Preview

How Did Tsar Nicholas II Cause The French Revolution

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
882 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Did Tsar Nicholas II Cause The French Revolution
Prior to the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria, and the beginning of World War I, Russia had struggled as a nation. Following the embarrassing loss of the Russo-Japanese war in 1905, and the losses by their ally, Serbia, in both the Balkan Wars and the crisis in Bosnia, Russia could not handle another loss. Shortly after their defeat by Japan, Tsar Nicholas II was forced to reform due to a failed revolution. Although the revolution was technically a failure, the advancements made in reform made the revolution somewhat worth it to those who were revolting. The revolution forced Tsar Nicholas the II to set up a more democratic form of government, by granting the state a constitution, and establishing a Russian parliament, known …show more content…
The first of these alliances was called the Triple Alliance. This alliance was formed in 1882. These members were Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Italy. However, Italy was not a main actor in this alliance, because they had come to a neutrality agreement with France. Because of German ties to Austria, if Russia were to help Serbia, that would mean Russia would also have to face Germany. If Russia was going to have any involvement in the conflict whatsoever, the support of France was desperately needed. This need developed the second major alliance formed prior to World War I. This alliance was known as the Triple Entente. Like the Triple Alliance, the Triple Entente consisted of three members, and linked together Russia, Great Britain, and France. Russia and France had been in alliance since the year 1894, but Great Britain was added in by negotiation in 1907. This alliance provided a powerful counter alliance to the one previously established by …show more content…
Although they entered the war with the largest army, having 1,400,000 soldiers standing, and over 5,000,000 soldiers when mobilized, the country’s military was still behind (Encyclopedia of Marxism, n.d.). This issue was due to the country being behind in technological advancements, such as weapons. Another issue the country faced with their military was issues with the terrain, lacking efficient ways to travel, and a good road system.
Russia, through their presence in the Balkans, and alliance with Serbia, had enough of a political reason to be involved in the war. However, the stakes were very high. With the state of their country economically and socially being below average at best, the monarchy could fall with another loss, and the people of Russia could struggle tremendously. The country’s decision to engage in war would be one of two options: the rise of the country, or the tragic fall of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    2) Which nation joined the Triple Entente alliance in the early 1900s (and to complete the alliance?)…

    • 2761 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    War broke out in 1914, with Tsar Nicholas becoming commander-in-chief in 1915, meaning he was away from Petrograd. Not only was this poorly thought out by Nicholas because it gave the people an opportunity to plot against him, but as he was away he left Tsarina (also a German princess), Alexandra, in charge during his absence. Due to the war being against Germany, this made the Russian people nervous and skeptical towards the extreme power she had over them during such a crucial time. Not only were they disgruntled by this, but also Alexandra’s close friendship to Rasputin, a Serbian peasant. This particularly angered the aristocracy and middle classes as they believed they were being led by someone of lower demeanor than that of themselves. This weakened support for the autocratic rule and lost the Tsar many of his supporters, which put him in a vulnerable position in the case of revolutionary upturn. This also could have inspired the peasantry to discover greater aspirations and encourage their belief that they could have greater status which in turn could trigger new revolutionary ideas amongst the lower classes. This demonstrates a link between Nicholas being away in order to commandeer army movement for the war, however it is arguable that it was a lack of authority and respect for the Tsarist regime that caused the change of opinions towards the Tsar amongst all classes, lessening his support and leaving him far more vulnerable in the case of a revolution.…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A treaty was designed to keep peace in Europe, instead it pushed the continent towards war. Many alliances were kept in secret. By 1907 two major alliances were formed: the Triple Alliance and the Triple Entente The alliance that was developed were two different sides which included Austria, Germany and Italy (the Triple Alliance), and France, Russia and Britain (the Triple Entente). The alliances were formed were all defensive and would operate only when a country was attacked. The alliances and or agreements were seen as two opposing sides which were the Triple Alliance and the Triple Entente which had left Germany to be surrounded by some potential enemies.…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    was France, Germany, Britain, Russia, Austria and Italy. Britain, France and Russia formed the Triple Entente while Germany, Austria-Hungary and Italy formed the Triple Alliance. They all had…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1914 Germany and Austria declared war on Russia and their allies Serbia. Despite the fact that in 1908 Tsar Nicholas II had put into action ‘The Grand Military Programme’, aiming to rearm his forces and get Russia ready for war, the plan was set to finish in 1917, not three years earlier. Nevertheless, Russia went into war with its head held high, with full support and enthusiasm from the Russian people. By 1916 however, this support for the war had changed dramatically, as the fighting at the front had lived up to nobody’s expectations. Russia was now occupied by the enemy, proving the weakness of the Russian’s defence and the strength of the enemy. On the front line one out of three men had a rifle, due to the lack of weapons and supplies the incomplete military programme had been able to offer. The number of casualties, missing in action and death toll was catastrophic: 4 million by the end of 1915. Evidently moral of the men fighting was almost at breaking point, it was clear Russia was losing a battle they did not even want to fight. Another affecting factor on the front line was the fact that most of the…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The early years plunging Russia into the 20th century brought humiliation and prevalent discontent and resentment towards Tsar Nicholas. The decision to push Russia into a war with Japan unprepared and overconfident was the first fatal mistake Tsar Nicholas made. The humiliating blow of the disastrous war with Japan was felt nation-wide and led the people to lose faith in their “little father” and “divine ruler”. “Russia was humiliated in the eyes of…

    • 2102 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Undeniably, Nicholas II had an enormous role in bringing about the downfall of the Romanov Dynasty in March 1917. Whilst many historians argue the fall of the Tsarist regime to be the direct response and product of World War I, it is quite evident that it was Nicholas’ inefficient and fatal autocratic ruling which led to the March Revolution of 1917. The effects of Russia’s involvement in numerous wars only heightened and highlighted Nicholas’ unsuitability for the role of Tsar, and his absolute and stubborn belief in autocracy. Had Nicholas’ various choices throughout his reign differed, the Romanov Dynasty could in fact, have existed…

    • 1391 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Russia’s poor performance in the war was an extremely important factor because it led to the Tsar becoming more unpopular. At the beginning of the war, there was a strong sense of patriotisms in Russia due to the excellent war performance. The decline in Russia’s war performance caused morale in the army and country to decrease. The situation of the war was made worse by the fact that in September 1915 after the Russians lost battles to the Germans (Tannenburg and Masurian Lakes); the Tsar took personal control of the army and dismissed his uncle, the Grand Duke Nikolai. As a result the performance of the army could be blamed directly on the Tsar himself.…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nicholas II started a very unnecessary war with Japan which was a huge mistake that he made. The Tsar made plans to seize control of Constantinople and expanded into Manchuria and Korea. Japan did not like this. As he did this Japan felt threatened by his action and on February 8th, 1904 the Japanese navy surprised attacked on the Russian fleet at Port Arthur. As this point the Russian army was not in a very good place to be. Also, when World War 1 started the the Russian army was not properly supplied. By December 1914 the Russian army had 6,553,000 troops; however they only had 4,652,000 rifles. Untrained troops were forced into battle without rifles and ammunition. According to spartacus-educational.com, the army had about one surgeon every 10,000 men. Many soldiers would die from wounds that could be treated, but there was nobody to treat them. These men were sitting ducks waiting for a fellow soldier to fall just to pick up their gun to…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The system of alliances was originated by Chancellor Bismarck. An alliance was when countries joined together in a government agreement where if any one country was attacked, it was ensured that the other members of their alliance would defend them in war. By 1907 two groups were formed; these being the Triple Alliance (consisting of Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Italy) as well as the Triple Entente (consisting of France, Russia, and Britain). At this time, there…

    • 841 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Russia was pathetic. They had a HUGE army, but they didn't know how to fight. They had this thing called "mystical piety" which meant that they could commune with god if their heads were uncovered...so that meant that the soldier didnt have helmets...which meant that they died sooo easily. Not to mention the fact that often they didnt even have weapons.…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the Revolution of 1905, Russians gained new political freedom. However, Russia was still plagued with problems. The famine from previous years still raged on. In 1914, Russia joined World War I. To pay for the war, Russia raised taxes, secured foreign loans, and printed more money. This combined with many other factors, left the people of Russia wanting change. They needed the government to change, the famine to end, and economic stability.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Impact of WWI on Russia

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Although the Russian government managed to mobilise around 15 million men between 14-17, mainly conscript’s peasants it was un able to provide for them, they lacked basic weaponry, and also lacked basic warm clothing and properly footwear as every two rifles were provided for every three men.…

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    History

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages

    I believe that one of the main reasons for the Tsar’s abdication and the collapse of the Romanov rule was the poor state which Russia was in. Russia’s economy was at the worst it had ever been. The economy was far worse than other countries in the War. There were millions of peasants in Russia who had very limited amount of money. With such a limited amount of money, many peasants were unable to buy food, and drink to help them to survive. Peasants believed that they weren’t getting rewarded fairly for the work which they were doing. The upper classes’ benefit greatly due to work done by the Peasants. This created a negative atmosphere around Russia and helped fuel the need for a change. Peasants wanted change; they wanted to be rewarded more for their efforts at work. Russia was in an economic crisis. They had borrowed a huge amount of money from capital countries in order to fuel Russia’s war effort. This was a problem for Russia because they simply didn’t have the money to repay these countries. During the war the country had suffered inflation. Prices had risen dramatically for everyday items such as bread. The country was suffering and the Russian people’s families were dyeing in a war which wasn’t being funded. The Russian people were bound to be discontent and they only had one person to blame and that was the Tsar.…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The abdication of the Tsar in 1917 is still talked about today; the reasons are still disputed to this day. There are three main views; the optimist view which states that Russia was on the right path but the First World War slipped Russia into revolution. This view is supported by A.Gerschenkron who says, “That in the absence of war, Russia could have continued in the road of progressive westernisation”. The second is the Marxist view which suggests that Russia was on the verge of revolution until war broke out. In addition, this view also comes with the idea that war was ultimately good for Russia as it unified the country under the Tsar, but also it suggests that as the war prolonged, Russia was heading down the revolutionary path yet again. The last view is called the Synthesis view which suggests Russia’s revolution was going happen no matter but the war was just a catalyst in this process. The view that I agree with is the synthesis view, the idea that revolution was coming but war sped up the process. The main reason I agree with this is because as oppression increases the people become radical and we already saw this in ‘1905 revolution’, there are also many examples of this happening in modern day history.…

    • 1556 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays