Preview

How Does Machiavelli Characterize The Romans

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
534 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Does Machiavelli Characterize The Romans
Machiavelli, a most intelligent man who lived in Florence, wrote an opinionated handbook for princes (or soon to be princes) and the factor of referencing history is what he included to make his novel so much more reliable, supported, and legitimate.
He often alludes to the Romans, discusses the Carthaginians, and Hannibal. While discussing which principalities one should please, Machiavelli uses the Romans as his good example. They, without personal gain, settled in and supported some principalities, and crushed others. "The Romans, in the countries they seized, did watch these matters carefully. They established settlements, supported the weaker powers without increasing their strength, crushed the powerful, and did not allow any powerful
…show more content…
The example helps the reader effectively because it shows how effective the advice is when used in a real life occurrence and the outcome. The Carthaginians are mentioned when Machiavelli discusses his hatred and distrust in guns for hire. He even tells the reader what a good example they are. "The Carthaginians provide an example of reliance on mercenary arms in ancient times. They were very nearly subjugated by their mercenary troops, after the first war with the Romans was over,even though their own citizens held the positions of command."(Page 41) Mercenaries are deemed poisonous ("useless and dangerous") by Machiavelli. Not only are they useless and dangerous, the prince who hires them looks weak and incapable of leading his own people into battle. It would be preferred to have faithful and true army. Not only true to your leader but true to your principality and being able to fight with your heart. They were also lazy at night, and in the winter months. The Carthaginians "almost downfall" is enough to scare any new prince away from a hired mercenary. In the novel, Machiavelli has a famous discussion of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    One of Machiavelli’s standards for rulers of a country is to be focused on warfare by claiming, “A prince ought to have no other aim or thought, nor select…

    • 174 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Contrary to popular belief, Machiavelli is not a diabolic political figure in search of power. He is instead an astute politician who uses his extensive knowledge of politics to analyze various princes and principalities in order to educate future…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    When concerning the idea of the overall purpose of war, Castiglione and Machiavelli would unquestionably have a response to the advice of one another. In The Book of the Courtier, Castiglione states,?It is wrong to always be at war and not to seek to attain peace as the objective?some rulers suppose that their principal aim must be to subjugate their neighbours...? (Castiglione, 303) What this statement basically means is that a leader should not intend to destroy their opposition in war, but that they should fight until peace can be realized. Castiglione gives an example of a society that did not agree with the same mentality which he did. He explained of the Scythians; a group of people who would ?not allow anyone who had not slain an enemy to drink from the cup?at their solemn feasts.? This attitude toward war would cause people to ?become bellicose and aggressive,? according to Castiglione. On the contrary to the view of…

    • 988 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout The Prince, there is a certain academic tone to Niccolò Machiavelli's writing, and the presentation of his theories and observations is extremely pragmatic. In consequence, it was surprising when, in chapter 25, Machiavelli began to speak, quite frankly, about the role of fate and fortune in a principality, saying that, "...fortune is arbiter of half of our actions, but also that she leaves the other half, or close to it, for us to govern" (98). This at first glance appears to be a far more fanciful notion than the ones that Machiavelli had previously maintained. However, as we delve deeper into Machiavelli's work, we are soon able to realize that there are underlying connections to fortunes role – as well as what our own reprisal ought to be – all throughout the text.…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Machiavelli's philosophy was that "The end justifies the means." This meant that the end result is the most important, and how you got there was of no importance. The Prince was a book of advice to rules on how to found a state and how to stay in power. Machiavelli explained in his book the many different ways to gain power. One way was to acquire land. The four methods that he discusses to acquire more land is: Your own arms and virtue, fortune, others' arms, and inequity. To Machiavelli, the word virtue meant manliness and strength. Machiavelli also advocates the use of evil to achieve any goals. He gives an example of Agathocles of Syracuse as a proof that this works and will enable the prince to rule the land peacefully through fear. "Born of a potter, this one always had an iniquitous life throughout his years: nonetheless, he accomplished his iniquities with such virtue of spirit and of body that, having joined the militia, he rose through its ranks to become praetor of Syracuse. Being established in rank, and having decided to become prince and to keep with violence and without obligation to others what had been conceded him by agreement... ...one morning he convened the people and the senate of Syracuse, as if he had had to deliberate things pertinent to the republic; and at a preordained nod…

    • 1540 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    not have a strong army they did not achieve much in terms of winning wars, instead they focused…

    • 2425 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Machiavelli remains one of the controversial figures of political history. One of his works, The Prince (also known as "A Handbook for Dictators"), contains many references to ancient history, but is mainly based on the political career of his political beliefs. His book, The Prince is often divided into four sections. The first section deals…

    • 1911 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    To best explain the character of their societies, an examination of the people played an important role in both works, and the philosophers’ adverse thoughts towards human nature were shared. In The Prince, Machiavelli famously stated that men are “ungrateful, fickle, dissembling, anxious to flee danger, and covetous of gain” (Machiavelli, The Prince 66). In fact, Machiavelli explains that the people’s disposition is so bad that they require leadership so that they won’t be led astray, because “a crowd is useless without a head” (Machiavelli, Discourses xx). The Italian philosopher’s grievances against the ineptitude of the people are solidified when he illustrates their simplicity and easy propensity to be deceived. According to Machiavelli, the people make judgments based on appearance and rhetoric, they are “misled by the false appearance of good, [so, the populace] often seeks its own ruin and brings to the republic endless dangers and disasters” (Discourses xx).…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli Thesis

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I have done numerous accounts of research, most importantly by reading the art of war written by Machiavelli. This book consists of answering the first question of who influenced him.…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli argues that a leader should be both loved and feared, but if you had to pick one, pick fear. He favors fear over being loved, because it is safer for the leader to have his followers fear him than love him. It is easier to betray someone that you have love for, than someone that you fear. Machiavelli also believes that when you have an army, in order to keep them in harmony, they would have to fear you and respect your abilities as a leader. If they had no fear of their leader they would not be as united as they would be if they solely respected him.…

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Machiavelli's View Of War

    • 1413 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Role of War Lingqi Huang A98037303 In The Prince and Utopia, Readers may take the view that Machiavelli put the role of war in a far more significant position than More does for granted, basing on the appearance that Machiavelli mentions the significance of war and army in a considerably higher frequency than More does. However, by analyzing the background of the countries in the two works, the similarities in authors’ strategy before and during the war, authors’ claim and actual practice of war, I would argue that Machiavelli and More have the similar views about the role of war and they both put the role of war in an extremely significant position that can directly determine the fate of their countries. Such analysis not only reveals…

    • 1413 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Machiavelli, Niccolò. The Prince and Other Writings. Trans. Wayne A. Rebhorn. New York: Barnes & Noble Classics, 2003. Print.…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Argument For Morality

    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In order to benefit from Machiavelli’s “moral suasion” it is imperative that one understands this chapter, which begins with the assertion of “two fundamental truths or natural conditions of political life in newly acquired characteristics.” The first natural difficulty is that in every principality, there are citizens who would willingly take arms up against their prince in the belief that they would fare better with a new prince. Machiavelli suggests that being cruel is a “natural” necessity in order to maintain the stability of a state. Major contradicts this assertion through a magnification of the first passage of chapter three. The obscurity of Machiavelli’s language makes it “impossible to discern that the second natural and ordinary necessity has even been specified,”as “the reader is only told that the second necessity of political life ‘requires that one must always offend those over whom he becomes a new prince.’” The rest of the chapter, however, seems to indicate that the second natural and ordinary necessity must be similar to self-defence. The threat of inevitable foreign invasion establishes the necessity of preservation of one’s state by “necessary…

    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Prince Secularism

    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The government should be in more control of the army, rather than having the prince in charge. The Prince was a controversial book due to Machiavelli not trusting human beings. He thinks that humans do what is best for them instead of what is best for the state. According to Machiavelli, the only way to have a successful state would be to have a prince who is in control.…

    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Machiavelli's Shortcomings

    • 1631 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Although Machiavelli’s principles functioned reasonably well in an environment of absolutist rulers, they are ultimately not conducive to a stable and flourishing society. Written in the context of war-torn city states in Renaissance Italy, Machiavelli’s rules oversimplify the nature of humans in society, stunt the ability for a society to develop intellectually, and diminish the role of leadership to that of mere power consolidation. Machiavelli’s principles grossly oversimplify the condition of humans in society. In order to understand how these principles oversimplify the human condition, the argument must be clarified. One of the main premises that underlie the style of government advocated by Machiavelli is the belief that men are, by nature, base and disloyal creatures.…

    • 1631 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays