Preview

How Does Machiavelli Characterize The Romans

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
534 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Does Machiavelli Characterize The Romans
Machiavelli, a most intelligent man who lived in Florence, wrote an opinionated handbook for princes (or soon to be princes) and the factor of referencing history is what he included to make his novel so much more reliable, supported, and legitimate.
He often alludes to the Romans, discusses the Carthaginians, and Hannibal. While discussing which principalities one should please, Machiavelli uses the Romans as his good example. They, without personal gain, settled in and supported some principalities, and crushed others. "The Romans, in the countries they seized, did watch these matters carefully. They established settlements, supported the weaker powers without increasing their strength, crushed the powerful, and did not allow any powerful
…show more content…
The example helps the reader effectively because it shows how effective the advice is when used in a real life occurrence and the outcome. The Carthaginians are mentioned when Machiavelli discusses his hatred and distrust in guns for hire. He even tells the reader what a good example they are. "The Carthaginians provide an example of reliance on mercenary arms in ancient times. They were very nearly subjugated by their mercenary troops, after the first war with the Romans was over,even though their own citizens held the positions of command."(Page 41) Mercenaries are deemed poisonous ("useless and dangerous") by Machiavelli. Not only are they useless and dangerous, the prince who hires them looks weak and incapable of leading his own people into battle. It would be preferred to have faithful and true army. Not only true to your leader but true to your principality and being able to fight with your heart. They were also lazy at night, and in the winter months. The Carthaginians "almost downfall" is enough to scare any new prince away from a hired mercenary. In the novel, Machiavelli has a famous discussion of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    One of Machiavelli’s standards for rulers of a country is to be focused on warfare by claiming, “A prince ought to have no other aim or thought, nor select…

    • 174 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli was an author and an aspiring political figure who had a strong influence on several aspects of Europe’s government. Due to his critical writings in The Prince, many historians see Machiavelli as a cruel and diabolical political figure whose true intentions were to gain power for himself. However, after looking further into Machiavelli’s political past, one can see that Machiavelli is in fact an intelligent man who possesses a hidden motive to write his novel. In his work, he covered several topics that were used by future city-state leaders to help them become successful. Machiavelli proves to be an astute political mind who used his political experience to assess the actions of famous princes and to write The Prince as a noteworthy…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    When concerning the idea of the overall purpose of war, Castiglione and Machiavelli would unquestionably have a response to the advice of one another. In The Book of the Courtier, Castiglione states,?It is wrong to always be at war and not to seek to attain peace as the objective?some rulers suppose that their principal aim must be to subjugate their neighbours...? (Castiglione, 303) What this statement basically means is that a leader should not intend to destroy their opposition in war, but that they should fight until peace can be realized. Castiglione gives an example of a society that did not agree with the same mentality which he did. He explained of the Scythians; a group of people who would ?not allow anyone who had not slain an enemy to drink from the cup?at their solemn feasts.? This attitude toward war would cause people to ?become bellicose and aggressive,? according to Castiglione. On the contrary to the view of…

    • 988 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout The Prince, there is a certain academic tone to Niccolò Machiavelli's writing, and the presentation of his theories and observations is extremely pragmatic. In consequence, it was surprising when, in chapter 25, Machiavelli began to speak, quite frankly, about the role of fate and fortune in a principality, saying that, "...fortune is arbiter of half of our actions, but also that she leaves the other half, or close to it, for us to govern" (98). This at first glance appears to be a far more fanciful notion than the ones that Machiavelli had previously maintained. However, as we delve deeper into Machiavelli's work, we are soon able to realize that there are underlying connections to fortunes role – as well as what our own reprisal ought to be – all throughout the text.…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Machiavelli's philosophy was that "The end justifies the means." This meant that the end result is the most important, and how you got there was of no importance. The Prince was a book of advice to rules on how to found a state and how to stay in power. Machiavelli explained in his book the many different ways to gain power. One way was to acquire land. The four methods that he discusses to acquire more land is: Your own arms and virtue, fortune, others' arms, and inequity. To Machiavelli, the word virtue meant manliness and strength. Machiavelli also advocates the use of evil to achieve any goals. He gives an example of Agathocles of Syracuse as a proof that this works and will enable the prince to rule the land peacefully through fear. "Born of a potter, this one always had an iniquitous life throughout his years: nonetheless, he accomplished his iniquities with such virtue of spirit and of body that, having joined the militia, he rose through its ranks to become praetor of Syracuse. Being established in rank, and having decided to become prince and to keep with violence and without obligation to others what had been conceded him by agreement... ...one morning he convened the people and the senate of Syracuse, as if he had had to deliberate things pertinent to the republic; and at a preordained nod…

    • 1540 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    not have a strong army they did not achieve much in terms of winning wars, instead they focused…

    • 2425 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Machiavelli said, "cruel behavior is to be used only when necessary for the common good". To Sir Cromwell, it is a necessity that the king's orders must be followed whatever it takes: "…it's much more a matter of convenience, administrative convenience" (Bolt, 1963, 49). Their craftiness reflects Machiavelli's writing about politics seeing it as a public responsibility that cannot afford to govern under the laws of morality. Yet to some degree, harm still comes repetitively to individuals who oppose people with dictative power. "It must be understood, that a prince … cannot observe all of those virtues for which men are reputed good, because it is often necessary to act against mercy, against faith, against humanity, against frankness, against religion, in order to preserve the state." (Machiavelli).…

    • 1911 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    To best explain the character of their societies, an examination of the people played an important role in both works, and the philosophers’ adverse thoughts towards human nature were shared. In The Prince, Machiavelli famously stated that men are “ungrateful, fickle, dissembling, anxious to flee danger, and covetous of gain” (Machiavelli, The Prince 66). In fact, Machiavelli explains that the people’s disposition is so bad that they require leadership so that they won’t be led astray, because “a crowd is useless without a head” (Machiavelli, Discourses xx). The Italian philosopher’s grievances against the ineptitude of the people are solidified when he illustrates their simplicity and easy propensity to be deceived. According to Machiavelli, the people make judgments based on appearance and rhetoric, they are “misled by the false appearance of good, [so, the populace] often seeks its own ruin and brings to the republic endless dangers and disasters” (Discourses xx).…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli Thesis

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Throughout the book, there are many examples which show who he was influenced by, particularly the Ancient Romans, like Caesar and Alexander the Great, with which I will discuss numerous examples of what they themselves did in the past and which Machiavelli talks about which shows how it influences Machiavelli,…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli argues that a leader should be both loved and feared, but if you had to pick one, pick fear. He favors fear over being loved, because it is safer for the leader to have his followers fear him than love him. It is easier to betray someone that you have love for, than someone that you fear. Machiavelli also believes that when you have an army, in order to keep them in harmony, they would have to fear you and respect your abilities as a leader. If they had no fear of their leader they would not be as united as they would be if they solely respected him.…

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Machiavelli's View Of War

    • 1413 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Role of War Lingqi Huang A98037303 In The Prince and Utopia, Readers may take the view that Machiavelli put the role of war in a far more significant position than More does for granted, basing on the appearance that Machiavelli mentions the significance of war and army in a considerably higher frequency than More does. However, by analyzing the background of the countries in the two works, the similarities in authors’ strategy before and during the war, authors’ claim and actual practice of war, I would argue that Machiavelli and More have the similar views about the role of war and they both put the role of war in an extremely significant position that can directly determine the fate of their countries. Such analysis not only reveals…

    • 1413 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    When comparing Machiavelli’s writings and Antony’s actions side-by-side, they reveal that Antony is much like the perfect prince Machiavelli describes. Machiavelli advises that a politician plays the tune the crowd wishes to her, saying that “men in general judge more by the eyes than the hands, for everyone can…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Argument For Morality

    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Machiavelli exemplifies the Romans as the standard for a wise prince, who ought to anticipate all present and future troubles; this is his foundation for all wise judgement. However, the Romans also had to anticipate foreign threats; thus all cruelty is excusable under the necessity of protecting themselves. Self-defence from an invasion is both a response to classical and Christian moral thinking, according to Major. It can become a “limitless licence of action,” though only prudence and vigilance offer true protection from the “natural difficulties of political life.” At the heart of Machiavelli’s political philosophy is the solution to such difficulties of political life: moral teaching. But the writers of antiquity, though they were realistic, envisioned an order of morality, that, according to Major, offers hope that a non-Machiavellian approach to politics…

    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Prince Secularism

    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Machiavelli believes that humans can make a huge impact in the world that surrounds them. “Rather, the prince should be ready to reward men who want to do these things and anyone who endeavors in any way to increase the prosperity of his city or his state. As well as this, at suitable times of the year he should entertain the people with shows and festivities. And since every city is divided into guilds or family groups, he should pay attention to these, meet them from time to time, and give an example of courtesy” (Machiavelli, 74). One important thing Machiavelli said was that it is crucial that the city-state citizens like the prince, so that he could remain in power.…

    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Machiavelli's Shortcomings

    • 1631 Words
    • 7 Pages

    He argues that “this is to be asserted in general of men, that they are ungrateful, fickle, false, cowardly, [and] covetous, and as long as you succeed they are yours entirely… when the need is far distant; but when [great need] approaches they turn against you” (Machiavelli 188). Through his disbelief in men, Machiavelli argues…

    • 1631 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays