Preview

How Far Does the Westminster Electoral System Ensure Strong and Stable Government?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
912 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Far Does the Westminster Electoral System Ensure Strong and Stable Government?
Westminster is the location of the Houses of Parliament, where the majority of political decisions (other than those for devolved states) are made for the nation. The current Westminster electoral system is First Past the Post (FPTP) which is used for general elections every 5 years (due to the new fixed-term parliaments brought in by the Conservative-Liberal Democrat coalition.) The FPTP system is constituency based, each person votes for a representative for their constituency and whichever party wins the most constituencies gains governmental power. First Past the Post works on the basis of a plurality of votes, that is, that the winning party need only gain the most votes out of all parties to gain power, they do not need an overall majority (50%+.) The need for a strong and stable government is through the need for a government to easily be able to pass legislation and for them to be able to withstand a full term in office.
The FPTP system firstly creates a strong government as it greatly reduces the risk of coalition governments. Single party governments are strong as they have a majority of seats within the House of Commons which means it is easy for the party to pass legislation and make decisions. As the winning party in an election only needs a plurality of votes to win constituencies and so gain a majority in the House of Commons, it is easy for a single party to gain substantial political power. Coalition governments are however, weak and ineffective as there are two parties conflicting desires to be weighed up, this means that the passing of legislation can take a long time and mean that some parties may not get what they had wished to carry out in their manifesto, which will lose them popularity with the public. In FPTP there have only been two coalitions in the last 70 years, which shows its ability to create majority party governments, this means that generally the party with the best policies (in the voter’s eyes) will be able to pass these

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the House of Commons there are many parties all fighting individually for control of the house, and to be in power and govern the land of the UK. To win the election and do this a party or coalition of parties needs a 326 majority to be able to form a government. This system creates a dominance in the house of commons if that majority is achieved sufficiently, as with Tony Blair’s landslide in 1997 where he had over a 150 seat majority, it is this kind of one party dominance I am going to be discussing in this essay and whether or not it limits parliaments main function to represent constituents and pass laws which benefit them.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Assignment 2 2014 2015

    • 480 Words
    • 3 Pages

    M2 – Compare the electoral processes used at different levels of government in the UK.…

    • 480 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are arguments to support that the PM dominates the political system. The PM has the power to do many things that will affect the state of hers/his country and therefore has to carefully consider the choices they make. The pm has many powers that proves his/hers dominance like the power of patronage, choosing the cabinet ministers, the power of royal prerogative and so on. This all gives him more power than the rest of parliament. However there are arguments to support that the PMs Power is limited; The pm may be proved weak when it comes to pressure of events, scrutiny by House of lords and opposition, the current coalition est.…

    • 1872 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The House of Commons operates under a Whips system, whereby appointed MPs ensure that all members of a particular party vote in favour of their leaders decisions. This can prevent MPs from operating independently of their party and can impede the scrutiny of government as MPs are likely to vote for their leader regardless of their own objections. The importance of party loyalty within the House of Commons is also likely to reduce the effectiveness of scrutiny as MPs rarely rebel against their party's wishes; this can prove particularly disastrous when the executive proposes new legislation as, due to the First Past the Post system which rarely produces coalitions, the government is likely to have a majority and so most MPs will vote in favour of the government.…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since 1945, there has been a single party majority government. Before the coalition, the government could control parliament due to its large majority, however we’ve seen a recent change in the relationship between the executive and legislature. The main issues that arise would be from the small majority of just 76 in the Commons, the lack of support from backbench MPs and fact that Cameron is the first Conservative Prime minister to not have a majority in the House of Lords. The Coalition of the Liberal Democrats and the Conservative party lacks both ideological and tribal unity, which would normally derive from a strong, single party majoritarian government. This provides Parliament with more opportunities to examine and scrutinize the government.…

    • 787 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Legal Studies Notes

    • 37517 Words
    • 151 Pages

    Each electorate votes for a representative for Parliament, who must obtain to majority of votes in that electorate.…

    • 37517 Words
    • 151 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fttp Pros And Cons

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages

    When more responsibility is put into the hands of the voters. the political pressure caused by the FTTP system will be relieved. Enabling voters to feel that their vote counts, and that they are better represented in their government. This change would also affect how the electoral college works. By not associating a whole state with one political party, but by giving more accurate representation of the people. Should the united states adopt this proportional system support of national government will increase and produce a better voter turnout in…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is an argument that the government has the power and right to change laws and represent people without necessarily having to be elected. This can also be known as ‘Democratic deficit’. An example of democratic deficit is the House of Lords. The members in the House of Lords aren’t elected but they get to make laws and represent the people. The members in House of Lords are usually given their seats hereditarily so many people found it unfair that they’re not elected into the Parliament but they can make decisions and laws on our behalf.…

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Additional Member System

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There are two main electoral systems to discuss, first is the AMS (Additional Member System) and second is FPTP (First-Past-The-Post System). In general, there has been a view that considers AMS as the greater choice as an electoral system. The first point is, AMS is more responsible to the will of the people due to its hybrid system. A proportion of seats in the legislative assembly are elected using FPTP while a small number of representatives—additional member—are elected in multi-member constituencies. For example, in the 2011 Scottish Parliamentary elections, 56 members of the Scottish Parliament (43%) and 20 members of the Welsh Assembly (33%) are elected in this way1.…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fptp Pros And Cons

    • 1397 Words
    • 6 Pages

    One major advantage of FPTP system is that it excludes extremist parties from gaining seats within the House of Commons; as a result of, most of the extremist parties have support in concentrated geographical locations . FPTP allows more immediate/direct communication of complaints, and ideas, brought to the House of Commons by your MP representative. These members of parliament act as messengers to the Prime Minster, just as the Governor General is the messenger to the queen . Finally, FPTP is a simple system that everyone can understand, or easily come to learn. A valid vote consists of one check mark beside your candidate, and is very easy for the electoral officials to tally…

    • 1397 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How Democratic Is the Uk?

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Secondly, First Past The Post has had a big impact on UK democracy. The system we use to elect our MPs has a real impact on how politics works in Britain. It has a direct effect on whether politicians truly represent us and whether we can hold them to account if they let us down. The defeat of the 2011 Alternative Vote (AV) referendum means it is now more important than ever to discredit our failed system and we are continuing to build the case for change at Westminster. This in turn means any of our votes just don’t count. Millions of people have no chance of deciding who their MP will be. And our votes are wasted by the system. Additionally, parties continue to focus all their time, money and effort on a handful of 'marginal seats', so just a few thousand voters can decide who runs Britain.…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How Democratic Is the Uk?

    • 1763 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Under First Past The Post (FPTP) voting takes place in single-member constituencies. Voters put a cross in a box next to their favored candidate and the candidate with the most votes in the constituency wins. All other votes count for nothing. It’s clear and simple with clear choices and a simple outcome. It allows the voter to clearly express a view on which party they think should form the next government. However,…

    • 1763 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How democratic Is the UK?

    • 1007 Words
    • 3 Pages

    When compared to other countries in the World, the UK is undoubtedly democratic because of the parliament which is a representative institution. This is a definitive guarantee that the voices of the people are heard throughout the government as the people’s wishes are properly represented. Due to public outcry, David Cameron’s proposal for military action to Syria was shut down in the houses of Commons. This illustrates the significance and power of parliament as it has direct control over all legislation. Parliament can vote against governmental proposals and block them, thus ensuring that they do not become self-interested or corrupt; this ensures that the UK is considerably democratic. Each person has an MP to promote and represent their personal interests, allowing them a voice in parliament.…

    • 1007 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another reason why the first past the post system suits Britain is that it is a simple and easily understood system. Compared to systems like the alternative vote and additional member system it is far less complex. This encourages turnout as it is simply ticking a box. This encourages those who find politics and the systems surrounding it confusing to vote. Not only is it important to receive everybody’s vote but everyone is confident and sure they have voted correctly.…

    • 1268 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Firstly, it could be argued that the more proportional electoral systems are the closest to a 'perfect' electoral system because they show what/who the people of the UK really voted for. One proportional system is the Single Transferrable Vote. This system operates by representatives being elected in large multi-member constituencies, the voting is preferential and also known as 'Voting Ordinal' where the voters can vote as many times as they want. The candidates much receive a quota known as a droop quota to actually become elected and if they reach this quota any excess votes are redistributed on the basis of 2nd preferences. The calculation used to work out the quota is (total valid poll/(seats+1))+1, which some people argue is too complicated for any elections in the UK, if no candidate reaches the quota then the lowest places candidate is eliminated and the second preferences of the people that voted for them are redistributed. This system is used successfully in many UK elections, it's used in Northern Ireland for elections such as in the Assembly, for local government elections and EU parliament elections. The Republic of Ireland and Scotland both use it for Local Elections.…

    • 2195 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays