true.
It can’t possibly be true.”(p. 52) To conclude, not only do Nora’s secrets spur tension in her relationship, but Torvald stating his strong opinions on fraud only makes for a bigger fall when Nora must tell the
truth.
* Always a motive by Dan Ross shows the struggle of a man to prove his innocence despite strong evidence against him. The investigating officer does not understand him, and he is presumed guilty. The theme is portrayed that individuals may take surprising actions that are not known by others. This theme is effectively reviled through its characters, and title.…
In this essay I intend to explore the narrative conventions and values, which Oliver Smithfield presents in the short story Victim. The short story positions the reader to have negative and sympathetic opinion on the issues presented. Such as power, identity and bullying. For example Mickey the young boy is having issues facing his identity. It could be argued that finding your identity may have the individual stuck trying to fit in with upon two groups.…
Nora's epiphany occurs when the truth is finally revealed. As Torvald unleashes his revulsion against Nora and her crime of forgery, the protagonist realizes that her husband is not who she thought he was at all. Torvald has no intention of taking the blame for Nora's crime. She thought for certain that he would selflessly give up everything for her, like she given up so much for him. When he fails to do this, she accepts the fact that their marriage has been an illusion. In this moment Nora’s eyes and mind finally become clear of any delusions she once possessed. Nora was dominated and controlled by her father before marriage and afterwards it was her husband dominating her. Torvald never treated her as an equal. She had existed for her husband and she had always expected that her husband would come to her aid when she was in trouble. She had been waiting for miracles to happen. Nora feared that Krogstad would expose everything and that their family would come undone. Contrary to her expectation, Torvald behaved like a hypocrite concerned more with societies idea of morality and a notion of social prestige, not with his wife's welfare and care. He came out in his true colors. Nora realized that her husband didn't see her as an individual. She wanted to dissolve her ties with him by abandoning him and the children. She thought her duty toward herself was above her duty as a…
Ibsen uses the symbolism of nicknames to represent how Nora’s façade influences how Torvald treats her because her true personality is…
One evening whilst Torvald was away, Krogstad visits and has a chat with Nora. He tells her that if she didn’t convince Torvald to let him keep his job that he would blackmail Nora about the money she borrowed from him and forging her father’s signature on the contract for paying him back. Presenting that maybe…
In the short story “The Liar” by Tobias Wolff, an adolescent boy named James constantly…
In society everyone believes in what they are told, especially when told by someone of higher authority. Whether you’re a kid being told things by your parent, a teenager being told things by your teacher, or an adult being told things by your boss, people of all ages believe what they are told as long as the person saying the things sounds like they know what their talking about, and the more you are told these things which are ultimately “universal lies”, the more you start believing these things. We as a people believe these things so much that we just never question them, and for not questioning them, sooner or later we get blinded by these “universal lies” so much they replace the “plural truths”. In the book “Blindness” written by Jose…
At the start of the play, Nora seems humble and responds positively to her husband’s humor and lightheartedness. “[smiling quietly and happily] ‘You haven’t any idea how many expenses we skylarks and squirrels have, Torvald.’ ‘You are an odd little soul. Very like your father. You always find some new way of wheedling money out of me,”… (Ibsen, pg.8). Ibsen’s view of human life was much tilted toward men in this play and he did a good job making the wife very doll-like in her husband’s eye. “She is to live for his sake only, to have no other thought than of him, no feelings, no opinions, save those which are his” (Jaeger, Henrik Bernhard. Henrik Ibsen: A Critical Biography. Benjamin Blom, inc., New York 1972, pg 240). She is excited about all the money that Torvald’s new job will…
When Nora opens up about her secret to Mrs. Linde, she expresses to her, “I’ve got something to be proud of and happy for. I’m the one who saved Torvald’s life” (Isben 1716). Who wouldn’t want to have the opportunity to save their significant others life? Nora honestly felt like she had done the right thing for the man that she loved, even if it did mean having to go behind his back. When Nora is asked if Torvald knows she replies, “For heaven’s sake, no! Are you serious? He’s so strict on that subject” (Isben 1717). Nora explains that it would break up her happy beautiful home. This is a great example of the disrespect that Torvald shows Nora. She never felt comfortable telling him something so big, because she knew he would react horribly. Nora continues on and tells Mrs. Linde that she maybe could tell Torvald, “years from now, when I’m no longer attractive” (Isben 1717). This statement from Nora confirms that she really has no place in her marriage to say anything. The fact that she honestly believes that she should wait until Torvald isn’t as in love with her as he is now is ridiculous. No women should have to be so belittled to the fact that they are afraid to be honest.…
For Nora, the young beautiful wife of Torvald, money is her addiction. It serves as the driving force for her to break the law when her husband becomes ill. Her whole life is turns upside down when what she seeks most is money and can't get it without taking illegal actions. Without a signature from her father she can't take out money because she is a woman. In this situation, money helps bring up an important theme in this play which is woman’s roles. Nora, as well as other characters, use money to fulfill their needs and we as readers are able to see the relationships between men and women in the household when it is involved. So again the play is brought back to money and a man named Krogstad, who is shunned by sociaty, helps Nora out but this puts her in his debt. Through her constant begging for money from her husband, Nora's life also becomes a constant lying game. Even though Nora had taken odd jobs and worked part time as a copier, it was not enough. When Krogstad threatens to blackmail her by telling Torvald what she had done, Nora begins to panic. Nora is then forced to pay back Krogstad and we can see and feel her desperation to find common ground. She is torn between paying her dues for relief and letting Torvald find out what she has done so he can fix it and become furious with her.…
Nora’s final walk out from the house seems to be a selfish woman, but it was the example of power and strength of struggle women. Nora wasn’t agreed to live life with Torvalds’s condition. She argue that, “I believe that before all else, I’m a human being, no less than you-or anyway, I ought to try to become one (Ibsen 840).” Here, Ibsen clearly expresses the independent nature of women. Nora believes that women had a right to develop their own individuality, but in reality her role has been often self-sacrificial. She always been treated as a narrow house wife by Torvalds. She shows her eagerness, “you thought it fun to be in love with me, that’s all (Ibsen 838).”Her biggest discovery was to save her husband’s life, but she disappointed when it became an unforgivable crime in the eyes of her husband and society. At the last, she left her husband and children was begets action in her life as a feminist. The whole play based on the beginning of feminism in 19th centuries. Nora who always thought that she was nothing else than the entertainment of her husband transcend her into a independent woman was the most dramatic change on the…
These expectations are what caused a great deal of deception throughout the play. Nora had lied to Torvald about the macaroons because she wanted him to feel in control. If Nora told Torvald the truth, that she indeed had eating the macaroons, Torvald would of taken it as disrespectful and disobedient. This incident reflects another incident, when Nora takes a loan out from the bank, forges the signature on the paperwork, and keeps it a secret from Torvald. Nora’s intentions were to use the loan to help Torvald to pay medical treatments, but kept it a secret so she wouldn’t dishonor…
her money] Do you think I don 't know what a lot is wanted for…
Krogstad who used to work at the bank with Torvald, until he was let go and replaced by Mrs. Linden, Nora’s school friend. Nora took out a loan to take her husband out and with doing so she forged her dead father’s signature and Krogstad is now coming around to collect the debt. Since Nora has no money to pay off the debt, so Krogstad sends a letter to Torvald explain to him about the situation his wife is currently in. Once Torvald opens the letter he immediately runs over to Nora and demands an explanation from her doing. He is furious at the fact that she would do this behind his back, he does not try and see the reasoning behind doing that. Once Torvald is as his highest level of anger he raises his hand at Nora and slaps her, this is the turning point for both of them. Nora than begins to realize that this is not the life for her and has made the decision to leave the kids and Torvald to find herself. She no longer wants to be in a place where she is incapable of finding who she really is. Torvald realizes what he has done, and knows that the right way to fix something is to do it as a couple and not fight over something that is already said and…
Nora tells her friend Kristine, “…with all his masculine pride—how painfully humiliating for him if he ever found out he was in debt to me. That would just ruin our relationship. Our beautiful, happy home would never be the same” (Ibsen 794). A woman financially helping her husband us unacceptable, which restricts what women can and cannot do. Further into the conversation, Torvald proceeds to question Nora about whether or not she has had any macaroons today—she has had some even though he has asked her not to eat them because they are bad for her health—she replies, “You know I could never think of going against you” (Ibsen 788). It becomes clear early in the play that Nora is beneath Torvald in their relationship. Additionally, according to Toril Moi—a award winning literary critic— Torvald's control and Nora's thoughtlessness work together to theatricalize both themselves and each other in various idealist scenarios of female sacrifice and male rescue (Moi 257), which is a prime example of feminism and unjust gender roles. Moving forward to Act II, Nora is begging her husband to rehire Krogstad—an old friend of her husband that committed a forgery crime and is also the man Nora secretly took out her loan from—so he doesn’t tell her husband about the loan and her forgery. Torvald quickly becomes…