes “ Taking the kids from our districts, forcing them to kill one another while we watch”. ( 1.76)…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Hobbes The Fool
    • 1772 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of Hobbes The Fool

    In Hobbes case, justice is characterized supporting a covenant, and for those who shatter their covenant will be penalized accordingly. The fool first expresses his assertion having “said in his heart: 'there is no such thing as justice'” (L p. I ch: xv [4]). If there are no covenants to be broken, this would signify neither just or unjust actions exist. The fool by rejecting the reality of fairness is rejecting the achievement of covenants in general, yet as we currently understand from our own know-how, the fool’s contention is unsound. In every day interactions persons manage in diverse examples support their covenants. Here, Hobbes makes the fool's place appear blatantly untrue for its conspicuous betrayal of the…

    • 1772 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Hobbes State Of Nature Argument
    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Thomas Hobbes State Of Nature Argument

    Hobbes’ writes that morality solves the issue of societies’ tendency of self-interest and is needed in order to promote a healthy, peaceful environment for all people (Rachels, 80). Hobbes’ believed that life in this manner would be short, hard, and nasty. He dreaded a life in which there would be “no industry, no society, no commodities, no letters, no arts, and no account of time” (Rachels, 81/Excerpt from The Leviathan). There are four basic facts about life which according to Hobbes’ would make life awful; they are the equality of need, scarcity, the essential equality of human power, and limited altruism (Rachels, 81). More specifically, these four facts highlight that all humans require the same basic things in order to survive such as food and shelter however the world is not equipped with the proper amount of these needed resources to supply all beings with and no one individual is entitled to a larger share of these goods than another human being because everyone is capable of being overpowered or outsmarted; lastly, this poses an issue because everyone will put the needs of themselves above others in times of conflict so all human beings must be able to stand up for themselves.…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Hobbes
    • 1332 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Thomas Hobbes

    Humanity, a big subject in Thomas Hobbes' philosophic thoughts on why humans are the way they are. Thomas Hobbes' perception on humanity is the most accurate out of the three philosophers. He believes all humans are self interested and selfish. Hobbes believed that all humans by nature are selfish, he calls this the state of nature. Though the idea may seem crass at first glance, you can see that it begins to grow more truthful as you become more aware of your actions and the reasons to why you act on anything. The idea that all humans are self interested can be seen in anything even in acts that would seem selfless could find its way back to the state of nature. This connects back to the idea of sovereignty, in were humans are always going…

    • 1332 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Leviathian
    • 345 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Leviathian

    The most important component of this reflection is Hobbes’ description of the “natural condition of mankind,” more commonly known as “the state of nature.” According to Hobbes, the human condition is naturally a state of war, a war of all against all, [each to their own, if you will]. He also believes in the circumstances where there is no common power to settle controversies, the natural human condition is, thus, one of “continual fear and danger of violent death” in which human life is “solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short.” Hobbes states, man is driven by competition for scarce resources, fear, and glory. More precisely, it is the natural conflict in the human heart and mind between glory or pride, and fear that brings people to reason and consequently to the discovery of the need to surrender their natural liberty to a sovereign power, the great “Leviathan,” Hebrew word for “sea monster” appearing in the Bible (Job 41:34); “king over all the sons of pride.”…

    • 345 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Selfishness Essay
    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Selfishness Essay

    There are a lot of people who agree Thomas Hobbes one of them is another philosopher with the name of Mary Wollstonecraft or Montesquieu “No man chooses evil because it is evil; he only mistakes it for happiness, the good he seeks.” This quote means exactly what is says that no man is born with evil but it is achieve their happiness evil is born. This is identical to Thomas Hobbes in the sense that they both have the same view on this subject and it resembles that everyone is out for their own happiness and couldn’t care about others.…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More