Preview

How Does Animal Testing Affect Human Life

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1146 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Does Animal Testing Affect Human Life
Inji Ha
Professor Dement
IDS 102
3 November 2016
Animal Experimentation Animals impact human life by giving company and happiness once nobody else is willing. The humanity wouldn't know what try to do if animals didn't exist. Animals, like humans, have legal rights in the United States, together with the right to be free from exploitation, abuse, neglect, and research. Animal experiment isn't a new kind of research; the exploration of human and animal bodies began centuries ago. In the third century, animals and humans were the primary organisms used to satisfy anatomical curiosity, long before the development of anesthetics. Testing on animals have now become cruel to a point where alternatives should be found. The research affects not only
…show more content…
Also, no one could imagine that animals and laboratory technicians are feeling depression, and hopelessness. Alternatives need to be find and put into action to save animals and humans who are suffering in silence. There are safe forms of animal experimentation to humans when used formally and appropriately. Scientists developed and used new methods for testing products that are relevant to human and replace animals. These modern methods include sophisticated tests using human cells and tissues, also known as in vitro methods, advanced computer-modeling techniques, and studies with human volunteers. These methods are take less time and money than animal experiment. If treated properly, animals feel that they have something to live for. Works Cited
"Animal Legal Defense Fund." Gale Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Detroit: Gale, 2014. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Sun. 6 Nov. 2016.
Wright, George, and Steve Hoagland. "Counterpoint: Animal Testing Is Cruel and Immoral Regardless of The Benefits Associated With It." Animal Experimentation. Ed. Susan C. Hunnicutt. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2014. At Issue. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Sun. 6 Nov. 2016.
"People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA)." Gale Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Detroit: Gale, 2014. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Sun. 6 Nov.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Also, Paul Watson, in his essay “Loving Nature with a Gun,” (2006) addresses the topic of animal treatment. The Canadian animal rights and environmental activist and former Sierra Club National Director aggressively argue that the Sierra Club, an animal and environmentalist organization, is portraying an inappropriate and hypocritical image of the corporation. Watson relies on a strong appeal to pathos in the form of personal opinion as well as logos presented as statistics to support his main claim.…

    • 1672 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Regan, Tom. "Animal Rights, Human Wrongs." Forming a Critical Perspective. Boston, MA: Pearson Learning Solutions, 2010. 336-40. Print.…

    • 1234 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Leonard Thompson Biography

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Scientists are constantly looking for new medical advances that they hope will save people’s lives and often turn to animals as the optimal resource for testing new ideas and products. These animals range from rats and mice to dogs and monkeys. On top of varying animals, the tests they run fluctuate from simply checking the effectiveness of a medicine already in use to testing an entirely new form of treatment. However, there have beens years of controversy over the morality of using animals as the test subjects.…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    PETA, or people for the ethical treatment of animals, begins their argument with many facts from studies proving that they have credible information. Unfortunately, the information they present throughout the article does not effectively support that animal testing is in fact bad science. Within the piece there are points and counterpoints which contradict each other thus throwing off the overall effectiveness. These points may confuse the reader with…

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Is Rodeo Cruel to Animals

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages

    • “Rodeo: Cruelty for a Buck.” PETA Media Center. 2001-2006. PETA. 19 Mar. 2010 .…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Animal testing, also known as animal experimentation, or in vivo testing, often uses non-human animals in experiments to test the safety of products and has been a topic of heated debate for decades. Although some research uses animals only for natural behaviors observation, F. Barbara Orlans claimed in her book, In the Name of Science: Issues in Responsible Animal Experimentation, that more than sixty percent of all animals used in animal testing suffer from experiment procedure or even get killed in biomedical research and product-safety testing. On the one hand, successful animal testing can lead to medical cures and treatments for human beings, on the other hand, opponents are doubting the reliability of animal…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cited: Epstein, Alex and Yaron Brook. "The Evil of Animal "Rights"." James, Missy and Alan P. Merickel. qtd in Reading Literature and Writing Argument. Upper Saddle River: Prentice hall, 2008. 604-605. Text. 8 September 2012.…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A History of The Humane Society of the United States, the Animal Rights Movement and their influence on the American society…

    • 3516 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although the equal rights of animals is in question, The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA) effectively advocates for the well-being of animals by providing health care assistance and legal advocacy, searching out the problem to find a solution that is potent, and rescuing them from danger. The ASPCA does compile available resources with intentions to better the lives of animals. Statistics substantiate that the numbers of animals entering shelters in a year's time does not counterpart with the number of animals leaving the shelter in the same year’s time. For this reason, the ASPCA sets out to not only find, but also to resolve the conflict. The organization has…

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal Testing Speech

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Animal testing, is also known as animal experiments in the act of using non-human animals in research, to develop projects or scientific experiments. Statistics show that each year, there are millions of animals such as cats, dogs, mice, rats, ferret, hamsters and monkeys that experience mental and physical torture due to scientific research. Although most people agree that animal testing is horrible and cruel, there are few who this is it necessary to find new medicines. During the experiments, the animals are forced to inhale or sallow large amounts of test substances. Which are often found to be poisonous and toxic. The largest concern, is that animals are being used in experiments and not humans. Meaning that the results might or might not be useful for all the humans. Million of animals are suffering from poor conditions of living, and then to…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal Testing Outline

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Regan T.(2004). The Case for Animal Rights: Updated with a New Preface. University of California Press.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imagine being confined to a cold cage, no bigger than you, without family, or friends, watching, as one by one, your compatriots leaving, but never come back, waiting silently for your turn. Good morning audience of the Federal Youth Parliament, this is what many animals endure before their final moments, tortured, hurt, and isolated. Animal experimenting is a national system of sadistic torture, vivisection, and genocide, which has been carried out for generations under the disguise of “medical research” and definitely must be stopped. The three main reasons for banning this grotesque science are: present experimentation is currently not species specific therefore results are inaccurate, killing for beauty is not worth it, and animals are more useful alive.…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Last year, over 167 million animals died due to animal research. At this rate, the number of animals that will die this year will be well over 200 million. Animals used in these testing facilities are treated in inhumane and disgusting ways. Dogs are forced to eat pesticides, monkeys have their skulls cracked, mice grow tumors larger than their own bodies, bunnies are blinded, the list of cruelties goes on and on. After having these excruciating and terrifying experiments performed on them, they are usually dumped back into a cramped…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In today’s society, many people debate whether or not using animals in research is humane. An estimated 26 million animals are used every year in the United States for scientific and commercial testing. [2] Proponents of animal testing state that it has enabled the development of numerous life-saving treatments for both humans and animals, while opponents state that animal testing is cruel and often yields irrelevant results because animals are so different from human beings. Many different animals are used in scientific studies such as rabbits, mice, primates, dogs, cats, pigs, and cows. I believe that animal testing is beneficial because it provides opportunities to improve the lives of both humans and animals.…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Animal activists are calling for a ban on animal testing despite the fact that with the development of new treatments, which are tested on animal in treating HIV, cancers, and other epidemics, people who live the day hopelessly in the threat of death from such diseases now can see the hope of being cured. In opposition, many scientists and medical institutions claim that animal right activists are overreacting. The fight between one, who suppose the need for testing on animals, and the other, who are animal right activists, recalls a historical controversial issue, which seems undisputable since Darwin 's letter to The Times of 1881 defending animal experimentation and the response to his letter from an anti-vivisectionist, Frances Power Cobbe (Blakemore). In this case, we cannot say who is right and who is wrong. Each side has its own merits and a large number of supporters. However, in recent years, we have to witness a sadly fact that some people are misunderstanding the word “anti-vivisection.” A number of groups even use aggressive, intimidating tactics to attack or threaten scientists who conduct animal testing. Sadly, these activists put a shadow over the other individuals who are against animal testing but show their opinions through peaceful means. It seems that the fight over using animals in experimentations will continue for many years later. In addition, people who stand for animal right should be more open to recognize the role of animal testing before calling for a permanent ban on all use of animals. Animal experimentations are necessary in improving life quality and saving not only human life but also the lives of many other animals.…

    • 1984 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays