Preview

How far did WWI lead to the end of the tsarist regime?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
880 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How far did WWI lead to the end of the tsarist regime?
How far did WWI lead to the end of the tsarist regime?

WW1 was a terrible time for autocracies around Europe, none survived. The only royal family involved in the 1st world war that survived was the British. We must therefore infer that World War One led to the end of the Tsarist Regime. The First World War was undoubtedly an important factor that contributed to the decision to abdicate by Tsar Nicholas II but were there others and if so which was the most significant?

The First World War had three main affects that were responsible for the downfall of the Tsar. To start with the loss of agricultural workers and horses to the army, coupled with the takeover of railway lines by the army, led to severe food shortages in towns and cities as supply could not cope. Moscow, for example, had been receiving 2,200 railway wagons of grain per month in 1914, but by Christmas 1916, this figure was down to around 300 wagons. Therefore, there was not enough food to feed the people of Russia despite the rationing that had been brought into place. This resulted in the people of Russia becoming upset and hungry and taking part in more strikes and demonstrations on the same issue of workers conditions.

Furthermore, the First World War crippled the Russian economy. The country mobilized 9% of the population in 1914 and by 1916 15.3 million men had experienced military service. The cost of fighting the war and of maintaining such a large armed force put great strains on the economy. The Budget for example rose by 8 times between 1913 and 1916 as the government now had to bring in more food and pay more troops. This was mainly financed out of higher taxes (which are always unpopular, loans and borrowing from Britain and France putting the in an incredibly weak place and with incredibly large debt. In order to pay of this debt and cover the monumental cost of the war, the government printed more money, leading to inflation. This can be seen in the way that prices

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    At the end of the nineteenth century, Russia had been plunged into depression, because the government was forced to print more and more money which caused a rise in inflation. In addition, because Russia was at war with Turkey, over thirty per cent of the government’s expenditure was being spent on the armed forces, whilst another thirty per cent was being lost on debt interest, which left little money for education or social welfare. Ivan Vyshnegradskii, the finance minister from 1887- 1892 began attempting to rescue the government finances. He reduced imports and imposed tariffs on imported goods, which forced peasants to sell more and more grain which they could not produce, this lead to a famine which overwhelmed large parts of the country in 1891. Russia was also lagging behind many of the Western countries at the time in terms of industrial development too. When count Sergei Witte was appointed finance minister in 1892, there was a desperate need to decrease inflation, improve infrastructure and encourage foreign investment. However, it is debatable how successful the policies introduced by Witte were in modernising the Russian economy.…

    • 1583 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the riots of 1917, the Tsarist regime collapsed, and many would argue that it was mainly as a result of the First World War beginning in 1914.…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Under Czar Nicholas’s rule in World War 1, there were 1,700,000 to 2,254,396 total military deaths and 410,000 civilian deaths. As the head of the Imperial Russian Army, each and every one of these deaths was blamed on Czar Nicholas, the Czar of Russia. The wrath of his people later led to the the Russian Revolution and the end of the Romanov dynasty. Czar Nicholas II was an autocratic and inefficient ruler, which caused political opposition, neglect, and internal rebellions.…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How far were the divisions among its opponents responsible for the survival of Tsarist rule in the years 1881-1905?…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How far was WW1 the main cause of the fall of the Romanovs in February 1917?…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    World War 1 was a crucial and defining factor which led to the collapse of the Romanov Dynasty in February, 1917. Without it a revolution would not have happened at this point in time. This is not to say a revolution would not have eventually happened, as there were many other contributing factors that sparked the revolution. However, what World War 1 essentially did was to heighten discontent throughout society enough for it to revolt.…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Great War was the main cause of the February 1917 Revolution. The Russian army suffered badly in the First World War due to a lack of equipment, inadequate training and poor leadership. The Tsar decided to take personal command of the army. As a result, he was blamed for the army's problems and defeats. World War I was a total disaster for Russia due to the Russian army suffering defeat after defeat at the hands of Germany. Cost of the war led to the economic collapse which then led to more anger and outrage, this shows that the Great War started a chain reaction of problems for Russia. Morale during this time was at an all-time low and soldiers and civilians alike were looking for someone to blame. In 1915, Tsar Nicholas II took personal command of the army and left St. Petersburg and moved to army headquarters in Russian, Poland. Nicholas II may have believed that, by taking charge, his army would be inspired and would fight with renewed vigour, however this had the opposite effect. Unfortunately, the Tsar knew little about the command and organisation of large military forces, and the series of defeats and humiliations continued. The organisation of the Russian army deteriorated and there were massive shortages of ammunition, equipment, and medical supplies which led to possibly the largest asset Nicholas had, the army, to lose belief and faith in…

    • 1065 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bolshevik Revolution Dbq

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There were many consequences from the Bolshevik revolution. Farmland was distributed among farmers, and factories are given to workers. The banks were nationalized and a national council was assembled to run the economy. Russia pulled out of World War I, signing the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk, conceding lots of land to Germany. Civil war, between Bolshevik (“red”) and anti-Bolshevik (“white”) forces, sweeps Russia from 1918 to 1920. Around 15 million die in conflict and the famine. The Russian economy is in shambles. Industrial production drops, trade all but ceases, and skilled workers flee the country. Despite the…

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nicholas II started a very unnecessary war with Japan which was a huge mistake that he made. The Tsar made plans to seize control of Constantinople and expanded into Manchuria and Korea. Japan did not like this. As he did this Japan felt threatened by his action and on February 8th, 1904 the Japanese navy surprised attacked on the Russian fleet at Port Arthur. As this point the Russian army was not in a very good place to be. Also, when World War 1 started the the Russian army was not properly supplied. By December 1914 the Russian army had 6,553,000 troops; however they only had 4,652,000 rifles. Untrained troops were forced into battle without rifles and ammunition. According to spartacus-educational.com, the army had about one surgeon every 10,000 men. Many soldiers would die from wounds that could be treated, but there was nobody to treat them. These men were sitting ducks waiting for a fellow soldier to fall just to pick up their gun to…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During World War I, Russia performed poorly. Although Russia had a large number of soldiers, they weren’t trained properly and they didn’t have enough weapons, ammo, or food for the entire army. The czar of Russia decided to keep fighting, instead of backing out of the war. Leading to the Russian Revolution, where Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels’ ideology, communism, heavily impacted the Russian Revolution, leading to Russia becoming the Soviet Union. World War I left a large amount of damage to Russia’s economy and society.…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the Revolution of 1905, Russians gained new political freedom. However, Russia was still plagued with problems. The famine from previous years still raged on. In 1914, Russia joined World War I. To pay for the war, Russia raised taxes, secured foreign loans, and printed more money. This combined with many other factors, left the people of Russia wanting change. They needed the government to change, the famine to end, and economic stability.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He also agreed to a constitution that limited his monarchy. It looked like had had weathered the storm of revolt, but then came World War I and the loss of 250,000 soldiers. Russia was at war with Germany. A huge Russian army was formed by forcing the working class and peasant men to join. The soldiers were not equipped or trained to fight.…

    • 2089 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The largest factor in this public unrest was the Provisional Government’s insistence that Russia should continue fighting in the First World War. Millions of Russians had been killed, a large percentage of them ‘peasants in uniform’ – farmers who were untrained and unprepared for what awaited them. With so many farmers fighting or already dead, coupled with severe inflation due to lack of government control of the economy, huge food shortages swept across Russia.…

    • 1594 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nicholas seemed not to understand the real nature of the problems his nation and his dynasty faced. Firstly, what the tsar’s power showed was how little Russia had advanced politically compared with other European nations. By the beginning of the twentieth century all major western European countries had some form of democratic or representative government. Not Russia, it had remained outside the mainstream of European political thought. There had been reforming tsars (Peter I, Alexander II) but achievements had not included the extension of political rights. In Russia in l894 it was a criminal offence to oppose the tsar or government, political parties had no legal right to exist, there had never been a free press in imperial Russia and government…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    During the years prior as well of the first years of World War 1, the war was also taking a huge effect of shaping the homefront in new ways. With a lack of workforce due to soldiers off fighting, the working class dynamic changed in a huge way. The struggle of war also led to revolutions and inner conflict on the homefront. The most profound effects that the Great War had on the homefront of European countries was a thriving new job market for women as well as increased wages, a period of political and social unrest in Russia, and an initial sense of pride and nationalism at the beginning of the war which eventually ended up and a strong sense of depression and solemness. Over the years of the war different countries experienced different…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics