Preview

How Far Was Edward Iv Responsible for His Own Deposition in 1470?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1206 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Far Was Edward Iv Responsible for His Own Deposition in 1470?
How far was Edward responsible for his own desposition in 1470?
When Edward VI became King in 1461, he had to deal with some unfavourable circumstances. Edward had not executed his enemies; Henry VI, Prince Edward, or Margaret of Anjou, so they escaped to Scotland. This provided an alternative King for Edward's opponents to support. He was also a usurper to the throne, therefore the majority of the nobility that were still loyal to Henry VI could use this to their favour. Additionally, Edward did not control the distant parts of the country, especially the North of England and Wales. The Kingdom was extremely divided. There were still Lancastrian castles in the Midlands that needed to be captured and/or destroyed. His government was also in severe debt. Considering Edward's age and inexperience, it was unlikely he would be able to deal with this situation effectively and provide the best possible outcomes.
However, some circumstances were actually quite favourable. Although he had to deal with a difficult situation, it would be practically impossible for Edward to do much worse than the disaster King who reigned before him, Henry VI. Edward had also proved his military credentials as a warrior King at the battles of Mortimer's Cross and Towton, showing he was not as incompetent a leader as Henry VI. He was also an ideal candidate for kingship because he was both tall and charismatic, and although he was a usurper to the throne, he was technically the strongest claimant.
The beginning of Edward's first reign can be considered reasonably successful. Edward immediatly destroyed the remaining Lancastrian castles and tried to strengthen his power base by allowing a selected number of the nobility to help him, including Warwick, Montagu and Herbert. He also ordered the execution of the Earl of Oxford and his son after he discovered plots to kill the King. Then Edward, marched his army north where a Lancastrian- Scottish force invaded England, and defeated them.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    HOW FAR WAS HENRY VII’S CONTROL OF THE NOBILITY 1485 TO 1509 DUE TO HIS FINANCIAL POLICIES? (24 marks)…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    For those reasons Harold Godwinson should have been the next King of England in 1066 because being an ally to lots of major nobles would…

    • 189 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Henry the VII becomes King of England. Henrys mother Margaret was a decendant of Edward III. This gave Henry a claim to the throne. He sequered his crown by dividing and undermining the power of nobility. obilityHenry was eventually crowned as king on August 22nd 1485. He continued to rulke from ruled from August 1485 to April 1509.…

    • 58 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When Edward VI died in 1483, there was debate as to who was most suited to take up his position on the throne. It has been argued that Richard, Duke of Gloucester had himself set on usurping the throne from the rightful heir Edward V, as soon as his brother died. Others argue that it was never the case that his immediate wishes were to seize the throne; actions after his brother’s death led him to this decision. There is evidence for and against to support the principal statement.…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry had great success when dealing with The Yorkshire Rebellion 1498. It occurred when conflict between the Earl of Northumberland and the people of Northumberland and York sparked. The people were reluctant to pay more taxes and the Earl of Northumberland was killed when explaining about the situation...this is when the rebellion began. Henry was able to stop the rebellion quickly and swiftly, the leader of the rebellion was hung along with him accomplices, showing how Henry was able to deal with challenges to his authority smoothly and efficiently. The Yorkshire Rebellion was a local affair that did little to threaten the security of the realm therefore Henry was fully successful in dealing with this challenge.…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The actions of the Scottish kingdom towards Edward I and England within the time period of 1286 – 1292 has provided a basis of great scrutiny and speculation over the years. With the death of Alexander III, Scotland was plunged into a Succession Crisis, from which a guardianship was formed to provide governance over the kingdom of Scotland. During the time following Alexander III's death, Edward I became an influential and involved constituent towards this guardianship. However, can the Scottish kingdom's decision to involve the King of England in the country's affairs be perceived as an act of naivety or was it a piece of sensible pragmatism? Furthermore, in events such as the Treaties of both Birgham and Salisbury, along with those of the Great Cause and election of John Balliol as King of Scots, all including Edward I's presence, it is possible that the kingdom of Scotland blindingly accepted the aid of their most powerful neighbour without truly considering the English king's own intentions.…

    • 2792 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I believe that Henry VIII was ultimately unsuccessful in his aims from 1509-1514. He had three mains aims during this time and these were to secure the dynasty that Henry VII had created, assert his authority over his new kingdom and Foreign Policy, which Henry was planning to completely change. Various factors and traits contributed to this lack of success, which will be explored in this essay.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ruling through minor nobles such as Scrope of Bolton, Fitzhugh and Greystoke show his capacity to be a good king as he knew that his relationship with more of the major nobles was poor and that he couldn’t trust them. By ruling through minor nobles he felt more secure and could easily manipulate them to do as he wanted. If he tried to pass useful legislation, voting to give him custom duties for life to secure a steady income, whilst with the major nobles, they wouldn’t have co-operated as easily with him. So his relationship was much more productive and left him less…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the 16th century an impressive figure of a king would mean that he demonstrated power both physically and economically and a good education. However as source two suggests, Henry might be considered less than impressive as he shows insecurities. A stronger argument though is that Henry did demonstrate the features of an impressive king as he had all the attributes listed above which is clear from all three sources.…

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Legitimacy is the key to a successful kingship. If you can be perceived as an effective and legitimate ruler by the nobility, you will remain in power. This was especially important in the early period of the reign of Edward IV because the son of Henry VI, Edward of Westminster, was still alive until he was killed at the Battle of Tewkesbury on 4th May 1471. If Edward IV not establish the legitimacy in the minds of the nobles, then they could easily justify overthrowing the usurper because the son of the rightful king, Edward of Westminster, was still alive. Our extract shows us this attempt to legitimise Edward IV by delegitimising the overthrow of Richard II by saying that Henry IV took the throne through illegal…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Is Robert 1 Important

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The English king Edward 1 had passed away before he could have a final…

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Trade Vs Manorialism

    • 2461 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Each of the english monarchs had grown more and more power. William tightened the iron fist by creating feudalism 2.0, the domesday book, and built plenty of castles. Henry I followed suit, establishing the exchequer and creating traveling judges to try courts, then Henry II, started a 12 man jury and allowed nobles to buy their way out of becoming a knight. So when Henry II died and left his son, John, to the throne, it seemed natural that the king's power would continue to grow...well not exactly this time (sorry King John). Nobody really liked King John. He was always trying to increase taxes, including illegal church taxes and noble's taxes, and inevitably lost most of England's french land ( AU REVOIR JOHNNY). Usually, the…

    • 2461 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry the VIII wanted to end his marriage to Catherine of Aragon in 1527 with using an annulment, this was then Wolsey’s job to provide what the king wanted. Due to Wolsey’s constant victories, he was able to sustain power for 15 years, outlasting the King‘s other advisers. Yet his fall was swift and dramatic, which came after his failure of obtaining Henry’s divorce from Catherine of Aragon. In regards to this, it seems clear that this is the reason why Wolsey fell from power, yet there are possible contributing factors that must take into consideration. For instance Wolsey’s failure sometimes was out of his control as Queen Catherine was Charles V’s aunt so he would never accept the annulment in fear of hear being humiliated. Charles also had captured Pope Clement this meant that all decisions would have been controlled and manipulated to Charles’ will, delaying the annulment even more. Another failure that was out of Wolsey’s control was the role of factions within the court, Anne Boleyn and her family…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the late fourteenth to mid-sixteenth century, Great Britain underwent massive changes throughout the entire realm. From the new system of deposing kings to religious upheavals, England during this time had a hard time finding peace. During those two hundred years, personal ambition of kings and nobles was the most disruptive to English society, which was exacerbated by the religious break instituted by Henry VIII in 1534.…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Tudor dynasty experienced differing uncertainties throughout their reigns on the throne of England. From politics and war overseas, to succession difficulties. Each Monarch throughout early modern England faced conflicting challenges and hardships, nevertheless Henry VIII stands out among them all. Henry’s turbulent years on the throne presents an evolution throughout English society, culture, religion and politics, to name a few. Henry was not expected to become King, being only the third child of Henry VII, himself also an unexpected King, winning his throne on the battle field against Richard III in 1485. His early youth was not that of the first in line to the throne, due to the unexpected death of this elder brother Arthur, Henry…

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays