Similarities Between Alexander The Great And Napoleon Bonaparte

I strongly believe in commitment towards a particular principle and objective rather than changing it according to the public opinion. From antediluvian times, there has been a lot of examples that prove that a consistency towards a goal rather than varying the goal based on opinions is more effective. Alexander the great and Napoleon Bonaparte's perseverance to capture the world, Gandhi's non-violence movement, and Abraham Lincoln's fight against slavery are few of the many examples to prove that consistent commitment is the necessary ingredient for success.

Alexander the great and Napoleon Bonaparte were two of the most prominent leaders from Greece and France respectively who were considered to be the greatest leaders even today. It would not have been possible for Alexander to capture the whole of middle east and India if he had wavered his objective based on opinions for expanding his empire. Even though there was a large opprobrium from Napoleon's people, his initiative and determination was the only reason for ruling the Europe continent. If the army of Napoleon had questioned his strategies and had qualms about the invasion, then it would have not been possible to
Only because his motives and idea behind satyagraha and non violence was believed by the whole nation was it possible for Gandhi to fight against Britishers. If the people in India had rejected Gandhi's principles, it would have been impossible for India achieve independence against ruling British. Gandhi's every principle was followed even though the effect of the principle was not immediate. The non-violence moment brought more harm than good to Indians but on a long term had a very positive effect and was one of the key to India's independence. The determination towards adhering to a particular principle made Gandhi the father of Indian nation and India free from external