Preview

How Did Alexander The Great Continue His Achievements

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
936 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Did Alexander The Great Continue His Achievements
War is believed by some to contribute towards economic growth. This may not be the case in todays world, however it was certainly the case during the era when Alexander the Great was ruling. Alexander reigned from 356 BCE until 323 BCE, during his short time on the throne, he excelled steadily and became one of the most significant figures studied from the ancient world (Lane Fox, p. 230, para. 2, p. 231, para. 1). Alexanders eagerness to continue his father's legacy as well as his own aspirations, and to continue his luxurious lifestyle are factors that contributed in motivating him to succeed and become the greatest military commander of all time. With war there has always been the prospect of obtaining land and new sources of precious metal, this was a large incentive to go to war in the ancient world (Lane Fox, p. 229, para 2). Secondly there was vast empires and lands available to explore and …show more content…
He wanted to do this by invading and leaving a trail through what was thought to be the known world. Lane Fox states, “The more a king conquered, the more secure his personal kingship became, and the more his resources for yet more conquest” (Lane Fox, p. 230, para. 1). This was true for Alexander, he had an uncanny hunger for conquest. He was able to persuade his army and cavalry to follow his pursuit until they reached territories unheard of to any of them. Alexander was forced to settle for his second best aspiration which was at the river Indus thought to be southern edge of the world, which is modern day Pakistan. It was at this point when Alexanders troops refused to go on due to the monsoon season and fear of an unknown Indian kingdom (Lane Fox, p. 231, para. 1). Although Alexander’s accomplishments were extraordinary and unmatched to this day, he had greater aspirations to continue his conquest and if it were not for his death he may have been capable of much

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Now, instead of simply discussing his most glorious battle and successful expansion of his empire by overthrowing the Persian Empire. And although they were a major success to his rising to power. People must be able to understand exactly how even after defeating his enemies, Alexander ran these new additions to his empire and effected them through cultural influence. While Alexander was exceedingly bright, some may have doubted how he chose to run them. Even after the overthrowing of Darius III, Alexander still wanted to add more to his empire. He even went as far as India to overthrow, which only failed due to homesick soldiers. Thus, this had to be Alexander's greatest flaw, he didn't know when enough was enough. Now, back to subject at…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    When Alexander marched on Asia, he had been king for less than two years; the army that crossed the Bosporus had been organized around the tactics used by Philip II over his nearly twenty year rule andAlexander did not have the time or ability to affect radical change on his own. Without the military tactics of Epaminondas and the reforms of his father, it would have been highly unlikely that Alexander could have achieved…

    • 1306 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander shows more signs of maturity as he travels through Asia into India, where he battles Porus with his fleet of Indian elephants, which Alexander’s horses were not used to. Although the battle between Alexander and Porus was long and hard fought, Alexander comes out victorious. But before that Alexander rides up to the dying Porus and asks what the defeated king wants. He answers that he wants to be treated as a king and Alexander proceeds to give Porus’ kingdom back. Although Alexander showed some sense of mercy all throughout his life, this part…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How Did Alexander Succeed

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Alexander achieved many things that would be considered unachievable by many in that era. However, with his achievements came mistakes, or as some might say a God like complex. No matter, whichever way you look at it, he succeeded where others failed. Alexander wanted to be greater than his father, and he certainly achieved this goal. However, Alexander had a different way of doing things, he did not want to just conquer lands and take over the inhabitant’s lifestyle, but instead he tried to teach them new ideas and a new way of living.…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After his victory Alexander entered the Persian capitols of Susa and Persepolis and plundered all of the gold and treasures of the city. Not satisfied with his victory over Persia, Alexander continued to pursue the Persian king Darius the third only to find that he had been killed by one of his own men. This lead Alexander to turn east to India. Exhausted and weary of yet another battle, Alexanders men mutinied against him and forced him to retreat from India. Alexander had created one the biggest empires the world has seen, but unable to leave an heir, it fell just as quickly as it rose after his death at the age of 32. Some speculated that fever or excessive alcohol consumption lead to his death, others believe that he was poisoned. Weather he had plans for a world empire are unknown, but in his fathers final wishes he reported to tell Alexander to " expand your empire for the one I left you is not enough." Was Alexander really great? Alexander was a self proclaimed decedent of the Gods, claiming that he was related to Hercules. He was known to murder close Friends and advisers if they opposed his wishes and had a ferocious temper. By the end of his reign, Alexander has slaughtered thousand whose only crime was…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the Roman empire had their wars it had always led to mass increase of the quality of life in Rome. Ian Morris says, “From Roman conquests to World Wars, Morris noticed a pattern: War improved the quality of life for both winner and loser, gradually making societies safer and richer. ”(Ian morris).Both winner and loser win which makes the societies safer. War also leads to wealthier economies in the aftermath.…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    At only 32 years old, Alexander had created the largest empire the world had seen. He conquered land ranging from Greece to Egypt, and from Egypt to Asia and Persia. At just 20 years old, Alexander received the throne from Philip. Soon after, he began to build his empire. Alexander was very proud of his accomplishments, as one would expect. After defeating his close friend Dareius in battle, Alexander boasted, “What, pray? Dost thou not think that we are already victorious, now that we are relieved from wandering a vast and desolate country in pursuit of a Dareius who avoids battle?” (Plutarch…

    • 1501 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Persian empire at its peak has long been seen as one of the largest wholes during the classical era, and few have rivaled its size. The land that Alexander the Great was able to conquer, however, was one of the few that served as an appropriate challenge. Around the time of 338 B.C.E through 323 B.C.E., Alexander's collected mass was a whole. Of a Greek origin, Alexander was taught by Aristotle, the great philosopher, and it can be inferred that he used the strategic methods learned, among other things, to assist him during his expansion. It was short lived, however, when he died of an unknown cause at an early age of thirty-three. Even though his empire crumbled, his legacy lived on. Multiple cities, strongly influenced by Alexander, erected,…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The reading “Alexander the Great” by J. Kelley Sowards it talks about how Alexander had a sense that he was meant for something greater than his life in Macedonia, as the son of a king her had the idea of manifest destiny which was said to explained his “instinct for the unusual, the cryptic, the dramatic in political and religious, as well as in strategic and military decisions.” (pg. 71 MWT) Though many studies and reading it is said that even though Alexander conquered much of his world, he did not complete his life long quest and visions of our world. Alexander believed that it was imperative to record his deeds so with in his ranks he had two scholars named Callisthenes and Aristobus which keep books or dairies about Alexander’s triumphs…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This allowed Alexander to conquer all other nations at will, and possess a huge empire. Alexander himself promoted a policy of Hellenization, Greek culture undoubtedly penetrated into western Asia as the result of his conquests, and western Asia, up to the Mesopotamian frontier, became for the first time a part of the Greek world. This is Alexander’s most certain, though unintended, historical…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    People believe that there is no benefit to war. Others believe that there is benefits to war. War is necessary and beneficial for many reasons, those reasons are; to maintain alliances, to make new allies, and to provide jobs.…

    • 112 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When King Phillip was assassinated, alexander took the responsibility to continued and carried out the first invasion in Asia. The reasons why alexander invaded Asia were as follows; to retaliate invasions of Greece, to establish an empire, to spread western Greek culture to the east. After annihilating the Persian army, returned to conquer the rest of Syria and Persia and killed the last Persian emperor, Darius III thus ending the Persian Empire. Longing for more worlds to conquer, alexander wanted to go beyond the Indus valley. But his troops mutinied and refused to go farther. They had been fighting for 10 years; they are tired and wanted to go home. Alexander returned to Babylon to devote his time in ruling, his empire his hectic life and hard military campaigns had sapped his energy. Then one morning, he developed high fever and could not be cured. Alexander died at his royal palace in Babylon at age of 33. As alexander was dying, his generals asked him to whom the empire would belong. He replied, to the strongest. He gave his ring to perdiccas, one of his generals. But perdiccas was not the strongest. Generals of alexander fought each other for many years that’s why the empire of alexander was broken up into three parts: the ptolemic kingdom of Egypt, the Seleucid Empire of Asia, the empire of Macedonia, all these fragments were conquered by Rome later on. The conquest of alexander and his generals had far-reaching…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander the great and Napoleon Bonaparte were two of the most prominent leaders from Greece and France respectively who were considered to be the greatest leaders even today. It would not have been possible for Alexander to capture the whole of middle east and India if he had wavered his objective based on opinions for expanding his empire. Even though there was a large opprobrium from Napoleon's people, his initiative and determination was the only reason for ruling the Europe continent. If the army of Napoleon had questioned his strategies and had qualms about the invasion, then it would have not been possible to…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the death of King Darius III, Alexander began to introduce his ‘Policy of Fusion’. He believed that if the two traditions (Macedonian and Persian) could be “blended and assimilated”, his authority would be more securely established and would rest on good will rather than on force, according to ancient historian Plutarch. This tell us that Alexander did not want to destroy the Persia that Darius and his ancestors had set up and replace it with a Macedonian ruling. Quoting Plutarch, “He understood that the sharing of race and customs is a great step towards the softening of men’s heart”. Alexander knew that if he were to change Persia to a Macedonian ruling, the Persians would not have obeyed nor trusted him. He instead opted to combine the Macedonian and Persian kingship, an act that he knew would gradually earn the trust of the Persians. He changed his lifestyle by adopting Persian customs.…

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    war

    • 1026 Words
    • 3 Pages

    War, in the broadest sense, is a violent contact of distinct but similar entities (Wright 3-6). Different people may have very different opinions towards war. To some people, war is a plague which ought to be eliminated or a mistake which should be avoided; to others, it is an anachronism which no longer servers any purpose. However, there are some who take a more receptive attitude toward war and regard it as an instrument which may be useful, and a procedure which may be legitimate and appropriate, or a condition of existence for which one must be prepared. That is to say, war, to some extent, is very helpful and necessary for human society development. This essay will explain the reasons why war is necessary in human society. In the first part, the technology reasons will be mentioned and in the next part, the system reform reasons will be taken into consideration. In the end, an conclusion will be given about whether war is necessary in human society.…

    • 1026 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays