Preview

How Can the Different Ways of Knowing Help Us to Distinguish Between Something That Is True and Something That Is Believed to Be True?

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3693 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Can the Different Ways of Knowing Help Us to Distinguish Between Something That Is True and Something That Is Believed to Be True?
How can the different ways of knowing help us to distinguish between something that is true and something that is believed to be true?
By using different ways of knowing, we can distinguish between something that is true and something that is believed to be true. In order to express these distinctions, personal experiences, their implications, and their counterclaims are needed to be stated. For something to be “true” it must be public, eternal, and independent. If the “truth” does not follow these guidelines then it can not be “true.” The ways of knowing that something is “true” is comprehended by one’s own perception, language, reason and emotion. With these “ways of knowing” than the “truth” can, in theory, be understood.
Perception is one of the most broad and vague ways of knowing. It is hard for someone and another to have the same “perception” of an object or event. Take example that Jimmy, a young yet intellectual boy who wears glasses, has just seen the biggest bully Bob assault the youngest and smallest kid in school Fred. Their teacher comes over and asks the three boys what happened. According to Bob, Fred fell and received the bruises that way; Fred says that he was attacked by Bob; and Jimmy states that, due to his glasses fogging up, that Bob had inflicted the pain to himself. This vagueness is why the judicial system takes so much time to resolve problems between one party and another. This has implication due our ability to not ever “know” the whole “truth”. The cause of not “knowing,” due to inability to not see “everything,” leads to the effect of problems between us and our kin based solely on our perception of the events that took place. According to the definition of “truth” is that it must be public, eternal and independent and thus begins the problems of “knowing” between Jimmy, Bob, and Fred. The fact that there was a fight and Jimmy watch is public and everyone “knows” thus the first part of “truth” is correct. Eternal works as well due

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nt1310 Unit 1 Assignment

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages

    According to the standard account, true belief is not sufficient for knowledge. It states that knowledge requires, not only that our beliefs be true, but that we have good reasons for believing them to be true. In standard account, knowledge is justified true belief.…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    PHL 458 Week 1

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Truth is “the reality of the matter, as distinguished from what people wish so, believe to be son, or assert to be so” (Ruggiero, 2009). Truth is a fact. It does not change, only our knowledge change. Forming thoughts based on…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Phl458 Week 1

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Knowledge is what we know to be true, what we understand as fact about a subject. "We can obtain authentic knowledge in any one of three ways: personal experience, observation, and report from others" (Ruggiero, 2019, p. 30).…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many questions have been asked, and just as many answered, but never the question of the true…

    • 1496 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jasper Jones Essay Model

    • 1351 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Gaining knowledge of the truth often involves being confronted by both the darkness and the light within human nature. Knowing both these sides is what defines the adult mind from that of the child’s.…

    • 1351 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Knowledge is not the same as belief. Beliefs can be mistaken, but no-one can know what is false.…

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The truths are self evident, as we would follow them if there was no outside interference, it is a natural acceptance.…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Pezdek, K., Blandon-Gitlin, I., Lam, S., Hart, R. E., & Schooler, J. W. (2006). Is knowing believing?…

    • 4907 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Integrative Approaches

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The foundation of our worldviews is based on how we were brought up and the society we were raised in. Our worldviews affect everything, the way we live, the way we think and the way we react. This book helps us understand our worldview assumptions and provides a roadmap to determining what we base our assumptions on. We need to have an understanding of Psychology and Christianity if we want to effectively integrate the two. (Entwistle 2010) discusses epistemology, which is the study of knowledge and belief. Epistemology introduces 4 ways of knowing: Internal Dialogue, Interactive, Investigative and Interpreting God’s Word. Epistemology allows us to keep questioning that which we think we know.…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the first place, it is important to keep in mind that truth is an abstract concept, meant to disqualify lie and liars by approving or not a statement. But truth is also linked to reality in the sense of it is a conformity to a fact in which one should trust, it has to be seen to be believed. Finally, it is important to dicover the “true truth” about fact and fiction, between history and the story.…

    • 2900 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    What is truth? A simply complex question, truth is what we know, what we believe, or simply what is definite. I believe that we have personal truths that drive our beliefs, both of which are ever changing. In these changing truths, there is a common attribute: to further our truth is to strain our own being. For the betterment and continuity of human thought, we must undergo personal strains in the hope of going deeper into our changing beliefs. These strains are not all internal, for looking for truth is to subject ourselves to the possible maleficence of our own findings. The truth is a dangerous necessity.…

    • 1229 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    1. In Linda Zagzebski’s book on epistemology, she argues that one must care about having true beliefs, especially in topics that we care about. It is important to think critically when acquiring knowledge and one must be able to tell a true belief from a false belief. When addressing true belief, it is imperative to acknowledge skepticism. “Skepticism is often interpreted as a threat to knowledge” insofar as that most of the time, it is almost impossible to fully guarantee whether or not we are successful or fail at getting to the truth.…

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    How Do We Know What We Know

    • 2299 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The idea of “que sais-je?” which translates in English to “What do I know?” is a question that that originated from Michel De Montaigne. This question allows us to contemplate and question what we have learnt. Perhaps it is Montaigne’s experience as a statesman that has allowed himself to question the very foundations of human society or more notably laws and legislations as nothing is hardly ever seems obvious when it comes to deciding the punishment for a convicts. Works like such as Don Quixote written by Miguel Cervantes and Faust written by Johann Wolfgang von Goethe also questions the validity of social views and learning. By delving into Montaigne’s essay On Experience we also get glimpses of how the originator of this philosophical dilemma deals with the affirmation of knowledge. Even though the question of “que sais-je?” seems like a vast topic, the inherent human qualities, such as ambition, deduction and experience, that are discussed in these three works might be able to provide insight into this puzzling dilemma.…

    • 2299 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Deliberately Just

    • 2498 Words
    • 10 Pages

    What is the relation between truth and knowledge? An interconnection between truth and knowledge absolutely exist. When fact is discerned from fiction, truth is found. Judgement is salvaged through human experience; and is developed by asking questions. Inquires play a central role in learning, provide a starting point toward advanced cognition, and inquests lead to answers; revealing truth. The enlightnement human beings possess, are the foundation of belief. However, not all assumptions are just. Prejudices, superstitions, stereotypes, and delusions exist, clouding the difference between right and wrong; justice and injustice. In order for mankind to comprise a just society, people must actively rationalize all information received, afore acquiring an opinion. One way rational beliefs may be obtained, is through critical thinking. A criteria must be established to base conclusions. Convictions derived upon the five evidentiary forms abide a righteous foundation. The five evidentiary forms include One's intuition, an instinctive feeling that cannot be explained logically, Personal experience, day to day occurrences, Personal observation, a person whom actively takes note of something or someone, Official or public testimony, a spoken or written account of something that is recorded in an official or public forum, Confirmation by authority, occurs when an individual appears qualified or influential, and provides insight. These five evidentiary forms are used in everyday life, not only as an infrastructure of forming solid opinions, but in order to deduce right from wrong. These five evidentiary forms are extensively utilized In the short story The Blue Carbuncle, a mystery about a stolen jewel, and the the film Twelve Angry Men, an exploration of a diverse group of jurors whom set aside their own prejudices, and influenced one another to incur a just verdict. The stories Twelve Angry Men and The Blue Carbuncle demonstrate the idea, that one…

    • 2498 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Cave

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages

    How can one know the truth, if one doesn’t know what truth is. This may be contradicting but the real truth is what one knows to be true. In order to explain this concept better, let me use the analogy of the blind men trying to describe what an elephant looks like. Six blind men travel to go and see an elephant each man held a different part and the elephant and then describe to the others what an elephant look like. One of the men found the elephant’s leg and started to describe it as being round and rough like a tree. Another felt the tusk and described it as a spear. The third took held the…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics