Preview

How Does Gordon Wood Characterize Colonial America As A Pre-Modern Society?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
700 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Does Gordon Wood Characterize Colonial America As A Pre-Modern Society?
In the book The Radicalism of the American Revolution, Gordon S. Wood analyzes Colonial America on the eve of the American Revolution. By describing the social hierarchy and patriarchal dependence in the colonies, he depicts the colonies as a pre-modern society.
Gordon Wood depicts colonial America as a pre-modern society by describing the social hierarchy of the time period. The colonists lived with an intricate class system that was strictly followed. Those of higher standing were to be afforded respect by people in lower classes, and any interaction between those of different classes was to be entirely professional. It would have been seen as condescending, or even degrading, for a person of higher status to interact with someone of a lower
…show more content…
Rather, they were based off of a person’s status or “quality.” Those who had no property were considered part of the lowest social ranking, and then there were the artisans, and finally at the top there were the gentleman. Movement between classes was unlikely, an artisan would always be of the middle class no matter how wealthy, but one could move within their own class to a position of greater respect. It was a rigid and unequal system, but it ensured that everyone had a place within society, which was perhaps why it lasted so long in pre-modern America.
Gordon Wood also describes colonial America as pre-modern by discussing the patriarchal dependence evident in its society. According to Wood, when it came to dealing with subordinates and inferiors, those of higher classes “often thought of themselves as parents dealing with children” (43). This mindset was apparent on all levels of society. The King was seen as a parental figure to his subjects, just as the master of a house was seen as a parental figure to his family and servants. In turn, subjects of the throne were dependant on the King, and family members and servants in the home were dependant on the
…show more content…
Indentured servitude, for example, was a common occurrence. People would enter into contracts with the head of a family, some to pay off passage to the colonies, others for different reasons, and would work either as a house servant or as an agricultural servant. Those in such positions were dependant on and at the mercy of their master, who could treat them like property. “Most colonial servants,” Wood states, “could be bought or sold, rented out, seized for the debts of their masters, and conveyed in wills to heirs… [servants] could not marry, buy or sell property, or leave their households without their master’s permission” (53). Additionally, some households had slaves, who legally had no rights and were completely dependant on their masters. In fact, so many people were in some form of servitude or another that “at any one moment, as much as one-half of the colonial society was legally unfree” (Wood,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The American Revolution is central to this process because it reversed a counter-modernization trend by opening up huge regions for westward settlement. Unlike Wood who focuses on the ideological effects of the revolution on the common man through the rhetoric of equality, Brown argues the post-war development was fundamentally economic, with land being the great equalizer. In Feudalism, Communalism, and the Yeoman Freeholder (1973), John M. Murrin vacillates on the importance of the American Revolution to later social development in the United States. He is willing to concede an argument which is similar to Wood’s monarchy/democracy theory, while skipping over the republicanism phase.…

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The colonial assembly in Virginia gradually changed their laws regarding servitude over the course of about sixty years. Beginning in 1643 their laws of servitude dealt entirely with indentured servants with no mention of race at all. This is likely because these laws were in reference to white servants. In March 1661 the assembly mentions “negroes” in reference to them running away with a white servant. Surprisingly, since blacks were already slaves for life, the white servant would “serve for the time of the said negroes absence.”…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    HIST 201 Final Exam

    • 1271 Words
    • 4 Pages

    (6) Indentured Servitude – Was the primary labor system in the Chesapeake colonies for most of the seventeenth century.…

    • 1271 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I’ve chosen to review “A Little Commonwealth” by John Demos. In this book, it’s obvious that Author, John Demos, is intent on developing his analysis with materials Indigenous to the Plymouth colonies. In the forward to “A Little Commonwealth” Demos states, “It was my wish to write a type of case study in early American life – a Study which, through sustained work on materials from one community, produces questions, methods of approach, and even some substantive conclusions that will ultimately have a much wider application”. When Demos first started his work he looked into the courts records from the Plymouth Colony, which he found to be negative and bias. Mostly pointing out what the colony (as a whole) disapproved of rather than what daily life was actually like for the individual families that lived there. Demos thought information he found was too formal regarding family interaction and less from a personal or emotional standpoint. Demos then turned to the earlier essays collected in the works of John Robinson - The Works of John Robinson (who was the original Pilgrim pastor), William Bradford’s - Of Plymouth Plantation, and Edmund Morgan’s - The Puritan Family to gather most of his information.…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    "Radicalism of the American Revolution" By Gordon S. Wood Gordon Wood's Radicalism of the American Revolution is a book that extensively covers the origin and ideas preceding the American Revolution. Wood's account of the Revolution goes beyond the history and timeline of the war and offers a new encompassing look inside the social ideology and economic forces of the war. Wood explains in his book that America went through a two-stage progression to break away from the Monarchical rule of the English. He believes the pioneering revolutionaries were rooted in the belief of an American Republic. However, it was the radical acceptance of democracy that was the final step toward independence. The transformation between becoming a Republic, to ultimately becoming a democracy, is where Wood's evaluation of the revolution differs from other historians. He contributes such a transformation to the social and economic factors that faced the colonists. While Gordon Wood creates a persuasive argument in his book, he does however neglect to consider other contributing factors of the revolution. It is these neglected factors that provide opportunity for criticism of his book. The overall feeling one gets from reading Wood's book is that republicanism was not a radical concept to the American colonists. Wood believed the American colonists had a deep- rooted concept of Republicanism that existed before revolutionary ideas were conceived. The idea of republicanism could be seen in the colonial belief in independence and self-sacrifice. These principles were the founding forces that led to the beginning of the revolution. Wood would seem to believe that these founding forces Smith pg.2 were not as radical as the transformation to democratic thought. It is here that Wood points out the "uncontrollable" social and economic forces that leads republican thought to the progression of democracy. Wood believes the revolution was meant for the elite (gentlemen) and not…

    • 1547 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Through Gordon Wood’s work, entitled The Radicalism of the American Revolution, I am convinced that the American Revolution was the most radical event that occurred in American history. In the face of the ways and basis of other revolutions that occurred in history, the American Revolution was unlike any other major rebellion of the past for it completely shaped our nation’s foundations for the future. The revolution sought drastically different ideologies within the nations politics, society and culture. The American Revolution was as radical as any revolution in modern history, for it replaced monarchical authority with representative government and created a society that was far more democratic than even the founding fathers had anticipated. These new ways of thinking are why Gordon Wood strongly believes that the American Revolution was "the most radical and far-reaching event in American history".…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Anne Orthwood

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Anne Orthwood’s Bastard tells the story of John Kendall and Anne Orthwood and their bastard son, Jasper. It began with John and Anne’s meeting and ended when Jasper came of age. This book gave a detailed description of sex and law in early Virginia and how it differed from the law in England at the time. Two of the main themes seemed to be respectability and social mobility. During the 1660’s and 1670’s in Virginia, respectability and social mobility were two of the most important aspects people during that time aspired to accomplish. If one could climb the social ladder and gain the respect of their town, they were considered extremely successful. A person’s ability to gain this acceptance and move up in the social community ultimately had a direct correlation with what blood lines they married into, where they came from, and their family’s status within the community. However, these things did not guarantee one’s social status as the examples that follow indicate.…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the early 1700’s the lives of men and women were very different. Social equality was not extended to the women in the household. Wealth, intelligence, and social status were not of importance when it came to be head of the household. They were taught that their husbands were above then and that it was a “wife’s duty” to “love and reverence them,” (Henretta 97).…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Today’s modern American Society consisting of equality and freedom for all did not always exist. The nation was initially defined by the laws and actions of Great Britain, and whether or not to separate from Britain was not decided until 1783. In the early 1760’s, Colonials did nothing more than question the true intention of British policies. These people were searching for a sign that they had a voice in the laws they were to obey. However, as time progressed, the colonials began to develop less passive attitudes.…

    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Indentured servitude was a system of temporary service which originated in England. The length of service usually lasted four to five years. During that time, the subject was bound to their master. They received compensation in the form of transportation to America, food and shelter. At the completion of their service, they were also to receive additional benefits such as clothing tools, and land which rarely actually happened. (American History, p68)…

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “In part because of geographical differences, distinct regional lifestyles developed. This led to stereotypes, or exaggerated images, of different groups. The “Yankees” of the Northeast, with its growing cities and bustling trade, were enterprising, thrifty, and—in the eyes of southerners—quick to chase a dollar. The rich plantation owners of the South were gracious, cultured, and—in the eyes of northerners—lazy. The frontier settlers who sought their fortunes in the West were rugged, hardy, and—in the eyes of people on the East Coast—crude.” That’s why it was so hard for people to come together. I think this is mostly true in today as well as it was back then because we are still battling racism and stereo types I know that we will always have racism just because not everybody can like everybody even though this is ideal it will never happen sadly enough my second quote from this section is “After the British burned Washington, D.C., during the War of 1812, Congress hired architects to rebuild the White House and the Capitol in a style that would equal the grand, stately buildings of Europe. Congress complained about the cost, but not about…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bibliography: "Patriarchy in Colonial America." Patriarchy in Colonial America. N.p., n.d. Web. 18 Sept. 2013.…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the Victorian Era, the economic, social, and political status was one huge “tennis ball” effect. The Social conditions of Charles Dickens time were stable, and although there were clear distinctions between classes, they were referred to by “rank” or “order”.…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Inequalities in the Victorian Social Class Structure in Great Expectations In Victorian society, there was a clear separation of the classes. The poor lived a life to which society looked down upon them with lives lacking opportunity. The rich lived a lavish life on top of the hierarchy with great opportunity. Each of the classes was separated by their financial situations and heritage, which lead to their daily life situation.…

    • 2543 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Society in Early Modern England was rigidly structured in a hierarchical system, in which God was at the top, and peasants and vagrants occupied the bottom slot. Society was also split in to two classes, those who governed, and those who were governed over. The governing class was made up of the nobility and the gentry. They controlled two thirds of England's land, but made up only five percent of the population. The other ninety five percent were the governed class. They included wealthy merchants lawyers and non-titled lawyers, although they were by far the minority. The majority were tenant farmers, landless labourers, paupers and vagrants. The structure was not completely set. You could move up in society, by a good marriage or getting land. You could also move down. Early Modern England was also a patriarchal society, in which women, of any class, were seen to be inferior to men.…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays