Preview

How Far Should a State Have a Right to Monitor the Actions of People Within Its Borders?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
484 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Far Should a State Have a Right to Monitor the Actions of People Within Its Borders?
The state should monitor the actions of people within its borders if such actions pose a threat to the national security.
A nation's security is of an utmost importance to a country as it ensures the survivability of a country. It is with this reason that the government should have a right to monitor the actions of the people within its borders. This refers to individuals who engage in terrorist activities with the aim of conducting terrorist attacks in the country to instill fear in others. E.g.: In Singapore, the government monitored the actions of Mas Selamat when the police received tip off of his plan to bomb the Singapore Changi Airport in 2002, where he was eventually arrested.

The state should have a right to monitor the actions of the people within its borders, especially during stressful times such as war; as long as its monitoring does not result in the violation of human rights. Possessing the highest power, the state has jurisdiction in virtually all areas that society has to deal with. Hence, it does have the right to monitor the actions of people. In times of war, famine, disease and violent acts will arise. In such times, the general public is unable to control and detain the situation, thus requiring the intervention of a higher power. For example, the state should have the right to implement a curfew during a war. This helps keep the people safe and reduces the chance of a violent protest or riot that may result in more deaths.
Eg: During the 2010 clash between the red shirts and the yellow shirts in Thailand, the state intervened and imposed a curfew to monitor the actions of the Thais. This action has prevented more deaths and kept the people safe. Thus, the state should intervene in times of war to help control the situation. Government should not have the right to monitor actions of people when it comes to choosing one's life partner.
Individuals should be given the freedom to decide with whom they would want to spend the rest

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The state has absolute power within its territory. It can decide its own foreign and domestic policies.…

    • 1100 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The author also explains that involving the people would be critical since presuming their submissiveness risks creating resentment and lack of cooperation over time. It is important to make the people to understand the appropriateness of security measures to increase their willingness to collaborate to achieve security goals. Further, the author advocates for opening up of homeland security work to avoid working in secrecy and involve the private sector and the general public. The author sees the move to insulate information from the public as undermining the defense of critical…

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    9/11 Foreign Policy

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Normally the work of every government is to protect their citizens from internal and external attacks but in this issue no one actually saw it coming at all for example if someone builds a house in my village for example and there is a mass attack maybe from armed robbers within that area on every single week; There might be an expectation from the citizens regarding the issue of security and it is now up to the government or the head of state to protect its members or to attack the base of this criminals without their knowledge or even when they least expected it to happen. From this case study it can be shown that there is a pattern of attack on the citizens it can then prompt the government to look for security based policies to make their citizens safe from both internal and external form of aggression and then it may become either a strategy or a form of policy using this case it is indeed obvious that the 9/11 attack prompted the United States president George W Bush to take a massive step towards tackling the issue on terrorism and not just about terrorism alone but by through other avenues that will help curtail or prevent such an attack from ever happening again and this ideology of his gave birth to one of the most historical policy of the United States known as the Bush…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In recent years our security, privacy, safety and our way of life has been invaded by individuals around the world. Today this great nation has rebuilt our national security and created the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). Their main focus is in developing methods that can protect us from future threats and implement security procedures that will keep us safe. Some of these policies and guidelines have now become laws that have no margin for error and show no compassion for those that chose to invade our country. Although these policies were established to protect us they have changed the way we view a threat and even our own government. This change has pushed some to see the DHS as a potential threat to their constitutional rights. As the DHS continues to evolve, they have created new ideas to help us become aware of what possible threats can be like in the XXI century. These procedures help invoke a better understanding of what measurements we can take to secure ourselves in case of an emergency while we wait for our government to take action.…

    • 1965 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Thesis: The duty to protect and intervene in other counties affairs, militarily if necessary, to protect freedom, liberty and to prevent genocide, ethnic cleansing, and other atrocities is a doctrine to which the United States of America should hold fast to under all circumstances. Throughout American history, the government has struggled to define the fundamental purpose of U.S foreign policy: whether or not the US should intervene internationally to promote freedom and preserve democracy or to maintain national sovereignty. The international community and the obligation that it holds to preserve peace is a responsibility not to be taken lightly. The commitment to uphold freedom and liberty as stated by our very own Pledge of Allegiance should…

    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The primary purpose of this essay is to critique the United States homeland security system and its capabilities to meet both the new issues and future challenges. Besides, this exposition will address and analyze the existing efforts of apparent dichotomy that are crucial to homeland security on one hand while maintaining civil liberties on the other side.…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ghost Dance Analysis

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages

    People shouldn’t have control over others because of the abuse of the system (in this case, the government), and the deprivation of individual’s rights.…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    ▪ Need for government to protect the freedom of citizens with interference of the government that has exceeded its necessary size or scope.…

    • 270 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Antigone

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I believe that in some aspects, individual’s rights should be valued more than the governments. For instance, gay marriage today is illegal in a majority of the states in the US. In this case, I think the individual’s rights should be valued more than the opinion of the government because it has to do with the personal preference…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In today’s society, the issue of terrorism is not just a concern for some countries such as America or some Arabic countries but for all countries, and it is becoming more important that protecting own country from terrorism. Everyone probably remember the September 11 terror, which is one of the biggest attacks in recent few decades. Because of that the U.S government pays more attention to protect the country from terrorist attacks. In the process of preventing terrorism, the U.S. government focuses more on Arabic people, who committed the 9/11 attack, to find terrorists…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    U.S government

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages

    One of the governments objectives is to establish justice and insure domestic tranquility. The citizens agree to a social contract in which they are provided protection of lives and property in exchange for being regulated in tax. These principles help avoid groups of individuals from settling their conflicts by rioting and fighting. For example, Somalia never had a stable central government which led to many civil wars that eventually took over the government. In addition, the government provides for the common defense. Warfare has been linked to the origins of government in order to be protected by other civilians wanting to take over. A country that does not have a secure government, fails to control violence and endangers human lives and property within the country.…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The tragedy of September 11 revealed vulnerability to violence by non-state actors within U.S. borders. This was something we never thought would happen again after Pearl Harbor, to be attacked on our own land. These terrorist lived among us, while plotting to destroy us, it lend the question, how exactly do we stop someone who is not afraid to die? The only way to stop them is to foil the plan before it is carried out; this is the goal of the Patriot Act, for Homeland Security.…

    • 1486 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    As it has been said before, all the countries expect its government to look over the citizen’s lives and security following rules and norms that are found in what is called the political constitution and legislation, It is admitted and even required that the government should possess a structure of intelligence that resists the action of forces like: Networks of common crime, conspiracies of international terrorist groups and Terrorist actions of rebellious groups in the interior of the country ( As ETA in the case of Spain, FARC in Latin America and extremist religious groups in middle est. ). The state have, then, safety organisms, which need between other elements of: Budget, Top technology, suitable professional training, logistic and communications to keep society safe. So far, until now, it might be reasonable to say that this scenario is juridical valid and socially viable: “Every good citizen wants to live in a country that guarantees safety in its streets, in its houses, in its privacy, and make part of a calm and entrusted community in the role of intelligence of its authorities”.…

    • 806 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The concept of homeland security is not new; since the bloody birth of the United States in 1776, Americans have been engaged in securing and defending the homeland. However, the current manifestation of the expression Homeland Security was created in the crucible of modern terrorist attacks, most notably that of September 11, 2001. As Noftsinger, Newbold, and Wheeler (2007) note, today’s idea of homeland security was created in response to the increasing terrorist threat, when it was recognized that the increased terrorist threat could not be combatted through conventional means.…

    • 1332 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Government Spying

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In some instances, governments believe that it is okay to spy on their citizens in order to preserve their freedom. I personally find this concept to be absurd. Living in a country that’s history is founded upon freedom of its citizens, and escaping oppression of tyrant governments, leaves me very skeptical on this concept. I believe that if the government is spying on its citizens it is actually taking away their freedom rather than preserving it. Living in an era of increasing technology has made it much easier for a government to spy on its citizens. Because of this, it has become a problem in many places around the world.…

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays