Preview

How Did Robespierre Influence The Cult Of France

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1578 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Did Robespierre Influence The Cult Of France
Robespierre was a leader to fear. 300,000 arrested and awaiting execution for having an opinion differing from him. 17,000 people beheaded in one year for disagreeing with him. He even founded a cult revolving around him as a god for all of France to worship. He did all this in only one year. How did this happen? Before 1789, France was at its lowest point in history and desperately searched for relief. There were famines everywhere, and the financial situation was abysmal. In 1792, a seemingly charismatic speaker known as Maximilien de Robespierre appeared the to be the answer for the French. Unfortunately, Robespierre and his Committee of Public Safety led France into even more bloodshed in trying to purge out any potential resistance to …show more content…
While technically speaking, the Committee of Public Safety was the governing force of France. Robespierre used the Committee as a way to make himself seem like he wasn’t the only controlling force. Dictatorships historically have resulted in abuse of power. Germany’s Adolf Hitler used his power in trying to create the Aryan race and thus carried out mass anti-Semitic genocide. The Soviet Union under the rule of Joseph Stalin lost millions due to famines and purging. Kim Jong Un’s North Korea is faced with corruption and public disarray due to the cult of personality that Un carries. When too much power is placed in the hands of an individual, there is a strong potential for that individual to misuse it. Some of the darkest moments in history are evidence of that idea; the Terror, the Holocaust, Salem Witch Trials, etc. While Robespierre was a deplorable person, he was intelligent. His famous quote: “the secret to freedom is educating the people whereas the secret to tyranny is in keeping them ignorant” demonstrates what he did. Robespierre was a highly educated person and used that to his advantage in keeping his people ignorant. He kept his people ignorant of his dictatorship and fooled them by proclaiming that he was fighting in favor of freedom. In reality, he had total power and condemned freedom. He made himself into a god to be worshipped and adored by his people, turning them into obedient slaves and destroying those who opposed …show more content…
While he initially rose to power via his ideals of liberalism and humanism, once in power he focused on nothing but progressing his radicalism and creating a cult. Ironically, before his rise to power, his ideas, as well as his opposition to the death penalty led to his nickname, “The Incorruptible.”Robespierre wanted to create a world of his own. He strongly despised the papacy as well as the Catholic church. To combat the church, he created his own cult revolving around himself as a way to change his people’s religious beliefs. Essentially, he utilized religion as a way to further manipulate his people by tapping into their beliefs and creating blind faith with him as their

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    RadioShack is one of the largest electronic chain stores across America. They employ up to 34,000 employees and according to their corporate website (www.radidoschack.com) they offer the “Complete Package : Incredible work environment, highly qualified employees and competitive compensation , including upon hire: paid time off , merchandise and wireless discounts, credit union, career progression , continued learning and development , educational discounts ,401(k) Plan. Medical, Dental and Vision Plans Flexible Spending Accounts, Life/AD&D Insurance, Short and Long Term Disability. This all sounds great, they offer things we all look for in an employer ; a competitive compensation and perks. So how does this huge corporation become rated number 3 top worst places to work for?…

    • 345 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    to be specific Robespierre wanted to protect the Revolution because he was the main figure of the French Revolution.Also,he supported the Revolution because he didn`t wanted the slavery ends.But,though the time his voice itself was weak and did not carry well outside or in large halls.…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reign Of Terror Dbq

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Reign Of Terror was an unjustified part of the French Revolution. These hateful and vengeful acts led to an outburst of fear amongst the french people. What once started as a start to a new government led to an unexpected ruling of Maximilien Robespierre. Robespierre was the leader of the Public Safety Committee, and the reason king Louis XVI and many others were executed. He wanted to lead the french people to victory during this revolution, but the power corrupted him. Thus leading to the reign of terror and later his own death by the people.…

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He believed France could achieve a “republic of virtue” only through the use of terror. Robespierre was on the chief architects of the Reign of Terror, which lasted from September 1793 to July 1794. In order to try to bring about this change in government, revolutionary courts conducted hasty trials. Robespierre explained that terror was necessary to achieve the goals of the revolution. During the Reign of Terror, about 300,000 people were arrested and seventeen thousand were executed, all suspected of resisting the revolution.…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Napoleon Bonaparte DBQ

    • 614 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The ideals of the French Revolution were "Equality, Liberty, and Fraternity," but the methods that were used to fulfill these goals were complicated. During the Reign of Terror, about 40,000 people were guillotined because of Maximilien Robespierre. He thought that “Liberty could not be secured unless criminals lose their heads”. Napoleon Bonaparte, a Revolutionary hero, seized control of the government in France in 1799, he was looking to bring peace to the French people by ending the Revolution. For this to be done, he had to be in complete control like a monarch or a dictator. However, the French people still wanted to have some of the privileges they had during the Revolution. Napoleon Bonaparte stabilized and united French society, yet supported the ideals of French Revolution.…

    • 614 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reign Of Terror DBQ

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Reign of Terror was unjustified because their punishments were inhumane. Even the littlest thing could get you to be killed. If someone didn’t like you or suspected something bad about you, it could get you killed. Many politicians didn’t agree with the ideas of Robespierre, so he had them be decapitated. The town of Lyons didn’t approve of the National Convention’s authority so “revolutionaries destroyed 1600 homes and chopped off 12 heads in five minutes (Doc.C).” It was a cruel way for Robespierre to get rid of them. The reign of Terror also took away the people's freedom. The people couldn’t really do anything without being watched or suspected of doing something against the government.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The French Revolution was all about making a new government that allowed people to have freedom. The Reign of Terror was not justified because the methods were too harsh, human rights were invaded, and when Robespierre died so did all his accomplishments. The methods in 1789 were too harsh. An estimated 35,000-40,000 of people were killed, publicly beheaded, and smothered or perished for their beliefs.…

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “In the early stages, the revolution spurred men and women to great flights of enthusiastic idealism, but it also generated enormous anxiety and mistrust.” (Bell - Terror at the Dawn of Modern Europe ). This quote proved to be very true during the French revolution. People across the nation were swept by a fear that they would be incarcerated or get killed for unlawful actions. The implemented fear upon the people is a form of terrorism. Terrorism in itself does not have to be an act taken upon a person but it is inflicting fear upon a group for your own gain. With the people of France scared and afraid of anything Robespierre could have done they began to obey him and respect him out of fear. Robespierre most likely took after Machiavelli’s style of leadership. Machiavelli emphasized the importance of being respected not through love but rather through fear and Robespierre was able to put that style of leadership to use and did it very well. Leaders all throughout the world have been influenced by Robespierre’s inherited style of leadership, one leader in particular is Bashar al-Assad. Bashar al-Assad has been the president of Syria since 2000 and his reign of power has been anything but kind to the people of Syria. Bashar’s leadership style which reflects the one of which Robespierre had, kept the people he ruled over in constant fear. The people of Syria have been…

    • 1794 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Both characters are heroes in different ways, and they have many differences. Nick was seen as a hero because he could comprehend that all things come to an end. This makes him more humble, selflessHe was more laid back and tried to help his friends and had a good time before reality hit him. Santiago on the other hand, overcame his struggle even though he lost his fish, and had someone look up to him. He was a good role model which gave him his hero status.…

    • 142 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    King Louis XVI took power when his father, who was the previous ruler, died. Many people did not agree with this because he as a young man at the time and had no experience running a country. King Louis XVI enjoyed the riches that came with being King but he did not have any experience and made random decisions that hurt the common people of the country which made France a target for other countries. King Louis XVI did not know what he was doing, obviously, but he controlled everything. The French people had no say in how their country was ran because the King paid no attention to them. France wanted him executed. Document F shows an image of when King Louis XVI was killed by the guillotine. The image also shows Maximilien Robespierre, another inspiring figure of the American Revolution, holding the king’s head while everybody else was happy and laughing as it was an enjoyable event. This event happened on January 21, 1793 long after King Louis XVI started ruling, so France was still incredibly poor.…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, he also had radical ideas that were appalling and that weren't necessarily correct. In his opinion, the people should be lead by reason and the people's enemies by terror. Robespierre also mentions that a popular government in revolution evolves from virtue and terror. This is his outlook on virtue and terror: "virtue, without terror is fatal; terror, without which virtue is powerless." He says, "the characteristic of popular government is confidence in the people and severity towards itself." In other words, the popular government has to have confidence in the people and be strict and severe with itself. According to him, terror is the principle of despotic government and he thinks that because of this, the despot may govern by terror his brutalized subjects and subdue by terror the enemies of liberty. Even though these are only his opinions, his perspectives on the use of terror and ruthlessness led him to cause the Reign of Terror and ultimately led him to his execution on July 28, 1794. A revolution doesn't necessarily have to include terror and the popular government does not have to be ruthless to its people, because then the revolutionaries may lose their supporters (or they may even revolt) and the radicals might have to face more…

    • 366 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reign of Terror Essay

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages

    At the start of the French Revolution in 1789, the revolutionaries who felt the monarchy was tyrannical exclaimed the timeless words of Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity. It was on these tenets that the revolution began and ironically only four years later a man of great strength would take control of France and begin the Reign of Terror, this man was Maximilien Robespierre. Robespierre was the mastermind of the Reign of Terror. He was the leader of the Committee of Public Safety, the executive committee of the National Convention, and the most powerful man in France (“History Wiz”). To avert the possibility of a counter-revolution, the guards would send people to the guillotines with no remorse. Evidence was rarely needed to prove that the citizen was against the revolution; suspicion was enough to classify someone as the enemy. Robespierre prospered with the help of the Jacobins, who were the most radical and ruthless of the political groups formed in the wake of the French Revolution.…

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the article “Robespierre and the Terror” by Marisa Linton, Maximilien Robespierre is foremost depicted as a heartless monster that terrorized the people of France during the 1790’s. The article states facts about Robespierre starting with his birth in 1758, his “Reign of Terror” and ultimately ends with his death by beheading. Though Robespierre was an active revolutionary that represent common people, his radical ideas and hofficic actions inevitably scarred France’s history so he will forever be an infamous figure. Towards the end of the article, however, Linton sheds light on the idea that one person, by themselves, is not capable of this destruction; rather the people in their entirety are to blame. Instead of accepting the anarchy they…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Maximilien Robespierre states, “What is the goal toward which we are heading? The peaceful enjoyment of liberty and equality.” (Bienvenu, p. 1, para.1) The laws that have been passed by the royalty that are meant to bring long lasting righteousness, are laws that are recognized; these laws are not written any where but in the essence of all individuals. Robespierre was elected as the representative of the National Convention and joined a political club called the radical Jacobin party. Being apart of the Convention and the Jacobins, Robespierre took over the administrative power of the Republic. Because the Jacobins believed that France was in need of change and restructuring, and Robespierre was now the head of the Convention, he can develop such change. By doing so he argues that in the land, the use of ethics must be replaced with the use of pride, proposition for traditions, self-regard for arrogance, magnificence for narcissism, prestige for money, and immorality of the sovereign for virtues and the phenomenon. He believed in democracy and the Republic of virtue. He felt that in order to set the basis of democracy within the people, the merge of both ending the war of independence and oppression must take place in order to put an end to the revolt. The essences of the Republic are virtue and equality. He explains how it is the development of virtue and the maintenance of equality that creates the Republic. Therefore, it is embraced or founded by an individual. He believed that the quality of being an admired government would be an advantage in gaining the trust of the citizens in order to create a strict and rigorous government, “…be trustful towards the people and severe towards itself.” (Bienvenu, p. 2, para. 2) Robespierre states the strengths and weaknesses of this theory: the strength being the triumph of truth rather than dishonesty, and the rights of the community’s interests than the private. The purpose…

    • 941 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    chemistry and society

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages

    According to the Merriam-Webster Dictionary, accuracy is “freedom from mistake or error: the quality or state of being accurate: the ability to work or perform without making mistakes” ("accuracy," 2014). Precision, however, is “the quality of being precise” ("precision," 2014). That doesn’t really help with the definition much. After subsequently checking the definition for precise it means to be “very careful and exact about the details of something” ("precise," 2014). The most notable difference in the definitions of these two words, according to the dictionary, is that to be accurate it is not necessary to be careful about the details of something as it is to be precise. This seemed to be a bit confusing until it is realized that it is possible to perform without making mistakes while estimating measurements accurately. However, to be precise takes a bit more discipline and a desire to perfect what is being measured with exactness.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays