How Did Citizen Kane Change The Film Industry
Citizen Kane is a brilliant piece that changed the film industry, illustrated the American dream, and accurately lampoons the life of William Randolph Hearst. Citizen Kane was produced, directed, co-written, and acted out by Orson Welles in 1941, by Radio-Keith-Orpheum (RKO) studios . The movie appears to be unanimously popular both in the day it was produced and even more so today. The film techniques used were due to the fact that Welles was an amateur, and his camera man was adventurous.
Citizen Kane is a fascinating movie that saddens the heart. Orson Welles plays the lead role of Charles Foster Kane, a newspaper tycoon renowned for his yellow journalism. Citizen Kane does not follow the standard plot trajectory of a film. The story is told by Jerry Thomson who is a news reporter charged with the assignment of discovering the meaning behind Kane’s last word “Rosebud”. The story uses an alternate storyline as a vehicle to explore the main story. Thomson has no bearing on the story; we know nothing about him, yet he drives the story along. The story of Kane is told by the accounts of the people who knew him. The story is not in chronological order but is layered by the memories of the various characters. Charles Foster Kane inherits a fortune, becomes a newspaper tycoon, tries his hand at politics, fails …show more content…
Certain elements of it have not changed much which gives appeal to modern audiences. Welles says in the 1960 interview mentioned earlier, that he admits that the movie was a kind of social message against property and the acquisition of property. Welles mentions that Citizen Kane is banned in the Soviet Union perhaps because of its capitalist message. Welles remarks that he loves the Hollywood community , but in an interview twenty-five years later he says he hates Hollywood. He says he never should have stayed because if Hollywood doesn’t like you then you can’t get
Citizen Kane is a fascinating movie that saddens the heart. Orson Welles plays the lead role of Charles Foster Kane, a newspaper tycoon renowned for his yellow journalism. Citizen Kane does not follow the standard plot trajectory of a film. The story is told by Jerry Thomson who is a news reporter charged with the assignment of discovering the meaning behind Kane’s last word “Rosebud”. The story uses an alternate storyline as a vehicle to explore the main story. Thomson has no bearing on the story; we know nothing about him, yet he drives the story along. The story of Kane is told by the accounts of the people who knew him. The story is not in chronological order but is layered by the memories of the various characters. Charles Foster Kane inherits a fortune, becomes a newspaper tycoon, tries his hand at politics, fails …show more content…
Certain elements of it have not changed much which gives appeal to modern audiences. Welles says in the 1960 interview mentioned earlier, that he admits that the movie was a kind of social message against property and the acquisition of property. Welles mentions that Citizen Kane is banned in the Soviet Union perhaps because of its capitalist message. Welles remarks that he loves the Hollywood community , but in an interview twenty-five years later he says he hates Hollywood. He says he never should have stayed because if Hollywood doesn’t like you then you can’t get