Preview

How Did His Act Breach The Fiduciary Duty Of Loyalty To The Company

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
145 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Did His Act Breach The Fiduciary Duty Of Loyalty To The Company
Issue: Without informing Loft, Inc.’s board, Guth set up a new corporation to obtain the secret syrup and formula of Pepsi Cola. Did his act breach the fiduciary duty of loyalty to the company?

Rule: Corporate officers and directors are not allowed to use their power to advance their own interests.

Application: The new corporation, which contained Pepsi Cola’s secret formula and trademark should belong to Loft Inc., not to Guth personally. Guth must be loyal to his corporation, which was Loft Inc., and prevent any conflict between his duty and his self-interest to Loft Inc. However, he failed to offer the new corporation to Loft Inc., and appropriated it for himself.

Conclusion: Without informing Loft, Inc.’s board, Guth set up a new corporation

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Did Win breach his fiduciary duty to Hailey? Fiduciary Duty Cal Family Code § 721 A husband and wife owe to each other a duty of highest good faith and fair dealing, and neither shall take any unfair advantage of the other. The duty is including but not limited to, providing each spouse access to records regarding transactions and accounting information, concerning the community property.…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mebel Doran & Company

    • 801 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The CEO of Mebel Doran & Company, Harvey Hegarty found out the M&A group of his Company had consulted the arbitrage desk about few specifics of Knox Corporation. The M&A and the arbitrage group would consult each other at times in order to structure effective financial strategies for the client, however, when inquired with the arbitrage group, the CEO found out that the arbitrageurs within the Company used to be in touch with other arbitragers in the market for information on any deals happening in the market, had got an enquiry about the Power Tie Corporation deal, which wasn’t handled well by the…

    • 801 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    12) Which of the following is likely to be a breach of a corporate officerТs or directorТs duty of care?…

    • 707 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    In Bezirdjian v. O’Reilly, the plaintiff (Bezirdjian) files a shareholder derivative complaint on behalf of Chevron Corporation citing that current and certain former member of Board of Directors (BOD) breached fiduciary duties, grossly managed the corporation, were involved in constructive fraud, and wasted corporate assets “in connection with illicit payments Chevron allegedly made to Saddam Hussein in exchange for Iraqi oil from 2000 to 2003.” Bezirdjian has a legal right to bring an action against the alleged party because he believes that harm has been done to Chevron in connection to illicit payments made to Saddam Hussein but the corporation itself has not taken any action against the offenders.…

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Tony Cupertino faces ethical and legal responsibilities as a CPA and CIA. Tony Cupertino must decide whether he report the concerns to the chief financial officer or the audit committee. As the CIA, Tony must uphold the values set forth in the IIA Code of Ethics. Tony must maintain his objectivity and independence from management. The audit committee is responsible for the oversight of the financial statements. As an internal auditor, Tony can address his concerns directly to the audit committee and the audit committee will resolve differences with management. Although Tony’s boss Walter is the chief financial officer and sits on the board of directors, Tony does have the option of reporting the issue to Walter. As a board member it is Walter’s responsibility to safeguard corporate assets and make decisions in the best interest of the shareholders. The…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case 3-3 at the end of Chapter Three of Ethical Obligations and Decision Making in Accounting provides an example of how legal and ethical issues affect corporate governance. Examining the legality, Sarbanes-Oxley Act, and ethicality of the activities of this case will ensure the activities of United Thermostatic Controls are equitable to internal and external stakeholders. Corporate governance is in place, as proof by the internal auditor discovering the questionable transactions.…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Facts of the Case: Micro Enhancement International (MEI) was a software development company that was on the about to have an IPO. They hired Coopers and Lybrand as the auditor. The IPO for MEI was delayed because Coopers and Lybrand were resisting some of MEI’s recognized revenue and were threating to add a “going concern” to the audit. In the end Coopers and Lybrand allowed MEI to recognize the revenue and took away the “going concern” qualification. By the time the issue was settled MEI had lost the underwriter for the IPO and then went bankrupt shortly after. MEI sued Coopers and Lybrand for multiple things, but then wanted to add a breach of fiduciary duty. MEI’s CEO Staples said that, “he trusted Coopers and that Coopers had agreed to do the audit to do the Audit and to serve as MEI’s business advisor…” The judge denied this request and MEI appealed.…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Steeby vs Fial

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Fial asserted that the clients should be assigned based on who brought them into the business. Fial formed a new business called Audit Consultants of Colorado, Inc. He then terminated the original partnership’s contracts with many clients and put them under contract with his new firm. Fial also terminated the partnership’s contracts with the independent-contractor auditors and signed many of these auditors with his new firm. The partnership terminated about 11 months after Fial wrote the letter to Steeby. Steeby brought an action against Fial, alleging breach of fiduciary duty and seeking a final accounting. Who wins? Steeby v. Fial, 765 P.2d 1081, Web 1988 Colo.App. Lexis 409 (Court of Appeals of Colorado)…

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Asic

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages

    4 HIHC made an undocumented $10 million payment to a company controlled by Adler, PEE. Around the time of the payment, PEE became a trustee of a unit trust controlled by the Adler Corporation and two others. Units in the Trust were issued to HIHC at a price of $10 million. Adler Corporation had an existing entitlement to 10% of the Trust’s distributable income, while HIHC acquired a 90% entitlement. The $10 million payment was made in a way to ensure it would not come to the attention of the directors of HIH, apart from Adler, Williams and to a lesser degree Fodera. Using the $10 million payment shares in HIH were then purchased over two weeks. The stock market was given the impression that the purchase of shares were made by Adler or family interests associated with Adler. A further part of the $10 million payment was used to purchase various venture capital unlisted investments from Adler Corporation at cost. It was contended that Mr Adler breached his duties as a director or officer of HIH or HIHC under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Act). ASIC sought declarations that various alleged contraventions of the Act had been committed by the three personal defendants. Mr Adler was a non-executive director of HIH. Mr Adler was sued as a non-executive director of HIH and as an alleged officer (non-executive) of its wholly owned subsidiary HIHC. Mr Adler denied he was a director or officer of HIHC. ASIC relied on evidence that as a director of HIH, HIHC’s holding company, Mr Adler was a person who ‘participated in the making of decisions that affected the whole or a substantial party of the business of HIHC’. ASIC also stated that Mr Adler’s participation in investment decisions fell within the category of decisions…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Elliot, Chloe and Raj have breach their duties of care, diligence and skill as directors of De-Caffeine Delights because of not reading carefully financial report under section 180(1). They have also taken responsible for not preparing and maintaining financial statements under section (286). In addition, they have breached section 187 about director’s duties on wholly-owned subsidiary.…

    • 1628 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Berk's Duty Of Loyalty

    • 154 Words
    • 1 Page

    The legal issue in this case is whether Berk breached his duty of loyalty to the company. The rule of law is that directors and officers have not to act adversely to the interests of the corporation and to subordinate their personal interests to those of the corporation and its shareholders. Berk was vice president of Comedy Cottage, Inc. Berk usurped a corporate opportunity when he arranged for the Comedy Cottage’s lease to be drawn in his name. He then used his former position to retain the lease and opened his own Comedy Club. This new club was in direct competition with his old corporation. Because of these two actions, the court held that Berk had breached his duty of loyalty to the Comedy Cottage.…

    • 154 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Business Law

    • 2996 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The shareholders of Underwater Leagues, Inc. bring a derivative action suit against Aquaman claiming breach of fiduciary duty for violating 17 C.F.R. §240.10b-5 of the Securities and Exchange Commission Act of 1934 by purchasing stock in his company on the basis of information that was not available to the public. The shareholders seek remedy for their claim.…

    • 2996 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    For instance John has been driving while being intoxicated and gets caught up for breaking the signal. A search conducted by the police finds illegal handgun being present in the car’s trunk and an 8 bags of heroin being present in the compartment. The compartment is considered to be in the reach…

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Nbc Universal Swot Analysis

    • 4634 Words
    • 13 Pages

    CERTIFICATION OF AUTHORSHIP: I certify that I am the author of this paper and that any assistance I received in its preparation is fully acknowledged and disclosed in the paper. I have also cited any sources from which I used data, ideas or words, either quoted directly or paraphrased. I also certify that this paper was prepared by me specifically for this course.…

    • 4634 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Outsourcing with Nike

    • 2208 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Investigation on outsourcing within business. The outsourcing of trainer companies within developing countries with particular emphasis on Nike outsourcing history.…

    • 2208 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays