In Venezuela a slave revolt in 1816 created mass paranoia among white settlers resulting in capable Prado republican commanders being executed due to the fear of rebellions similar to Haiti; effectively undermining the strength of the republican fighting force. Even though the fear of a rebellion was always present in Brazil due to it having the largest slave population in the western hemisphere, it was ultimately a scions of the Portuguese crown that declared Brazil independent and fought in support of this action against Portugal. In Brazil the issue was centered more around the Creole who remained loyal to the Portuguese crown and did not want independence which essentially undermined efforts towards it. Wealthy people’s fear of non-white rebellions was understandable given the mass attempts at social change around the Atlantic created several opportunities for reenactments of Haiti’s Independence among the poor, enslaved and indigenous populations in several colonies across the …show more content…
Morelos was in support of only those born in Mexico maintaining political power “he wrote to his commanders, that they should consider as enemies of the nation, all the rich people, nobles and landowners, both creole and European”. Such drastic attacks on creole’s wealth and positions resulted in most of them deserting Morelos and returning to the Peninsulares to fight against such social reform. The pro-indio principles embraced by Hidalgo and Morelos and the creoles subsequent embrace of Spanish rule as result, show the direct negative effects of fear against non-white revolution. Mexico’s independence was gained through negotiation which declared Mexico independent on September 22, 1821, an independence that would not be formally recognized by Spain until