Preview

How Did the Culture of Nasa & Morton Thiokol Contribute to the Development of Group Think

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1146 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Did the Culture of Nasa & Morton Thiokol Contribute to the Development of Group Think
How did the culture of NASA and Morton Thiokol contribute to the development of group think?
In his book, Vital Lies, Simple Truths, The Psychology of Self-Deception, Dan Goleman cites a passage credited to Irving Janis. The passage cited is: The leader does not deliberately try to get the group to tell him what he wants to hear … nevertheless, subtle constraints, which the leader may force inadvertently, prevent a member from fully exercising his critical powers and from openly expressing doubts when most others in the group appear to have reached consensus.(Goleman, 1985, p. 181)
Janis points out that a leader may unknowingly constrain group. Group-think is a natural outcome when faced with pressure from above. Is it possible that some of these subtle constraints also existed at NASA resulting in group-think? With the Challenger explosion, one has to look at some of the key reasons that led to the disaster. As documented by the commission, there was not necessarily conflict at NASA or at Morton Thiokol, but more a hesitancy to “raise a red flag.” Questions were raised, but the flag was not waved high enough. During the course of the investigation, it was discovered that NASA and Morton Thiokol had vigorously debated the wisdom of operating the shuttle in the cold temperatures predicted for the next day. The investigation also revealed a NASA culture that gradually began to accept escalating risk, and a safety program that was largely silent and ineffective (CAIB, 2003, p. 25). The argument between Morton Thiokol and NASA regarding launch-time temperatures should have resulted in an investigation. It appears the decision to launch in colder temperatures was brought about by feelings of invulnerability due to the success of the Apollo program, as well as the fact they had flown previously in somewhat similar conditions. NASA management still pushed to meet its schedule, and subconsciously relegated safety and quality to a minor role. During the per flight

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Callaway , M. R. , & Esser, J. K. . (1984). Groupthink: effects of cohesiveness and problem-solving procedures on group decision making. Social Behavior and Personality, 12(2), 157-164.…

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Apollo 13 Notes

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the move Apollo 13 the stages of group development can be seen in the relationships with the Astronauts Lovell, Haise, Mattingly and Swigert. When we first see the Astronauts they are a well-oiled machine. They know each other’s movements and they can predict what one another is going to do next. The Astronauts are confident in each other which make them more confident in the success of their mission.…

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Group decision making can be very helpful in getting different thoughts and opinions out of discussion, but also can be dangerous because of groupthink. Groupthink occurs when people avoid individually testing, analyzing, and evaluating facts in order to avoid upsetting the consensus of a group. In effect a conflict occurs whereby some topics are okay to discuss while others are closed often without the group being consciously aware of it. Those who violate the unspoken rules often find themselves being ostracized, alienated and ultimately expelled from the group.…

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “Opinions and Social Pressure” by Solomon E. Asch, he claims that under group pressure, a subject 75% out of 123 participants agreed with the majority of the group. Asch demonstrated an experiment of 8 college student males for a psychological experiment on comparing the length of lines. He orchestrated everyone except 1 person to purposely answer the questions incorrectly, to see if that 1 person would continue independently with the correct answer or agree with the majority of the group. At the conclusion of Asch’s experiment, he was left wondering why do individuals conform to what their peers express instead of standing firm. Asch’s main idea of individuals converting their answers to a groups answers based on either the subjects believed…

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    W4A1

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages

    During Arch’s research there were seven people that were involved in a visual test. Six people knew about the test and one had no clue that he was the actual subject. When they were conducting the visual experiment on the first and second tests, all of the people where on an agreement. On the last experiment the actual subject was in a disagreement with the others but agreed with to others to avoid ridicule or ostracism (Kendall, 2012 p. 167). People will just agree in a group just to fit in and go with the flow.…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to study.com website (2015), a groupthink can simply be defined as an occurrence that gives a group of people a fault verdict or a conclusion a that a group has made that is an ineffective decision whereby it was reached just to appease the spirit of harmony among group members than allowing individuals to act independently and creatively. As alluded on, groupthink blocks individual creativity by ignoring alternatives allowing irrational actions to tale precedence. It happens most when individuals have similar background and the group is refusing external opinions. The result are that the decisions are flawed and they often come at a cost.…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Group norms can affect the development of a team When individuals are in groups there are forces at work that shape their behavior. All individuals have their own separate traits, way of thinking and doing tasks, however when they are contributing together as a team they enviably start to exhibit different behaviors which are based on the group norms. For example a team member may not be a brave outspoken individual on their own but when in a group may exhibit more aggressive outspoken tones feeling they are stronger united so to speak as they are trying to fit in as individuals we become influence by others whether this is consciously or subconsciously done this can cause conflict within a team environment. In most team dynamics especially…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Culture of Nasa

    • 1150 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Using the competing values framework, the type of organization culture represented by NASA is labeled as a market culture. According to the competing values framework, the culture of an organization can be identified by two different sets of values. One is that of flexibility and discretion versus stability and control. The other identifies the focus on internal affairs as opposed to the external environment. NASA can be identified as a market culture because it has an interest in stability and control yet is heavily influences by its external environment. This interest in stability and control for the NASA organization has come under a great deal of scrutiny since the Columbia Disaster. James Oberg wrote, "experienced space workers, both those still inside the program as well as retired, say this widespread attitude of being too smart to need outside advice has created a culture resistant to outside advice and experience. He went on to clarify that "most workers at NASA have only worked at NASA since graduation." And "the culture can also be powerful because it is so pervasive, since it is rarely exposed to outside influences." These comments illustrate the need for stability and control within NASA. Of course, NASA is a government-funded agency, which is, where the external environment gets involved…

    • 1150 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    303q

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1) “Leaders inhabit a bubble of power, and they are both mentally and physically cut off from the reality most people would recognize. In the context of this article, “the reality most people would recognize” is the imperative, if they witness improper or unlawful behaviour, to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. This author explains why leaders resist the imperative and how they – and we – can avoid the temptation.” (abstract to article)…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Group Minds

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Group Minds is a very interesting and informative piece. Author Doris Lessing does a very good job trying to inform people about what is wrong with groups changing your opinion, and the idea that we do not use the information we have to improve ourselves. She offers a lot of good information, including an experiment that adds to her opinion about social groups.…

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Groupthink Analysis

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Superficially the ideas promoted through groupthink often result in decisions appearing well founded and heavily supported, however the outcomes of such decisions are most frequently detrimental. Factors of cognitive dissonance are quite often evident in members of groupthink decisions, with individuals finding in reflection that they generally possessed ideas starkly contrasting the concepts which they just publically supported. Such incongruity in beliefs and decisions according to Hackman and Johnson arise when groups “put unanimous agreement above all other considerations” (Hackman Johnson 214). Personally through my participation in my local caving club, the Paha Sapa Grotto, I have witnessed and fallen victim to groupthink, the ramifications of which are still negatively effecting the grotto today.…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Weick E.K. and Roberts K.H., 1993, Collective Mind in Organizations: Heedful Interrelating on Flight Decks;…

    • 627 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Abilene Paradox Summary

    • 4895 Words
    • 20 Pages

    Organization members agree privately, as individuals, as to the nature of the situation or problem facing the organization. For example, members of the Abilene group agreed that they were enjoying themselves sitting in front of the fan, sipping lemonade, and playing dominoes. 2. Organization members agree privately, as individuals, as to the steps that would be required to cope with the situation or problem they face. For members of the Abilene group “more of the same” was a solution that would have adequately satisfied their individual and collective desires. 3. Organization members fail to accurately communicate their desires and/or beliefs to one another. In fact, they do just the opposite and thereby lead one another into misperceiving the collective reality. Each member of the Abilene group, for example, communicated inaccurate data to other members of the organization. The data, in effect, said, “Yeah, it’s a great idea. Let’s go to Abilene,” when in reality members of the organization individually and collectively preferred to stay in Coleman. 4. With such invalid and inaccurate information, organization members make collective decisions that lead them to take actions contrary to what they want to do, and thereby arrive at results that are counterproductive to the organization’s intent and purposes. Thus, the Abilene group went to Abilene when it preferred to do something else. 5. As a result of taking actions that are counterproductive, organization members…

    • 4895 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first part of the article begins by explaining how within the public and even within groups all sets of views or values are not universal. This means that it is a challenge to represent the views of groups. This also means that members of groups need to stand up for their views. For example, if you are part of a human rights organization, but do not approve of their stated views on a particular country, you should make your voice heard. This presents a challenge to group leadership because they have to make the group’s stated views more general in order to not alienate any of the participants. In addition, people do not have a general view on how decisions should be made. For example, the article mentioned how the activist AIDS organization, ACT UP, had a great deal of trouble coming up with a consensus about whether or not they should testify in front of Congress. These facts mean that the views and perspectives of a group of people, their subjectivity, is more of an ever-changing process than a static group of opinions and should be treated as such. This idea is significant to communication as a whole because it helps understand why it is important to constantly make sure that no one’s views in a group are being marginalized.…

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Groups that are strategically formed and active will prosper though their endeavors. Creating a successful group can be seen as a difficult task. In reality, numerous factors must be accounted for in the process of organizing an efficient group for important situations and decisions. In his essay, “Small Change” Malcolm Gladwell states, “…if you’re taking on a powerful and organized establishment you have to be a hierarchy” (237). The group must create a thorough plan with objectives for each individual participating in order for all aspects to be controlled. In the essay, “Committees, Juries, and Teams”, James Surowiecki claims, “One of the real dangers that small groups face is emphasizing consensus over dissent” (476). Often groups feel the need to agree on their points of view. In each strong group, a “devil’s advocate” is an important role that must be filled. Instead of each person agreeing on every problem in question, one person must support the opposing side in order to reach a well thought out solution. Then, those in charge of the group consider the ideas presented and include their beliefs as well. As each person in the hierarchy states their opinion, the conclusions become stronger.…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays