Preview

How Did Harold Godwinson Become King In 1066

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
189 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Did Harold Godwinson Become King In 1066
Harold Godwinson should've been king in 1066.

Harold Godwinson was the richest man in England and had been Earl of Wessex for many years. He had been the advisor for Edward the Confessor as well as Edward’s brother-in-law because his sister married Edward in 1045. Harold was one of the most powerful nobles in England, which proves he was an experienced warrior; the Godwin family had also established alliances with all of the major noblemen in England. He understood how England should’ve been governed therefore proving himself to be a good leader. Additionally, Harold was the Witan’s choice to become king.

For those reasons Harold Godwinson should have been the next King of England in 1066 because being an ally to lots of major nobles would
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    How Did William's Actions Respond To 1066
    • 9305 Words
    • 38 Pages

    How Did William's Actions Respond To 1066

    William 's later chroniclers claim (after the fact) that Edward the Confessor offered William the crown and sent Harold to pledge it to him in the Winter of 1064/5. In fact, reading between the lines we can see that Harold was shipwrecked in Normandy whilst trying to visit France, and took advantage of the situation by trying to secure the release of his brother & nephew who were held as hostages in…

    • 9305 Words
    • 38 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    In the Years Between 1547-1558, English Government Was at Its Most Effective During the Rule of Mary I
    • 1806 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In the Years Between 1547-1558, English Government Was at Its Most Effective During the Rule of Mary I

    An effective foreign policy could be described as making alliances, gaining land with beneficial resources and wealth, and not getting invaded, all of which Edward succeeded whilst having Northumberland as his advisor. During the period of 1547-1549, Edward’s regent, Somerset, created a rather unsuccessful and ineffective foreign policy, with him not gaining an alliance with France and his Scottish foreign policy failing. Somerset did try to gain an alliance with Scotland, which would have gained security benefits for Edward, because he was a minor and with Mary Stuart marrying the French heir, France had an opportunity to challenge England’s regency government. However, peace would have been better for the economy and stability during the royal minority, rather than an active foreign policy. Heard argues that Somerset really had to take up the war against Scotland left by Henry VIII in order to see it through to its end, the marriage of Edward VI and Mary Stuart. However, Houlbrooke disagrees and believes Somerset intended that his great achievement would be the Scottish marriage and then he would hold Scotland with permanent garrisons of English and mercenary troops; he did not have to follow Henry VIII’s policy. Overall, Somerset’s foreign policy had politically failed because his obsession with Scotland had influenced him to delay dealing…

    • 1806 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    To what extent were the Scots guilty of naivety in their dealings with Edward I in the period 1286 – 1292?
    • 2792 Words
    • 8 Pages

    To what extent were the Scots guilty of naivety in their dealings with Edward I in the period 1286 – 1292?

    The actions of the Scottish kingdom towards Edward I and England within the time period of 1286 – 1292 has provided a basis of great scrutiny and speculation over the years. With the death of Alexander III, Scotland was plunged into a Succession Crisis, from which a guardianship was formed to provide governance over the kingdom of Scotland. During the time following Alexander III's death, Edward I became an influential and involved constituent towards this guardianship. However, can the Scottish kingdom's decision to involve the King of England in the country's affairs be perceived as an act of naivety or was it a piece of sensible pragmatism? Furthermore, in events such as the Treaties of both Birgham and Salisbury, along with those of the Great Cause and election of John Balliol as King of Scots, all including Edward I's presence, it is possible that the kingdom of Scotland blindingly accepted the aid of their most powerful neighbour without truly considering the English king's own intentions.…

    • 2792 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Far Did Richard III Demonstrate The Capacity To Be A Good King 1483-1485?
    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Far Did Richard III Demonstrate The Capacity To Be A Good King 1483-1485?

    Richard III demonstrated a great capacity to become a good king. Whilst in charge he made many wise decisions and the bad choices were made with the best of intentions or due to necessity. I will show how far he had the capacity to become a great king.…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Maude Roll: Lancastrian King Henry V
    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Maude Roll: Lancastrian King Henry V

    Legitimacy is the key to a successful kingship. If you can be perceived as an effective and legitimate ruler by the nobility, you will remain in power. This was especially important in the early period of the reign of Edward IV because the son of Henry VI, Edward of Westminster, was still alive until he was killed at the Battle of Tewkesbury on 4th May 1471. If Edward IV not establish the legitimacy in the minds of the nobles, then they could easily justify overthrowing the usurper because the son of the rightful king, Edward of Westminster, was still alive. Our extract shows us this attempt to legitimise Edward IV by delegitimising the overthrow of Richard II by saying that Henry IV took the throne through illegal…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    How Did Edward III Overcome The Challenges To His Rule
    • 1818 Words
    • 8 Pages

    How Did Edward III Overcome The Challenges To His Rule

    One of the key reasons why Edward IV was able to defeat challenges to his rule in 1470-71, whereas Richard III was not in 1485, is the position of the opposition to the monarch at that time. If the opposition were not supported and in a disadvantageous situation then the threat that they posed would be significantly smaller than if they were supported and had an advantage, be it politically or resourcefully, on the ruler. Similarly, another of the reasons as to why one ruler could overcome such challenges and another couldn’t is the strength and position of the monarch themselves. This factor can also be significantly…

    • 1818 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Was Henry Vii an Innovator?
    • 1491 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Was Henry Vii an Innovator?

    Henry VII took the throne after a battle against the former king Richard III whose forces outnumbered Henrys by two to one. Henry VII had a couple of big problems, one of them was that there were people that had a stronger claim to the throne than he did, his only claim was that god let him win the battle, therefore the nobility didn’t respect him at the beginning of his reign. Another of the problems he faced was the fact that he feared a lot about his security and about his son, and in order to keep his family and himself safe, he signed treaties with other countries so they didn’t attack each other because Henry, not being a conventional king, preferred peace than war.…

    • 1491 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Edward VI and Royal Authority
    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Edward VI and Royal Authority

    Secondly Edward outsourced some power to his nobles for them to protect and manage more volatile regions in England. Tis allowed the restoration of royal authority because it made sure that Edward had loyal nobles spread out across the country in strongholds, this would help stop rebellions and foreign armies invading. One example of this is when Edward gave his brother Richard duke of Gloseter the task of governing the north. The north at this time was a volatile region wit several disloyal lords to Edward as well as Scottish skirmishers crossing the borders into England.…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Henry VI and the Nobility
    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Henry VI and the Nobility

    then came Edward IV who was a strong king that sorted out the mess that Henry VI had left behind.…

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Trade Vs Manorialism
    • 2461 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Trade Vs Manorialism

    Each of the english monarchs had grown more and more power. William tightened the iron fist by creating feudalism 2.0, the domesday book, and built plenty of castles. Henry I followed suit, establishing the exchequer and creating traveling judges to try courts, then Henry II, started a 12 man jury and allowed nobles to buy their way out of becoming a knight. So when Henry II died and left his son, John, to the throne, it seemed natural that the king's power would continue to grow...well not exactly this time (sorry King John). Nobody really liked King John. He was always trying to increase taxes, including illegal church taxes and noble's taxes, and inevitably lost most of England's french land ( AU REVOIR JOHNNY). Usually, the…

    • 2461 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pope Gregory Win In Battles Over Power Essay
    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Pope Gregory Win In Battles Over Power Essay

    Sadly that is not is how feudal relationships work. After Henry’s removal he lost ALL power.…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    What Was Henry Viii's Rule
    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages

    What Was Henry Viii's Rule

    The successes of Henry VIII can be seen in his ability to keep and gain power and the force of his military efforts.To determine if Henry’s rule was a success, we must define what success means in the context of a ruler. This argument identifies the goals set forth by Henry, and his ability to achieve these goals. It’s also worthwhile to note the state and legacy that his rule left upon England. The reasons we can call Henry VIII’s reign a success will be laid out in his personal, political, religious and military accomplishments while on the throne. Henry’s reign can be defined by his ability to indulge in his desires. Whether that was to take and hold power, spend money on luxuries and war, or to consume more food in his later years. He had a number of personal desires beyond living a life of luxury, namely to have an male heir to the throne. Despite troubling history of marriage, he was successful in not only producing one heir, but three: Edward VI, Mary I, and Elizabeth I.Henry was successful in using fear to make those seeking to undermine think…

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    William The Conqueror Legacy
    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages

    William The Conqueror Legacy

    Amazingly, after becoming Duke of Normandy at very young age of eight, William grew to become know as William the Conqueror because of his learned ability to battle and take whatever he set his mind to. Being one of the most influential men in history, William left a legacy that would forever affect the English…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Injustice In The Declaration Of Independence
    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Injustice In The Declaration Of Independence

    Then, Oliver Cromwell became Lord Protector and ruled very poorly. After he died, his son ruled, and he did even worse than his father. He…

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Explain Why William Win The Battle Of Hastings
    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Explain Why William Win The Battle Of Hastings

    In contrast, William was very skilful during the time of the Battle of Hastings, William tricked Harold's army by getting his men to pretend to run away then Harold's army chased William's army, which meant that Harold's army ended up breaking the shield wall. William told his army to turn around and attack their enemies and that was how William had the luck and skill to win the battle and then the crown to become the King of…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More

Related Topics